Autoavaliação e avaliação pelos pares: uma análise de pesquisas internacionais recentes

Auteurs

  • Carla Barroso da Costa Université du Québec à Montréal. Canadá

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.7213/1981-416X.17.052.DS06

Résumé

Uma revisão de artigos publicados em dois periódicos internacionais – Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education e Active Learning in Higher Education – sobre autoavaliação e avaliação pelos pares, nos últimos sete anos (2010-2016), é o objetivo maior deste estudo. Uma análise detalhada dos artigos coloca em evidência diversos benefícios ligados a esses processos de regulação tão presentes no desenvolvimento de metodologias ativas de aprendizagem, como o melhor desempenho dos estudantes nas disciplinas e maior interação entre os membros do grupo. No entanto, limites são também identificados, como a necessidade de realizar retroações claras e pertinentes, assim como de associar os tópicos de estudo, para que esses processos de regulação façam sentido.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Références

ALLAL, L. Assessment and the regulation of learning. In: PETERSON, P.; BAKER, E.; MCGRAW, B. (Org.). International encyclopedia of education. Oxford: Elsevier, 2010. v. 3. p. 348-351.

______. Évaluation: un pont entre enseignement et apprentissage à l’université. In: ROMAINVILLE, M.; GOASOUÉ, R; VANTOUROUT, M. (Org.). Évaluation et enseignement supérieur. Bruxelles: De Boeck Supérieur, 2013. p. 21-40.

ASGHAR, A. Reciprocal peer coaching and its use as a formative assessment strategy for first-year students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 35, p. 403-417, 2010.

ASKEW, S.; LODGE, C. Gifts, ping-pong and loops – linking feedback and learning. In: ASKEW, S. (Org.). Feedback for learning. London: Routledge Falmer, 2000.

BIGGS, J. Student approaches to learning. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research, 1987.

BIGGS, J.; TANG, C. Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: SHRE; Open University Press, 2007.

BOUD, D.; FALCHIKOV, N. Quantitative studies of self‐assessment in higher education: a critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, v. 18, p. 529‐549, 1989.

______. Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 31, n. 4, p. 399-413, 2006.

BROWN, J. Feedback: the student perspective. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, v. 12, p. 33-51, 2007.

CARTNEY, P. Exploring the use of peer assessment as a vehicle for closing the gap between feedback given and feedback used. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 35, p. 551-564, 2010.

CÔTÉ, D. J. et al. L’approche d’apprentissage dans un curriculum médical préclinique basé sur l’apprentissage par problèmes. Recherche et Perspectives, v. 7, n. 4, p. 201-212, 2006.

CRISP, B. R. Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students’ subsequent submission of assessable work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 32, p. 571-581, 2007.

DREW, S. Student perceptions of what helps them learn and develop. Higher Education, v. 6, n. 3, p. 309-331, 2001.

DUARTE, A. M. Auto-regulação e abordagens à aprendizagem. In: SILVA, A. S.; DUARTE, A. M.; VEIGA-SIMÃO, M. (Org.). Aprendizagem auto-regulada – perspectivas psicológicas e educacionais. Porto: Porto, 2004. p. 39-54.

DURAND, M. J.; CHOUINARD, R. (Org.). L’évaluation des apprentissages: de la planification à la communication des résultats. Montréal: Marcel Didier, 2012.

FERNANDES, S.; FLORES, M. A.; LIMA, R. A aprendizagem baseada em projetos interdisciplinares: avaliação do impacto de uma experiência no ensino de engenharia. Avaliação, Campinas, v. 15, n. 3, p. 59-86, 2010.

GIBBS, G.; SIMPSON, C. Conditions under which assessment supports student learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, v. 1, p. 3-31, 2004.

GIBBS, J. C.; TAYLOR, J. D. Comparing student self-assessment to individualized instructor feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education, v. 17, n. 2, p. 111-123, 2016.

GIJBELS, D.; SEGERS, M.; STRUYF, E. Constructivist learning environments and the (im)possibility to change students’ perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning. Instructional Science, v. 36, p. 413-443, 2008.

GIPPS, C. Developments in educational assessment or what makes a good test? Assessment in Education, v. 1, p. 283-191, 1994.

GREZ, L.; VALCKE, M.; ROOZEN, I. How effective are self- and peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers’ assessments? Active Learning in Higher Education, v. 13, n. 2, p. 129-142, 2012.

HANDLEY, K.; WILLIAMS, L. From copying to learning: using exemplars to engage students with assessment criteria and feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 36, p. 95-108, 2011.

HATTIE, J.; TIMPERLEY, H. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, v. 77, p. 81-112, 2007.

HENDRY, G. D.; BROMBERGER, N.; ARMSTRONG, S. Constructive guidance and feedback for learning: the usefulness of exemplars, marking sheets and different types of feedback in a first year law subject. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 36, p. 1-11, 2011.

HODGSON, P.; CHAN, K.; LIU, J. Outcomes of synergetic peer assessment: first-year experience. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 39, n. 2, p. 168-178, 2014.

HUANG, S. C. Understanding learners’ self-assessment and self-feedback on their foreign language speaking performance. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 41, p. 803-820, 2016.

JAY, J.; OWEN, A. Providing opportunities for student self-assessment: the impact on the acquisition of psychomotor skills in occupational therapy students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 41, p. 1176-1192, 2016.

JONES, O.; GORRA, A. Assessment feedback only on demand: Supporting the few not supplying the many. Active Learning in Higher Education, v. 14, n. 2, p. 149-161, 2013.

KEMBER, D. et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of educational innovations: using the study process question. Studies in Educational Evaluation, v. 23, n. 2, p. 141-157, 1997.

LAVEAULT, D.; ALLAL, L. Implementing assessment for learning: theorical and practical issues. In: ______ (Org.). Assessment for learning: meeting the challenge of implementation. Londres: Springer, 2016.

LEDUC, D.; BLAIS, J. G.; RAÎCHE, G. Intégration des pratiques d’évaluation des apprentissages aux pratiques pédagogiques dans le domaine des arts au collégial. Revue des Sciences de l'Éducation, v. 38, n. 2, p. 373-396, 2012.

LIGHT, G.; COX, R. Learning and teaching in higher education: the reflective professional. London: Sage, 2001.

MCMAHON, T. Peer feedback in an undergraduate programme: using action research to overcome students’ reluctance to criticise. Educational Action Research, v. 18, p. 273-287, 2010.

MEYER, C. A. What’s the difference between authentic and performance assessment? Educational Leadership, v. 49, n. 8, p. 39-40, 1992.

MORRIS, C.; CHIKWA, G. Screencasts: how effective are they and how do students engage with them? Active Learning in Higher Education, v. 15, n. 1, p. 25-37, 2014.

MULDER, R. et al. How does student peer review influence perceptions, engagement and academic outcomes? A case study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 39, n. 6, p. 657-677, 2014.

NICOL, D. Learning is a two-way street. Times Higher Education, 24 abr. 2008. Disponível em: <https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/learning-is-a-two-way-street/401542.article>. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2017.

NICOL, D.; THOMSON, A.; BRESLIN, C. Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 39, p. 102-122, 2014.

ORGANIZAÇÃO PARA COOPERAÇÃO E DESENVOLVIMENTO ECONÔMICO (OCDE). Education indicators in focus. Paris, 2013. Disponível em: <https://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/EDIF%202013--N%C2%B014%20(eng)-Final.pdf>. Acesso em: 10 abr. 2017.

ORSMOND, P.; MERRY, S. The importance of self-assessment in students’ use of tutors’ feedback: a qualitative study of high and non-high achieving Biology undergraduates. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 38, p. 737-753, 2013.

PANADERO, E.; ALONSO-TAPIA, J. How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman’s cyclical model of self-regulated learning. Anales de Psicología, v. 30, n. 2, p. 450-462, 2014.

PEREIRA, D. R.; FLORES, M. A. Percepções dos estudantes universitários sobre a avaliação das aprendizagens: um estudo exploratório. Avaliação, Campinas, v. 17, n. 2, p. 529-556, 2012.

PRICE, M. et al. Feedback: all that effort but what is the effect? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 35, p. 277-289, 2010.

PRINCE, M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, v. 93, n. 3, p. 223-231, 2004.

ROMAINVILLE, M. Quand la coutume tient lieu de compétence: les pratiques d’évaluation des acquis à l’université. In: COLET, N. R.; ROMAINVILLE, M. (Org.). La pratique enseignante en mutation à l’université: perspectives en éducation et formation. Bruxelles: De Boeck et Larcier, 2006, p. 19-40.

ROMANO, G. Étudier… en surface ou en profondeur? Pédagogie Collégiale, v. 5, n. 2, p. 6-11, 1991.

SARRASIN, L. L’évaluation: au cœur de l’enseignement et de l’apprentissage. Vie Pédagogique, v. 141, p. 47-53, 2006.

SCALLON, G. L'évaluation des apprentissages dans une approche par compétences. Saint-Laurent (Montréal): Éditions du Renouveau Pédagogique, 2004.

SIMPSON, G.; CLIFTON, J. Assessing postgraduate student perceptions and measures of learning in a peer review feedback process. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 41, p. 501-514, 2016.

TARDIF, J. L’évaluation dans le paradigme constructiviste. In: HIVO, H. (Org.). L’évaluation des apprentissages: réflexions, nouvelles tendances et formation. Sherbrooke: Éditions du CRP, 1993. p. 27-56.

TOPPING, K. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, v. 68, n. 3, p. 249-276, 1998.

VILLAS BOAS, B. M. F. Avaliação no trabalho pedagógico universitário. In: CASTANHO, S.; CASTANHO, M. E. (Org.). O que há de novo na educação superior: do projeto pedagógico à prática transformadora. Campinas: Papirus, 2000.

WHITE, P. J. et al. Adopting an active learning approach to teaching in a research-intensive higher education context transformed staff teaching attitudes and behaviours. Higher Education Research and Development, v. 35, n. 3, p. 619-633, 2016.

WIGGINS, G. Assessing student performance: exploring the purpose and limits of testing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.

YUCEL, R. et al. The road to self-assessment: exemplar marking before peer review develops first-year students’ capacity to judge the quality of a scientific report. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 39, n. 8, p. 971-986, 2014.

ZIMMERMAN, B. Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In: BOEKAERTS, M.; PINTRICH, P.; ZEIDNER, M. (Org.). Handbook of self-regulation. New York: Academic Press, 2000. p. 13-39.

Téléchargements

Publiée

2017-06-26

Comment citer

Barroso da Costa, C. (2017). Autoavaliação e avaliação pelos pares: uma análise de pesquisas internacionais recentes. Revista Diálogo Educacional, 17(52), 431–453. https://doi.org/10.7213/1981-416X.17.052.DS06