Larry Laudan’s critiques to social constructivism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/2965-1557.036.e202429471

Abstract

Social constructivism can be taken as a broad sociological-philosophical conception of science which would be introduced as follows: i) an explanation of the success of successful scientific theories ought to be done through the use of epistemological criteria and social community happenings at the construction and acceptance of those theories; ii) the knowledge produced by successful scientific theories, to be effectively taken as a knowledge, ought to be a representation of reality. The social constructivist conception has always been strongly criticized by traditional philosophical conceptions of science because 1) an explanation of the success of successful scientific theories should be made only through the use of epistemological criteria, and 2) the knowledge produced by successful scientific theories indeed is a representation of reality. This paper deals with criticism (1), through an expanded analysis of the debate between a representative of social constructivism (David Bloor) and a critic (Larry Laudan), based on the hypothesis that, although Laudan has pointed out some important limits to the scope of the social constructivist conception, the argumentative core of his critique does not hold, except as a prescription about the tasks of a real philosopher of science.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Marcos Rodrigues da Silva, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Doutor em Filosofia pela Universidade de São Paulo 

Downloads

Published

2024-05-06

How to Cite

Rodrigues da Silva, M. (2024). Larry Laudan’s critiques to social constructivism. Revista De Filosofia Aurora, 36. https://doi.org/10.1590/2965-1557.036.e202429471

Issue

Section

Continuous Flow