Public utilities services in Brazil: a paradox between two models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7213/revdireconsoc.v14i3.29570Keywords:
public utilities services; regulation; railways; energy; economic thought.Abstract
This article analyzes the relationship between the economy and the law in the construction of regulatory models of public services in Brazil, also using the study of two national experiences: the rail sector and the electricity sector. It is not exactly a history of the regulation of public services, but a historical and economic analysis of the problem of the construction of models of provision that would fit each stage of the construction of the Brazilian State. There is a kind of paradox of a State that opts for a given model of provision while the legislation in force moves in the opposite direction. Open options, disputes, silenced voices, specific circumstances are elements that a long-term analysis tends not to address. However, the proposal presented here for the periodization of the models of provision of public services in Brazil is useful as it allows to observe the paradox, that is the object of this article.
Downloads
References
BANDEIRA DE MELLO, Celso A. Curso de Direito Administrativo. 31. ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2014.
BAUMOL, William; PANZAR, John C.; WILLIG, Robert D. Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. 1.ed. San Diego: Harcourt College Publishers, 1988.
BÉRTOLA, Luis; OCAMPO, José Antônio. Desenvolvimento, vicissitudes e desigualdade – uma história econômica da América Latina desde a independência. Mar del Plata: Secretaria General Iberoamericana, 2010.
BOYD, William. Just Price, Public Utility, and the Long History of Economic Regulation in America. Yale Journal on Regulation, Yale, vol. 35, p. 721-777, 2018.
BRAGA, Odilon. Serviços públicos concedidos. Revista de Direito Administrativo, [S. l.], v. 7, p. 33–51, 1947.
BRAUDEL, Fernand. A dinâmica do capitalismo. Rio de Janeiro: Rocco, 1987.
CLARK, John M. The Social Control of Business. 2. ed. Nova Iorque: Augustus M. Kelley, 1928.
DEMSETZ, Harold. Why Regulate Utilities? Journal of Law and Economics, Chicago, vol 11, nº 1, p. 55-65, 1968.
EMMONS, William M. Franklin D. Roosevelt, Electric Utilities, and the Power of Competition. The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge, vol. 53, p. 880-907, 1993.
FURTADO, Celso A economia latino-americana. 4. ed. São Paulo: Cia das Letras, 2007.
HOBSBAWN, Eric. A Era das Revoluções. 16. ed. São Paulo: Cia. das Letras, 2002.
JOHNSON, B. B.; SAES, F.A.M.; TEIXEIRA, H.; WRIGHT, J. T. C. Serviços Públicos no Brasil: mudanças e perspectivas. São Paulo: Editora Edgar Blucher, 1996.
LANNA, Ana Lúcia Duarte. Ferrovias no Brasil – 1870-1920. Revista História Econômica & História de Empresas, VIII.1, p. 7-40, 2005.
LIMA, José Luiz. Estado e energia no Brasil. São Paulo: IPE USP, 1984.
LOUREIRO, Gustavo Kaercher. As origens e os compromissos das figuras do equilíbrio econômico-financeiro na concessão de serviços públicos e da justa remuneração do capital empregado nas atividades de utilidade pública. Rio de janeiro: FGV/CERI, 2020.
MARICHAL, Carlos. Las finanzas y la construcción de las nuevas naciones latinoamericanas (1810-1880). In: VÁZQUEZ, Josefina Z (Org.). Historia General de America Latina, Vol. VI. Madrid: UNESCO, 2004, p. 399-420.
MEDAUAR, Odete. Direito Administrativo Moderno. 16. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2011.
NASH, L. R. The Economics of Public Utilities. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1925.
NOWOTNY, Kenneth. The Economics of Public Utility Regulation: An Overview. In: NOWOTNY, Kenneth; SMITH, David B.; TREBING, Harry M (Org.). Public Utility Regulation – the economic and social control of industry. Boston, Dordrecht, Londres: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989, p. 9-34.
NUNES, Ivanil. Estatização, desestatização e reestatização no setor ferroviário argentino e brasileiro. Revista Uruguaya de Historia Económica, vol. VI (9), p. 49-72, jun. 2016.
PALMER, R. R. The Age of the Democratic Revolution – a Political History of Europe and America, 1760-1800. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969.
POMERANZ, Kenneth. The Great Divergence: China, Europe and the Making of the Modern World Economy. 1. ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
SAES, Alexandre M.; SASSE, Carla Muller. A AMFORP e o setor elétrico brasileiro (1926-1964). Anuario CEEED, Buenos Aires, nº 4, Ano IV, p. 111-148, 2012.
SAES, Flávio A. Marques. As ferrovias de São Paulo (1870-1940). São Paulo: Hucitec, 1981.
SAES, Flávio A. Marques. A grande empresa de serviços públicos na economia cafeeira. São Paulo: Hucitec, 1986.
SCHUMPETER, Joseph A. History of Economic Analysis. Londres: Routledge, 1986.
STIGLER, Georg. The Theory of Economic Regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, vol. 2, n. 1, p. 3-21, 1971.
TONETO JÚNIOR, Rudinei. A situação atual do saneamento básico no Brasil: problemas e perspectivas. São Paulo, 2004, 325 f. Tese (Livre-Docência) – Economia, Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo.
TROESKEN, Werner. Regime Change and Corruption – A History of Public Utility Regulation. In: GLAESER, Edward L; GOLDIN, Claudia (Org.). Corruption and Reform: Lessons from America’s Economic History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.
VALLADÃO, Alfredo. Bases para o Código de Águas da República. Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Nacional, 1907.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Amaury Patrick Gremaud, Alexandre Ganan de Brites Figueiredo, Maria Paula Vieira Cicogna, Rudinei Toneto Júnior
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Economic and Socio-Environmental Law the right of first publication with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International which allows sharing the work with recognition of the authors and its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this Journal (eg.: publishing in institutional repository or as a book), with a recognition of its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (see the Effect of Open Access).
