Docencia para facilitar el aprendizaje activo y autorregulado

Auteurs

  • María Victoria Pérez Universidad de Concepción,
  • Alejandro Díaz-Mujica Universidad de Concepción
  • Julio Antonio González-Pienda Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo - España
  • José Carlos Núñez Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo - España

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.7213/rde.v10i30.2509

Résumé

Durante el desarrollo de las tareas propias del currículum, los profesores pueden ofrecer modelos a sus alumnos y discutir con ellos la aplicación de estrategias de autorregulación a situaciones cotidianas de aprendizaje. Este trabajo se centra en analizar las bases conceptuales de un programa basado en el enfoque procesual delaprendizaje autorregulado, para ser empleado en distintos contenidos y asignaturas de primer año de carreras universitarias. Se examina el concepto autorregulación del aprendizaje, la importancia del fomento de la autorregulación del aprendizaje efectuado por los docentes durante sus clases habituales, y el entrenamiento y desarrollo de competencias de autorregulación del aprendizaje. Seguidamente se describe un programa de docencia para facilitar el aprendizaje activoy autorregulado que se orienta (1) a la planificación del estudio y (2)a las estrategias cognitivas de aprendizaje, mediante la reflexión y experimentación efectuadas por el estudiante.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Références

ABLARD, K.; LIPSCHULTZ, R. Self-regulation in high-achieving students:

relations to advanced reasoning, achievement goals, and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 90, n. 1, p. 94-101, 1998.

ALLGOOD, W. P. et al. Handbook of college reading and study strategy

research. New Jersey: LEA, 2000.

BANDURA, A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. American Review of Psychology, v. 52, p. 1-26, 2001.

BARCA, A.; PERALBO, M.; BRENLLA, J. C. Atribuciones causales y enfoques de aprendizaje. La escala Siacepa. Psicothema, v. 16, n. 1, p. 94-103, 2004.

BIGGS, J. The reflective institution: assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning. Higher Education, v. 42, p. 221-237, 2001.

BOEKAERTS, M. Self-regulated learning: bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories. Educational Psychologist, v. 30, n. 4, p. 195-200, 1995.

______. Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition and motivation.

European Psychologist, v. 1, n. 2, p. 100-112, 1996.

BOEKAERTS, M.; NIEMVIRTA, M. Self-regulated learning: finding a balance between learning goals and ego-protective goals. In: BOEKAERTS, M.;PINTRICH, P.; ZEIDNER, M. (Comp.). Handbook of Self-regulation. New York: Academic Press, 2000. p. 417-450.

CANO, F. Consonance and dissonance in students’ learning experience. Learning and Instruction, v. 15, n. 3, p. 201-223, 2005.

ENTWISTLE, N. J.; TAIT, H. Promoting effective study skills. Effective learning and teaching in higher education. Sheffield: Universities’ and Colleges’ Staff Development Agency, 1992.

GARAVALIA, L. S.; GREDLER, M. E. Prior achievement aptitude and use of learning strategies as predictors of college student achievement. College Student Journal, v. 36, n. 4, p. 616-626, 2002.

GHATALA, E. S. et al. Improving children’s regulation of their reading Prep time. Contemporary Educational Psychology, v. 14, p. 49-66, 1989.

GONZÁLEZ, J.; WAGENAAR, R. Tuning educational structures in Europe.

Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto, 2003.

HADWIN, A. F.; WINNIE, P. H. Study strategies have meager support. A review with recommendations for implementation. Journal of Higher Education, v. 67, n. 6, p. 693-715, 1996.

HATTIE, J.; BIGGS, J.; PURDIE, N. Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: a meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research, v. 66, n. 2, p. 99-136, 1996.

MONEREO, C. Enseñanza estratégica: enseñar para la autonomía. In:

MONEREO, C. et al. Ser estratégico y autónomo aprendiendo. España:

GRAO, 2001. p. 11-40.

NOTA, L.; SORESI, S.; ZIMMERMAN, B. J. Self-regulation and academia and resilience: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Research,v. 41, n. 2, p. 198-251, 2005.

NÚÑEZ, J. et al. El aprendizaje autorregulado como medio y meta de la educación. Papeles del Psicólogo, v. 27, n. 3, p. 139-146, 2006a.

______. Evaluación de los procesos de autorregulación mediante autoinforme. Psicothema, v. 18, n. 3, p. 353-358, 2006b.

PAUNONEN, S. V.; ASHTON, M. C. Big five predictors of academic achievement. Journal of Research in Personality, v. 35, p. 78-90, 2001.

PÉREZ, M. V.; DÍAZ, A. Valoración de un programa de docencia para el

aprendizaje activo y autorregulado. Santiago, Chile: Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica, 2008. Disponível em: <http://ri.conicyt.

cl/575/article-30196.html>. Acceso em: 30 nov. 2008.

PÉREZ, M. V. et al. Estrategias cognitivas en asignaturas de ciencias exactas. Conferencia. In: SEMINARIO DE DOCENCIA. DIRECCIÓN DE

DOCENCIA, 2002, Concepción. Anais… Concepción: Universidad de

Concepción, 2002. p. 15-18.

PIKE, G. R.; KUH, G. A typology of student engagement for American colleges and universities. Research in Higher Education, v. 46, n. 2, p. 185-209, 2005.

PINTRICH, P. R. Continuities and discontinuities: future directions for research in Educational Psychology. Educational Psychologist, v. 29, n. 3, p. 137-148, 1994.

______. An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation

terminology, theory and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, v. 25, n. 1, p. 92-104, 2000.

______. A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning

in college students. Educational Psychology Review, v. 16, n. 4, p. 385-407, 2004.

PINTRICH, P. R.; DE GROOT, E. Motivational and self-regulated learning

components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational

Psychology, v. 82, n. 1, p. 33-40, 1990.

PINTRICH, P. R., SCHRAUBEN, B. Students’ motivational beliefs and their

cognitive engagement in classroom tasks. In: SCHUNK, D.; MEECE, J. L. (Ed.). Student perceptions in the classroom: Causes and consequences. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1992. p. 149-183.

PLANT, E. A. et al. Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, v. 30, n. 1, p. 96-116, 2005.

RINAUDO, M. C.; CHIECHER, A.; DONOLO, D. Motivación y uso de estrategias en estudiantes universitarios. Su evaluación a partir del Motivated Strategies Learning Questionnaire. Anales de Psicología, v. 19, n. 1, p. 107-119, 2003.

RODRÍGUEZ, S. et al. Diferencias en el uso del self-handicapping y pesimismo defensivo y sus relaciones con las metas de logro, la autoestima y las estrategias de autorregulación. Psicothema, v. 16, n. 4, p. 625-631, 2004.

ROSÀRIO, P. Estudar o estudar: as (des)venturas do testas. Porto: Porto, 2004a.

ROSÁRIO, P. et al. Processos de auto-regulação da aprendizagem e realização escolar no ensino básico. Psicologia, Educação e Cultura, v. 8, n. 1, p. 141-157, 2004b.

______. Enhancing narratives: testas´ (Mis)adventures. Academic Exchange Quarterly, v. 9, n. 4, p. 73-77, 2005a.

______. Trabalho de casa, tarefas escolares, auto-regulaçao e envolvimento parental. Psicología em Estudo, v. 10, n. 3, p. 343-351, 2005b.

______. El aprendizaje escolar examinado desde la perspectiva del «Modelo 3P» de J. Biggs. Psicothema, v. 17, n. 1, p. 20-30, 2005c.

______. Eficacia de un programa instruccional para la mejora de procesos y estrategias de aprendizaje en la enseñanza superior. Psicothema, v. 19, n. 3, p. 422-427, 2007.

ROSÀRIO, P.; NÚNEZ, J.; GONZÁLEZ-PIENDA, J. Stories that show how to study and how to learn: an experience in Portuguese school system. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, v. 1, p. 131-144, 2004.

______. Comprometer-se com o estudar na universidade: cartas do Gervasio au seu imbigo. Coimbra: Almedina, 2006.

SALOMON, G.; PERKINS, D.; ROCKY. Roads to transfer: rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, v. 24, n. 2, p. 113-142, 1989.

SIMPSON, M. et al. College academic assistance programs and pratices.

Educational Psychology Review, v. 9, n. 1, p. 39-87, 1997.

SUÁREZ, J. M.; FERNÁNDEZ, A. P.; ANAYA, D. Un modelo sobre la

determinación motivacional del aprendizaje autorregulado. Revista de Educación, n. 338, p. 295-306, 2005.

TUCKMAN, B.W. The effect of learning and motivation strategies training on college students’ achievement. Journal of College Student Development, v. 44, n. 3, p. 430-437, 2003.

VALLE, A. et al. Multiple goals, motivation, and academic learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 73, p. 71-87, 2003a.

______. Cognitive, motivational, and volitional dimensions of learning: An empirical test of a hypothetical model. Research in Higher Education, v. 44, n. 5, p. 557-580, 2003b.

VALLE, A. et al. Metas académicas, estrategias cognitivas y estrategias de autorregulación del estudio. Psicothema, v. 18, n. 2, p. 165-170, 2006.

WILLIAMS, P. E.; HELLMAN, C. Investigating self-regulated learning among first-generation community college students. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, v. 5, p. 83-87, 1998.

______. Differences in self-regulation for online learning between first-and secondgeneration college students. Research in Higher Education, v. 45, n. 1, p. 71-82, 2004.

WINNE, P. H.; JAMIESON–NOEL, D. Exploring students’ calibration of

self reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, v. 27, p. 551-572, 2002.

______. Self–regulating studying by objectives for learning: students’ reports compared to a model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, v. 28, n. 3, p. 259-276, 2003.

WOLTERS, C. A. Regulation of motivation: evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, v. 38, n. 4, p. 189-205, 2003.

ZIMMERMAN, B. J. Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In: SCHUNK, D. H.; ZIMMERMAN, B. J. (Ed.). Self-Regulated learning. From teaching to self-reflective practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998. p. 1-19.

______. Self-efficacy: an essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, v. 25, p. 82-91, 2000a.

______. Attaining self-regulation. A social cognitive perspective. In: BOEKAERTS, M.; PINTRICH, P.; ZEIDNER M. (Ed.). Handbook of self-regulation. New York: Academic press, 2000b. p. 13-39.

______. Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory into Practice, v. 41, n. 2, p. 64-70, 2002.

ZIMMERMAN, B. J.; BANDURA, A. Impact of self-regulatory influences on

writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, v. 31, n. 4, p. 845-862, 1994.

ZIMMERMAN, B. J.; BONNER, S.; KOVACH, R. Developing self-regulated

learners: beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1996.

ZIMMERMAN, B. J.; GREENBERG, D.; WEINSTEIN, C. E. Self-regulation

academic study time: a strategy approach. In: SCHUNK, D. H.; ZIMMERMAN, B. J. (Ed.). Self-regulation of learning and performance: issues and educational applications, Hillsdale. New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1994. p. 181-199.

ZIMMERMAN, B. J.; MARTINEZ-PONS, M. Development of a structured

interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, v. 23, n. 4, p. 614-628, 1986.

______. Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 80, n. 3, p. 284-290, 1988.

______. Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, andgiftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 82, n. 1, p. 51-59, 1990.

Téléchargements

Publiée

2010-07-07

Comment citer

Pérez, M. V., Díaz-Mujica, A., González-Pienda, J. A., & Núñez, J. C. (2010). Docencia para facilitar el aprendizaje activo y autorregulado. Revista Diálogo Educacional, 10(30), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.7213/rde.v10i30.2509