Algumas considerações sobre o Philosophiae Doctor e o plágio acadêmico

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7213/1981-416X.24.080.AO05

Resumo

A integridade, boas práticas e condutas na pesquisa se constituem, hodiernamente, cada vez mais arraigadas e integrantes de uma atitude acadêmica responsável. No lócus acadêmico uma pesquisa de doutorado, por exemplo, não pode prescindir de fatores de ordem do ineditismo e que asseveram uma pesquisa original. Nesses termos, o presente trabalho discute a noção de plágio, sem negligenciar elementos de gênese e evolução ao decurso dos últimos séculos e novas políticas de prevenção científica. Ademais, atendo-se ao exame do papel do Philosophiae Doctor (PhD), discute também novas modalidades emergentes de pesquisa, como, por exemplo, o caso do (PhDP) por publicação. Finalmente, o trabalho ampara uma compreensão não trivial entre categorias emergentes de manifestação do plagio, diante de relações acadêmicas não estáticas e características de uma pesquisa de doutorado.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Francisco Regis Vieira Alves, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado do Ceará (IFCE)

Doutor em Educação com ênfase no ensino de Matemática

Referências

AIRES, J. P. Análise de plágio em teses e dissertações dos programas de pós-graduação na área de ensino no período de 2010 a 2012. (tese de doutorado), Ponta Grossa: UFTPR, 2017.

AIRES, J. P. O plágio e a integridade em pesquisa: uma revisão sistemática no Brasil. Revista Ensino & Pesquisa, v. 17, nº 2, 125 – 145, 2019.

ANGELIL-CARTER, S. Stolen Language? Plagiarism in Writing. Essex: Pearson Education Limited, 2000.

BADLEY, G. Publish and be doctor-rated: the PhD by published work, Quality assurance in Education, v. 17, nº 4, 331- 342, 2009.

BARNHART, R. K. (Ed.) Chambers Dictionary of Etymology (Edinburgh, Chambers), 1988.

BAYARD, P. Publish and be doctor-rated: the PhD by published work. Quality Assurance in Education, v. 17, nº 4, 331 – 342, 2015.

BERLINCK, R. G. S. The academic plagiarism and its punishments - a review. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, v. 21, n. 3, 2011.

BETANCOURT. N.; JOCHEM; T; OTNER. S. M. G. Standing on the shoulders of giants: How star scientists influence their coauthors. Research Policy, v.25, nº 1, 1 – 1, 2023.

BRETAG, T. Defining Academic Integrity: International Perspectives – Introduction. In: BRETAG, T. (Eds). Handbook of Academic Integrity (pp. 3 – 7), Singapore: Springer, 2016.

BRETAG, T., & MAHMUD, S. A model for determining student plagiarism: Electronic detection and academic judgement. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 6, 49–60, 2009.

BRIEN, D Publish or perish? Investigating the doctorate by publication in writing. Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the Australian Association of Writing Programs, University of Technology, Sydney, 2008.

BOURDIEU, P. Homo academicus. Argentina: Les edicion Minuit, 1984.

DEUBEL, P. Punishment or Policy Change: A Case of Plagiarism in a Dissertation. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, v 8, nº 1, 101 – 112, 2018.

ELIOT, T. S. The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism. London: Meutheun and Co. 1922.

LEDUC, M. et. al. Réflexion éthique sur le plagiat dans la recherche scientifique, Centre National de Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), 1 – 18, 2017.

FERREIRA; M. M; PERSIKE, A. O tratamento do plágio no meio acadêmico: o caso USP, Revista Signóstica, v. 26, nº 2, 519 – 540, 2014.

HART, A. G. If you can lose a driving licence, why not a PhD? Nature, v. 430, nº 503, 1 – 2, 2004.

HODDELL, S., STREET, D., WILDBLOOD, H. Doctorates: converging or diverging patterns of provision”, Quality Assurance in Education, v. 10, nº 2, 61-70, 2002.

JALONGO, M. R.; SARACHO, O. N. Writing for Publication Transitions and Tools that Support Scholars’ Success. New York: Springer, 2016.

JAMIESON, S. Is It Plagiarism or Patchwriting? Toward a Nuanced Definition. In: BRETAG, T. (Eds). Handbook of Academic Integrity (pp. 503 – 518), Singapore: Springer, 2016.

JUDENSNAIDER. I. Um olhar histórico à questão da cópia e do plágio. Revista Querubim – revista eletrônica de trabalhos científicos nas áreas de Letras, Ciências Humanas e Ciências Sociais – Ano 07 Nº 15 vol. 1. 161 – 189, 2011.

KROKOSCZ, M. Plagiarism in articles published in journals indexed in the Scientific Periodicals Electronic Library (SPELL): a comparative analysis between 2013 and 2018, International Journal for Educational Integrity, v. 17, nº 1, 2021.

LATOURETTE, A. W.. Plagiarism: Legal and ethical implications for the university. The Journal of College and University Law, 37, 1–91., 1 – 22, 2010.

LINDBERG, D. C.. The Beginnings of Western Science Th e European Scientifi c Tradition in Philosophical, Religious, and Institutional Context, Prehistory to a.d. 1450. Chicago: Th e University of Chicago Press, 2007.

MAURER H, KAPPE F, ZAKA B.. Plagiarism - a survey. J Univ Comp Sci 12: 1050-1084, 2006.

MITCHELL. T.; CARROLL. J. Academic and research misconduct in the PhD: Issues for students and supervisors. Nurse Education Today, v. 28, nº 3, 218 – 226, 2008.

MOORE, J. C. A brief History of Universities, New York: Springer, 2019. 131, 2019.

NERAD, M.; EVANS, B. The Continuing Evolution of the Research Doctorate. In: Globalization and Its Impacts on the Quality of PhD Education (pp. 8 – 29). Boston: Sense Publishers, 2014.

NOBLE, K. Changing Doctoral Degrees: an international perspective (Buckingham, Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press. 1994.

OLIVEIRA, E. C. Autoria de documentos para a WEB semântica: um ambiente de produção de conhecimento baseado em ontologias. (tese de doutorado). Brasília: UNB, 2006.

ÖSTLING. J. Humboldt and the modern German university An intellectual history, Sweden: Lun University Press, 2018.

PARK, C. In Other (People’s) Words: plagiarism by university students—literature and lessons, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 28, nº 5, 471 – 486, 2003.

PEACOCK. S. The PHD by publication. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 123-134, 2017.

PENELOPE, P. N. & CAROLYN, C. G. PhDs by publications: an ‘easy way out’?, Teaching in Higher Education, 17:1, 105-111, 2012.

PENNYCOOK, A. Borrowing others’ words: text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quart 30: 201-230, 1996.

POWELL, S. The Award of the PhD by Published Work, UK Council for Graduate Education, Lichfield, 2004.

RENAUT, L.. Le tatouage des hommes libres aux ive et v e siècles de notre ère », Histoire et sociétés, 16, 11-27 2011.

RESNIK, D. B. The Ethics of Science: An Introduction. London: London and New York, 1998.

RUSSO, M.. Ética e integridade na Ciência: da responsabilidade do cientista à responsabilidade coletiva. Estudos avançados, v.28 n.80, abr. 2014.

RÜEGG, W. A History of the university in Europe: Universities in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, v. iii, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

SELEMANI, A.; CHAWINGA, W. D.; E DUBE, G. Why do postgraduate students commit plagiarism? An empirical study. International Journal for Educational Integrity, v. 14, nº 7, 1 – 15, 2018.

SIMONNOT, B. Le plagiat universitaire, seulement une question d’éthique ? Revue Question de communications, v. 26, nº 3, 219 – 234, 2014.

SCHUYT, K. Scientific Integrity: The Rules of Academic Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019.

VAUX, D. L. Scientific Misconduct: Falsification, Fabrication, and Misappropriation of Credit. In: BRETAG, T. (Eds). Handbook of Academic Integrity (pp. 3 – 7), Singapore: Springer, 2016.

WAGER, E. Defining and responding to plagiarism. Learned Publishing, 27: 33–42, 2014.

WAGNER, M, PORTO, M.; TSVETKOVA, N. The final oral examination, In: The Experience of Examining the PhD An International Comparative Study of Processes and Standards of Doctoral Examination, London: Routledge. (pp. 45 - 55), 2023.

WEBER-WULFF. False Feathers: A Perspective on Academic Plagiarism, New York: Springer, 2014.

WILSON, K. Quality assurance issues for a PhD by published work: a case study”, Quality. Assurance in Education, v. 10 No. 2, pp. 71-8, 2002.

.

Downloads

Publicado

2024-03-13

Como Citar

Alves, F. R. V. (2024). Algumas considerações sobre o Philosophiae Doctor e o plágio acadêmico . Revista Diálogo Educacional, 24(80). https://doi.org/10.7213/1981-416X.24.080.AO05