O conceito de função na ecologia contemporânea
Resumo
Texto completo:
PDFReferências
ACOT, P. Histoire de l’ecologie (Que sais-je?). Paris: pressesuniversitairesde France, 1994;
AYALA, F. InWilliamPaley shadow: Darwinexplanationof design. Ludus Vitalis, v. 12, p. 53-66, 2004;
ALMEIDA, A. M. O papel funcional da biodiversidade: uma análise epistemológica do Programa de Pesquisa Biodiversidade -Funcionamento Ecossistêmico. 2004. 156 f. Dissertação (Mestrado emEnsino, Filosofia e História dasCiências) – Universidade Federal da Bahia e Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Salvador, 2004;
ALMEIDA, A. M.; EL-HANI, C. N. A atribuição de função à biodiversidade se¬gundo a visão do ‘papel causal’: uma análise epistemológica do discurso ecológico dasúltimasduasdécadas. Filosofia e História da Biologia, v. 1, p. 21-39, 2006;
ALTIERI, M. A. The ecological role of biodiversity inagroecosystems. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, v. 74, p. 19-31, 1999. doi:10.1016/ S0167-8809(99)00028-6;
BEGON, M.; TOWNSEND, C.; HARPER, J. Ecologia: de indivíduosa ecos-sistemas. 4. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2007;
CAPONI, G. La ciencia de lo sustentable: razónde serdel discurso funcional enecología. Principia, v. 14, p. 349-373, 2010;
COLLIER, J. Autonomy andprocessclosure asthe basisforfunctional¬ity. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, v. 901, p. 280-291, 2000. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06287.x;
COLYVAN, M. etal. Philosophical issuesinecology: recenttrendsandfuture directions. Ecology and Society, v. 14, p. 22, 2009;
CUMMINS, R. Functional analysis. The Journal of Philosophy, v. 72, p. 741-765, 1975. doi:10.2307/2024640;
CUMMINS, R.; ROTH, M. Traitshave notevolvedto functionthe way they do because of a pastadvantage. In: AYALA, M. F. J.; ARP, R. (Ed.). Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. p. 72-85;
CLEMENTS, F. E. Nature andstructure of the climax. Journal of Ecology, v. 24, p. 252-284, 1936. doi:10.2307/2256278;
CLEMENTS, F. E. Plant succession: ananalysisof the developmentof vegeta¬tion. Publicationn. 242.Washington: Carnegie Institutionof Washington, 1916;
CRAVER, C. F. Role functions, mechanisms, andhierarchy. Philosophy of Science, v. 68, p. 53-74. 2001. doi:10.1086/392866;
CRUZ, L. C.; ROCHA, P. L. B.; EL-HANI, C. N. A prática científica na ecolo¬gia de comunidades: diálogosentre empirismo e teoria na literatura científica. Filosofia e História da Biologia, v. 2, p. 257-278, 2007;
DAGG, J. Ecosystemorganizationasside-effectsof replicatorandin¬teractoractivities. Biology and Philosophy, v. 18, p. 491-492, 2003. doi:10.1023/A:1024128115666;
DEWEY, J. Logic: the theory of inquiry. New York: Henry HoltandCo., 1938;
DÍAZ, S.; CABIDO, M. Vive la différence: plantfunctional diversity mattersto ecosystemprocesses. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, v. 16, p. 646-655, 2001. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02283-2;
ELTON, C. Animal ecology. New York: Macmillan, 1927;
ELTON, C. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. London: Methuen, 1958;
FISHER, B.; TURNER, R. K.; MORLING, P. Defining andclassifying ecosystemservicesfordecisionmaking. Ecological Economics, v. 68, p. 643-653, 2009. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014;
FROMM, O. Ecological structure andfunctionsof biodiversity aselementsof itstotal economic value. Environmental and Resource Economics, v. 16, p. 303-328, 2000. doi:10.1023/A:1008359022814;
GODFREY-SMITH, P. Functions: consensuswithoutunity. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, v. 74, p. 196-208, 1993;
GLEASON, H. A. The individualistic conceptof the plantassociation. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, v. 53, p. 7-26, 1926. doi:10.2307/2479933;
GLEICK, J. The information: a history, a theory, a flood. New York: Pantheon, 2011;
HÄTTENSCHWILLER, S.; FROMIN, N.; BARANTAL, S. Functional diver¬sity of terrestrial microbial decomposersandtheirsubstrates. Comptes Rendus Biologies, v. 334, p. 392-402, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2011.03.001;
HUBBELL, S. P. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeogra¬phy. Princeton: PrincetonUniversity Press, 2001;
HUNEMAN, P. Aboutthe conceptual foundationsof ecological engineering: stability, individuality andvalues. Procedia Environmental Sciences v. 9, p. 72-82, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2011.11.013;
JAX, K. Functionand“functioning” inecology: whatdoesitmean? Oikos, v. 111, p. 641-648, 2005. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2005.13851.x;
JAX, K. Canwe define ecosystems? onthe confusionbetweendefinitionanddescriptionof ecological concepts. Acta Biotheoretica, v. 55, p. 341-355, 2007. doi:10.1007/s10441-007-9024-7;
JOST, L. Entropy anddiversity. Oikos, v. 113, p. 363-375, 2006. doi:10.1111/ j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x;
LANARI, M. O.; COUTINHO, R. Biodiversidade e Funcionamento de Ecossistemas: síntese de umparadigma e sua expansão emambientesmarinhos. Oecologia Australis, v. 14, p. 959-988, 2010. doi:10.4257/oeco.2010.1404.09;
LOVELOCK, J. E. Handsupforthe Gaia hypothesis. Nature, v. 344, p.100-102, 1990. doi:10.1038/344100a0 ;
LOVELOCK, J. E. Gaia umModelo para a Dinâmica Planetária e Celular. In: THOMPSON, W. I. (Org.). Gaia uma Teoria do Conhecimento. São Paulo: Editora Gaia, 2000. p. 77-90;
MAY, R. M. Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton: PrincetonUniversity Press, 1973;
McLAURIN, J.; STERELNY, K. What is Biodiversity? Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2008. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226500829.001.0001;
MAGURRAN, A. Measuring biological diversity. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2004;
MOSSIO, M., SABORIDO, C.; MORENO, A. Anorganizational accountforbiological functions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, v. 60, p. 813-841, 2009. doi:10.1093/bjps/axp036;
McARTHUR, R.; WILSON, E. O. Anequilibriumtheory of insularzoogeo¬graphy. Evolution, v. 17, p. 373-387, 1963. doi:10.2307/2407089;
McINTOSH, R. P. The background of ecology: conceptandtheory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511608537;
MILCU, A. etal. Biotic carbonfeedbacksina materially closedsoil-vegetation¬-atmosphere system. Nature Climate Change, v. 2, p. 281-284, 2012. doi:10.1038/ nclimate1448;
MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT. Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. Washington: WorldResourcesInstitute, 2005;
NADROWSKI, K.; WIRTH, C.; SCHERER-LORENZEN, M. Isforestdiversi¬ty driving ecosystemfunctionandservice? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, v. 2, p. 75-79, 2010. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.003;
NAEEM, S. Speciesredundancy andecosystemreliability. Conservation Biology, v. 12, p. 39-45, 1998. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.96379.x;
NAEEM, S. Ecosystemconsequencesof biodiversity loss: the evolutionof a par¬adigm. Ecology, v. 83, p. 1537-1522, 2002. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1537: ECOBLT]2.0.CO;2;
NUNES-NETO, N. F.; EL-HANI, C. N. Gaia, teleologia e função. Episteme, v. 11, p. 15-48, 2006;
NUNES-NETO, N. F.; EL-HANI, C. N. Functional explanations in biol¬ogy, ecology, andearthsystemscience: contributionsfromphilosophy of biol¬ogy. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, v. 290, p. 185-200, 2011. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9422-3_13;
NORTON, B. Environmental ethicsandweak anthropocentrism. In: LIGHT, A.; ROLSTON III, H. (Ed.). Environmental ethics: ananthology. Malden: Blackwell, 2003. p. 163-174;
ODLING-SMEE, F. J.; LALAND, K. N.; FELDMAN, M. W. niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. New Jersey: PrincetonUniversity Press, 2003;
ODUM, E. Ecologia. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara, 1988;
OKSANEN, M.; PIETARINEN, J. (Org.). Philosophy and biodiversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511498527;
PETERS, R. H. A critique for ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991;
PFISTERER, A. B. etal. Rapiddecay of diversity–productivity relationshipsafterinvasioninexperimental plantcommunities. Basic and Applied Ecology, v. 5, p. 5-14, 2004. doi:10.1078/1439-1791-00215;
PICKETT, S.; KOLASA, J.; JONES, C. Ecological understanding: the na¬ture of theory andthe theory of nature. London: Elsevier, 2007;
PETCHEY, O.; GASTON, K. Functional diversity, speciesrichnessandcommunity composition. Ecology letters, v. 5, p. 402-411, 2002. doi:10.1046/ j.1461-0248.2002.00339.x;
PETCHEY, O.; GASTON, K. Functional diversity: back to ba¬sicsandlooking forward. Ecology Letters, v. 9, p. 741-758, 2006. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00924.x;
RICOTTA, C. Throughthe jungle of biological diversity. Acta Biotheoretica, v. 53, p. 29-38, 2005. doi:10.1007/s10441-005-7001-6;
SABORIDO, C.; MOSSIO, M.; MORENO, A. Biological organizationandcross-generationfunctions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, v. 62, p. 583-606, 2011. doi:10.1093/bjps/axq034;
SARKAR, S. Ecology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2005. Available at: . Accesson: 27 jun. 2012;
SARKAR, S. Fromecological diversity to biodiversity. In: HULL, D.; RUSE, M. (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. p. 388-409. doi:10.1017/ CCOL9780521851282.021;
SCHEINER, S. M.; WILLIG, M. R. A general theory of ecology. Theoretical Ecology, v. 1, p. 21-28, 2008. doi:10.1007/s12080-007-0002-0;
SCHEINER, S.; WILLIG, M. The theory of ecology. London: University of Chicago Press, 2011. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226736877.001.0001;
SHANNON, C. E.; WEAVER, W. The mathematical theory of communica¬tion. Urbana: University of IllinoisPress, 1949;
SOBER, E.; WILSON, D. S. Unto others: the evolutionandpsychology of unselfishbehavior. Cambridge: HarvardUniversity Press, 1998;
SWENSON, W.; ARENDT, J.; WILSON, D. S. Artificial selectionof mi¬crobial ecosystemsfor3-chloroaniline biodegradation. Environmental Microbiology, v. 2, p. 564-571, 2000. doi:10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00140.x;
SWENSON, W.; WILSON, D. S.; ELIAS, R. Artificial ecosystemselection. PNAS, v. 97, p. 9110-9114, 2000. doi:10.1073/pnas.150237597;
TILMAN, D. Causes, consequencesandethicsof biodiversity. Nature, v. 405, p. 208-211, 2000. doi:10.1038/35012217;
TILMAN, D. Effectsof diversity andcompositionongrasslandstability andproductivity. In: PRESS, M. C.; HUNTLY, N. J.; LEVIN, S. (Ed.). Ecology: achievementandchallenge. Blackwell Science: Oxford, 2001. p. 183-207;
TILMAN, D. etal. Forecasting agriculturally drivenglobal environmental change. Science, v. 292, p. 281-284, 2001. doi:10.1126/science.1057544;
WRIGHT, L. Functions. The Philosophical Review, v. 82, n. 2, p. 139-168, 1973. doi:10.2307/2183766.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7213/revistadefilosofiaaurora.7765
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Direitos autorais 2017 Editora Universitária Champagnat

Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.