O Sistema de Solução de Controvérsias da OMC e a alternativa da arbitragem interina do MPIA

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7213/revdireconsoc.v15i3.30099

Palavras-chave:

Organização Mundial do Comércio; sistema de solução de controvérsias; segurança nacional; mecanismo interino de apelação; arbitragem; jurisprudência.

Resumo

O Sistema de Solução de Controvérsias da OMC, criado em 1994, consiste em uma estrutura a garantir decisões baseadas em fundamentos jurídicos e dotada do consenso inverso a assegurar o cumprimento de suas disposições. Com o impasse criado pelos Estados Unidos a partir de 2015, pela discordância nas decisões do Órgão de Apelação, sendo efetivamente bloqueado em dezembro de 2019. Essa realidade gerou um conjunto de casos inoperantes, em que os membros da OMC passaram a “apelar ao vazio” e, assim, descumprir com as regras da OMC. Frente à situação de inoperância do sistema multilateral do comércio, um conjunto de membros da OMC aprovaram a criação de um mecanismo alternativo a proporcionar decisões de segunda instância, conhecido como o mecanismo interino de apelação (Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement - MPIA). Criado em 2020, encontra-se o caso DS591 entre a Colômbia e a União Europeia. O mecanismo alternativo do MPIA, apesar de recente, permite debater sobre a eventual fragmentação da jurisprudência da OMC, uma vez que somente 25 membros aderiram à iniciativa. Além disso, frente à reticente posição dos Estados Unidos em manter o bloqueio do Órgão de Apelação e assegurar seu protecionismo baseado na alegação de segurança nacional, o sistema de comércio multilateral tende a se fragmentar em um conjunto de regras plurilaterais e regionais, assemelhando-se ao sistema internacional de proteção do investimento, composto por regras bilaterais e regionais.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Thiago Ferreira Almeida, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

Pesquisador de Pós-Doutorado na Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Belo Horizonte-MG, Brasil) e convidado como pesquisador na Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa (Lisboa, Portugal). Doutor em Direito Internacional do Investimento pela UFMG. Professor no Centro de Excelência Jean Monnet UFMG. Advogado e Especialista em Políticas Públicas no Banco de Desenvolvimento de Minas Gerais (BDMG).

Referências

AARUP, Sarah A. ‘All talk and no walk’: America ain’t back at the WTO. Disponível em: <https://www.politico.eu/article/united-states-world-trade-organization-joe-biden/>. Acesso em: 21 set. 2022.

AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE AFRICAN CONTINENTAL FREE TRADE AREA - AfCFTA. Full text. Disponível em: <https://au.int/sites/default/files/treaties/36437-treaty-consolidated_text_on_cfta_-_en.pdf>. Acesso em: 21 fev. 2023.

ANDERSEN, Scott; FRIEDBACHER, Todd; LAU, Christian; LOCKHART, Nicolas; REMY, Jan Yves; SANDFORD, Iain. Using arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU to ensure the availability of appeals. CTEI Working Paper, 2017-17, Disponível em: <https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/295745?ln=en>. Acesso em: 21 fev. 2023.

BAHRI, Amrita. “Appellate Body Held Hostage”: Is Judicial Activism at Fair Trial? Institute of European Law. Working Papers n. 03/2019. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 2019. Disponível em: <http://epapers.bham.ac.uk/3220/1/IEL_Working_Paper_03-2019_Bahri.pdf>. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2023.

BARONCINI, Elisa. Preserving the Appellate Stage in the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism: the EU and the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement. IYIL, Vol. 29 (2019). Leiden: Koninkljke Brill, 2020. Disponível em: <https://brill.com/view/journals/iyio/29/1/article-p33_33.xml?language=en>. Acesos em: 19 fev. 2023.

BASCHUK, Bricy. US Snub of WTO Ruling Marks a ‘Step Back’ in Era of Free Trade. Bloomberg. December 12th, 2022. Disponível em: <https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2022-12-12/supply-chain-latest-us-snub-of-wto-called-a-step-back-for-trade>. Acesso em: 14 fev. 2023.

CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE. The Bush Doctrine. Front Page Magazine. October 7th, 2002. Disponível em: <https://carnegieendowment.org/2002/10/07/bush-doctrine-pub-1088>. Acesso em: 17 fev. 2023.

COMPREHENSIVE AND PROGRESSIVE AGREEMENT FOR TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP - CPTPP. Full text. Disponível em: < https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/trade/free-trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements-in-force/cptpp/comprehensive-and-progressive-agreement-for-trans-pacific-partnership-text-and-resources/#bookmark0>. Acesso em: 21 fev. 2023.

DAVEY, William J. WTO Dispute Settlement: Crown Jewel or Costume Jewelry? World Trade Review, v. 21, n. 3, Amy 2022. Disponível em: <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/world-trade-review/article/wto-dispute-settlement-crown-jewel-or-costume-jewelry/89815692055321EB8662DF7AA6625643>. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2023.

DEEPAK, Garima. WTO Dispute Settlement – The Road Ahead. n. 51 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol. 981(2019). Disponível em: <https://nyujilp.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/NYI308.pdf>. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2023.

DUNOFF, Jeffrey L.; POLLACK, Mark A. O Trilema Judicial. trad. Lucas Carlos Lima, Lucas Mendes Felippe. 1 ed. Belo Horizonte, São Pualo: D’Plácido, 2021, p. 117-119; LESTER, Simon. Ending the WTO Dispute Settlement Crisis: Where to from here? International Institute For Sustainable Development. March 2th, 2022. Disponível em: <https://www.iisd.org/articles/united-states-must-propose-solutions-end-wto-dispute-settlement-crisis>. Acesso em: 21 set. 2022.

ERIE, Matthew S. Legal Systems Inside Out: American Legal Exceptionalism and China's Dream of Legal Cosmopolitanism. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, Forthcoming, December 23, 2022.

EU-CANADA COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC AND TRADE AGREEMENT - CETA. Full Text. Disponível em: <https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/ceta-aecg/text-texte/toc-tdm.aspx?lang=eng>. Acesso em: 21 fev. 2023.

EU-MERCORSUR. Full text. Disponível em: <https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-trade-relationships-country-and-region/countries-and-regions/mercosur/eu-mercosur-agreement/text-agreement_en>. Acesso em: 21 fev. 2023.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Multilateral Investment Court project. Disponível em: <https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/enforcement-and-protection/multilateral-investment-court-project_en>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

GEOPOLITICS. What Just Happened at the WTO? Everything You Need to Know. A interview with Nicolas Lamp. December 26th, 2019. Disponível em: <https://www.brinknews.com/what-just-happened-at-the-wto-everything-you-need-to-know/>. Acesso em: 21 dez. 2022.

GERVAIS, Nicolas; OUELLET, André-Philippe. L’échapper belle : AMPA ou MPIA. Quatre lettres au secours du système de règlement des différends à l’OMC. Revue québécoise de droit international. 2019. Disponível em: <https://www.persee.fr/doc/rqdi_0828-9999_2019_num_32_2_2463>. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2023.

GILBERT, Guillaume. La justice internationale à aube du XXIe siècle. Conférence faite à l’Institut du droit de la paix et du développement le 3 novembre 2004. Perspectives internationales et européennes, 2005, Perspectives internationales et européennes, 1. Disponível em: <https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03277939/document>. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2023.

GRAMLICH, John. How Trump compares with other recent presidents in appointing federal judges. January 13th, 2021. Disponível em: <https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/01/13/how-trump-compares-with-other-recent-presidents-in-appointing-federal-judges/>. Acesso em: 23 dez. 2022.

HOPEWELL, Kristen. When the hegemon goes rogue: leadership amid the US assault on the liberal trading order. International Affairs, v. 97, n. 4, July 2021. Disponível em: <https://academic.oup.com/ia/article/97/4/1025/6296668>. Acesos em: 19 fev. 2023.

KISSINGER, Henry. Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994, p. 43-45.

HU, Jiaxiang; WANG, Dapo. To Be or Not to Be? The Implementation of the MPIA from the Perspective of the WTO Dispute Settlement. China & WTO Review. 2021L: 2. Disponível em: <http://dx.doi.org/10.14330/cwr.2021.7.2.01>. Acesos em: 19 fev. 2023.

LEHNE, Jens. Crisis at the WTO: Is the Blocking of Appointments to the WTO Appellate Body by the United States Legally Justified? Berlim: Carl Grossmann Publishers, 2019. Disponível em: <https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/24338/CG_978394115941.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y>. Acesso em 19 fev. 2023.

LESTER, Simon. Is the Doha Round Over? The WTO’s Negotiating Agenda for 2016 and Beyond. CATO Institute. February 11th, 2016. Disponível em: <https://www.cato.org/free-trade-bulletin/doha-round-over-wtos-negotiating-agenda-2016-beyond>. Acesso em: 21 set. 2022.

LESTER, Simon. Katherine Tai on WTO Dispute Settlement. International Economic Law and Policy Blog. October 14th, 2021. Disponível em: <https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2021/10/katherine-tai-on-wto-dispute-settlement.html>. Acesso em: 14 fev. 2023.

LESTER, Simon. Can Interim Appeal Arbitration Preserve the WTO Dispute System? Free Trade Bulletin, n. 77. CATO Institute. September 1st, 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.cato.org/free-trade-bulletin/can-interim-appeal-arbitration-preserve-wto-dispute-system>. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2023.

MANKIW, Gregory N. Principles of Economics, 9 ed. Boston: Engage, 2021.

O’CONNELL, Mary Ellen. American Exceptionalism and the International Law of Self- Defense. 31 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 43 (2002). January 2002. Disponível em: <https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1351&context=djilp>. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2023.

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE. Statement from USTR Spokesperson Adam Hodge. December 9th, 2022. Disponível em: <https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2022/december/statement-ustr-spokesperson-adam-hodge>. Acesso em 14 dez. 2022.

PAUWELYN, Joost. WTO Dispute Settlement Post 2019: What to Expect? What Choice to Make? July 7, 2019. Disponível em: <https://ssrn.com/abstract=3415964 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3415964>. Acesos em: 19 fev. 2023.

PELC, Krysztof J.; PAUWELYN, Joost. The WTO’s trade dispute appeal system could end on Dec. 10. Here’s what you need to know. The Washington Post. December 5th, 2019. Disponível em: <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/12/05/wtos-trade-dispute-appeal-system-could-end-dec-heres-what-you-need-know/>. Acesso em: 21 dez. 2022.

POGORETSKYY, Vitaly. Is the WTO losing its crown jewel to FTAs and why should this concern economically disadvantaged WTO members? Trade, Law and Development. v. XIV, n. 1, 2022.

REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT - RCEP. Full text. Disponível em: < https://rcepsec.org/legal-text/>. Acesso em: 21 fev. 2023.

SHAFFER, Gregory; ELSIG, Manfred; PUIG, Sergio. The Extensive (but Fragile) Authority of the WTO Appellate Body. Law and Contemporary Problems, v. 79, n. 1. The Variable Authority of International Courts, 2016. Disponível em: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/43920651>. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2023.

SCHOTT, Jeffrey J., JUNG, Euijin. The WTO’s Existential Crisis: How to Salvage Its Ability to Settle Trade Disputes. Policy Brief. Peterson Institute for International Economics. December 2019. Disponível em: <https://www.piie.com/sites/default/files/documents/pb19-19.pdf>. Acesso em: 14 fev. 2023.

UNGPHAKORN, Peter. Technical note: Appeals ‘into the void’ in WTO dispute settlement. Trade & Blog. February 13th, 2021. Disponível em: <https://tradebetablog.wordpress.com/technical-note-appeals-into-the-void-in-wto-dispute-settlement/>. Acesso em: 21 dez. 2022.

UNITED STATES. Ambassador Katherine Tai's Remarks As Prepared for Delivery on the World Trade Organization. Office of the United States Trade Representative. October, 2021. Disponível em: <https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/speeches-and-remarks/2021/october/ambassador-katherine-tais-remarks-prepared-delivery-world-trade-organization>. Acesso em: 14 fev. 2023.

UNITED STATES. Statement by Ambassador Maria Pagán. U.S. Statements at the January 27th, 2023, DSB Meeting. Disponível em: <https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2023/january/statements-united-states-meeting-wto-dispute-settlement-body>. Acesso em: 17 fev. 2023.

UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW. Report of Working Group III (Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform) on the work of its forty-second session. New York, 14-18 February 2022. A/CN.9/1092. Disponível em: <https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/final_report_acn.9.1092_with_annex_45.pdf>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

UNITED STATES-MEXICO-CANADA AGREEMENT. Full text. Disponível em: <https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/united-states-mexico-canada-agreement/agreement-between>. Acesso em: 21 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. Understanding on rules and procedures governing the settlement of disputes. 2022a. Annex 2 of the WTO Agreement. Disponível em: <https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dsu_e.htm>. Acesso em: 7 dez. 2022.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994. Annex 1A of the WTO Agreement. 2022b. Disponível em: <https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/ai17_e/gatt1994_e.htm>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. Working Procedures for Appellate Review. WT/AB/WP/6. September 15th, 2020g. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=Q:/WT/AB/WP6.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 21 dez. 2022.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS371. Thailand — Customs and Fiscal Measures on Cigarettes from the Philippines. Report of the facilitator pursuant to paragraph 5 of the "Understanding between the Philippines and Thailand to pursue facilitator-assisted discussions aimed at progressing and resolving outstanding issues in regard to DS371. July 5th, 2022c. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/371-46.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS567. Saudi Arabia — Measures concerning the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights. Communication from Qatar. April 25th, 2022d. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/567-11.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023. Ressalta-se que o relatório do painel confirmou a existência de emergência em relações internacionais, cujo item será fundamental nos casos envolvendo os Estados Unidos julgados em dezembro de 2022.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS476. European Union and its Member States — Certain Measures Relating to the Energy Sector. Communication from the Appellate Body. November 21st, 2018. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/476-8.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS461. Colombia — Measures Relating to the Importation of Textiles, Apparel and Footwear. Communication from the Appellate Body. February 20th, 2019a. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/461-29.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS518. India — Certain Measures on Imports of Iron and Steel Products. Communication from the Appellate Body. February 22nd, 2019b. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/518-10.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS534. United States — Anti-Dumping Measures Applying Differential Pricing Methodology to Softwood Lumber from Canada. Communication from the Appellate Body. August 6th, 2019c. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/534-6.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS523. United States — Countervailing Measures on Certain Pipe and Tube Products (Turkey). Communication from the Appellate Body. August 6th, 2019d. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/523-7.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS510. United States — Certain Measures Relating to the Renewable Energy Sector. Communication from the Appellate Body. October14th, 2019e. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/510-7.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS541. India — Export Related Measures. Notification of an appeal by India under article 16.4 and article 17 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU), and under rule 20(1) of the Working Procedures for Appellate Review. November 22nd, 2019f. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/541-7.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS316. European Communities and Certain member States — Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft. Recourse to article 21.5 of the DSU by the European Union. December 11st, 2019g. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/316-43.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS436. United States — Countervailing Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India. Joint communication from India and the United States. January 16th, 2020a. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/436-22.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS494. European Union — Cost Adjustment Methodologies and Certain Anti-Dumping Measures on Imports from Russia — (Second complaint). Notification of an appeal by the European Union. September 1st, 2020b. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/494-7.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS533. United States — Countervailing Measures on Softwood Lumber from Canada. Notification of an appeal by the United States. September 29th, 2020c. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/533-5.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS543. United States — Tariff Measures on Certain Goods from China. Notification of an appeal by the United States. October 27th, 2020d. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/543-10.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS484. Indonesia — Measures Concerning the Importation of Chicken Meat and Chicken Products. Notification of an appeal by Indonesia. December 18th, 2020e. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/484-25.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS553. Korea — Sunset Review of Anti-Dumping Duties on Stainless Steel Bars. Notification of an appeal by the Republic of Korea. February 1st, 2021a. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/553-6.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS538. Pakistan — Anti-Dumping Measures on Biaxially Oriented Polypropylene Film from the United Arab Emirates. Notification of an appeal by Pakistan. February 25th, 2021b. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/538-5.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS539. United States — Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products and the Use of Facts Available. Notification of an appeal by the United States. March 22nd, 2021c. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/539-9.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS578. Morocco — Definitive Anti-Dumping Measures on School Exercise Books from Tunisia. Communication from Tunisia. August 18th, 2021d. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/578-6.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS562. United States — Safeguard Measure on Imports of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products. Notification of an appeal by China. September 20th, 2021e. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/562-12.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS579. India — Measures Concerning Sugar and Sugarcane. Notification of an appeal by India. January 11th, 2022e. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/579-10.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS544: United States - Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminium Products. WT/DS544/R. Report of Painel, December 9th, 2022f. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/544R.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 17 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS597: United States - Originin Marketing Requirement. WT/DS597/R. Report of Painel, December 21st, 2022g. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/597R.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 17 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS512: Russia - Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit. WT/DS512/R. Report of Painel, April 5th, 2019h. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/512R.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 18 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS567: Saudi Arabia - Measures Concerning the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights. WT/DS567/R. Report of Painel, June 16th, 2020f. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/567R.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 18 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS552: United States - Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminium Products. WT/DS552/R. Report of Painel, December 9th, 2022h. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/552R.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS556: United States - Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminium Products. WT/DS556/R. Report of Painel, December 9th, 2022i. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/556R.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS564: United States - Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminium Products. WT/DS564/R. Report of Painel, December 9th, 2022j. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/564R.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS583. Turkey - Certain Measures concerning the Production, Importation and Marketing of Pharmaceutical Products. WT/DS583/ARB25. July 25th, 2022l. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/583ARB25.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. DS591. Colombia — Anti-Dumping Duties on Frozen Fries from Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. WT/DS591/ARB25. December 21st, 2022m. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/591ARB25.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. Statement by China regarding the panel report in the dispute DS544, United States — Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminium Products. Panels established to review EU complaints regarding Chinese trade measures. January 23rd, 2023a. Disponível em: <https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news23_e/dsb_27jan23_e.htm>. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2023.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. Members welcome MC12 commitment to address dispute settlement. June 30th, 2022k. Disponível em: <https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news22_e/dsb_30jun22_e.htm>. Acesso em: 2 fev. 2022.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. Statement on a mechanism for developing, documenting, and sharing practices and procedures in the conduct of WTO disputes. JOB/DSB/1/Add.12. April 30th, 2020c. Disponível em: <https://www.worldtradelaw.net/document.php?id=misc/DSB1A12.pdf&mode=download#page=4>. Acesso em 11 nov. 2022.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. Statement on a mechanism for developing, documenting, and sharing practices and procedures in the conduct of WTO disputes. JOB/DSB/1/Add.12/Suppl.5. August 3rd, 2020d. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/Jobs/DSB/1A12S5.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em 11 nov. 2022.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. Communication from Colombia. DS591. January 23rd, 2023b. Disponível em: <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/591-9.pdf&Open=True>. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2023.

ZARRA, Giovanni. The Issue of Incoherence in Investment Arbitration: Is There Need for a Systemic Reform? Chinese Journal of International Law, v. 17, Issue 1, March 2018. Disponível em: <https://academic.oup.com/chinesejil/article/17/1/137/4964724>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023.

ZHOU, Weihuan; GAO, Henry S. ‘Overreaching’ or ‘Overreacting’? Reflections on the Judicial Function and Approaches of WTO Appellate Body. July 7, 2019, 53(6), Journal of World Trade 951-978, UNSW Law Research Paper n. 19-49, Singapore Management University School of Law Research Paper n. 30/2019. Disponível em: <https://ssrn.com/abstract=3418737 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3418737>. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2023.

Downloads

Publicado

2024-09-30

Como Citar

FERREIRA ALMEIDA, Thiago. O Sistema de Solução de Controvérsias da OMC e a alternativa da arbitragem interina do MPIA. Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental, Curitiba, v. 15, n. 3, p. e275, 2024. DOI: 10.7213/revdireconsoc.v15i3.30099. Disponível em: https://periodicos.pucpr.br/direitoeconomico/article/view/30099. Acesso em: 21 dez. 2024.

Artigos Semelhantes

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.