Críticas de Rawls a Hobbes e críticas de Habermas a Rawls

Delamar Volpato Dutra

Resumo


O texto apresenta o que considera ser a principal crítica de Rawls a Hobbes, qual seja, de adolescer de um déficit obrigacional decorrente de sua argumentação baseada em uma teoria da decisão racional. Incontinente, apresenta o que considera ser a principal crítica de Habermas a Rawls, qual seja, aquela de um déficit cognitivo decorrente da estratégia argumentativa baseada na posição original. Defende-se que Habermas imputa a Rawls a crítica que este fizera a Hobbes, implicando um déficit deontológico de sua teoria, déficit este que seria inconsistente com a defesa da inviolabilidade da pessoa por ele defendida.


Palavras-chave


Habermas, Rawls, Hobbes, teoria da justiça, contratualismo

Texto completo:

PDF

Referências


APEL, K.-O.; OLIVEIRA, M. A. de; MOREIRA, L. Com Habermas, contra

Habermas: direito, discurso e democracia. São Paulo: Landy, 2004.

ARISTÓTELES. Política [edição bilíngüe]. [Trad. A. C. Amaral e C. C. Gomes]. Lisboa: Vega, 1998.

BAYERTZ, K.; GUTMANN, T. Happiness and Law. Ratio Juris, v. 25, n. 2, p. 236-246, 2012.

BAYERTZ, K.; GUTMANN, T. Happiness and Law. Ratio Juris, v. 25, n. 2, p. 236-246, 2012.

BYRD, B. S.; HRUSCHKA, J. Kant's ‘Doctrine of Right': A Commentary.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

DARWALL, S. Normativity and Projection in Hobbes's Leviathan. The

Philosophical Review, v. 109, n. 3, p. 313-347, 2000.

DARWALL, S. The British Moralists and the Internal ‘Ought': 1640-1740.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

EGGERS, D. Hobbes and Game Theory Revisited: Zero-Sum Games in the State of Nature. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, v. 49, n. 3, p. 193-226, 2011.

GAUTHIER, D. The Logic of Leviathan. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969.

GREGOR, M. J. Law of Freedom: A Study of Kant's Method of Applying the Categorical Imperative in the 'Methapysik der Sitten'. Oxford: Blackwell, 1963.

GREGOR, M. J. Translator's Note on the text of The metaphysics of Morals. In: KANT, I. Practical philosophy. [Transl. Mary Gregor]. [The Cambridge Edition of The Works of Immanuel Kant]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. p. 355-359.

HABERMAS, J. Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des

Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. 4. Auflage, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1994 [1992].

HABERMAS, J. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. [Transl. Ciaran Cronin: Die Einbeziehung desanderen Studien zur politischen Theorie]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998 [1996].

HABERMAS, J. Reconciliation through the Public Use o Reason: Remarks on John Rawls' Political Liberalism. The Journal of Philosophy, New York, v. 92, n. 3, p. 109-31, Marc. 1995.

HAMPTON, J. Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

HART, H. L. A. Rawls on Liberty and its Priority. In DANIELS, Norman [ed.]. Reading Rawls: Critical Studies on Rawls' "A Theory of Justice". Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989 [1973]. p. 230-252.

HOHFELD, W. N. Faulty Analysis in Easement and License Cases. The Yale Law Journal. V. 27, n. 1, p. 66-101, 1917.

HOHFELD, W. N. Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in

Judicial Reasoning. The Yale Law Journal, v. 23, n. 1, p. 16-59, 1913.

KAVKA, G. Right Reason and Natural Law in Hobbes's Ethics. The Monist, v. 66, p. 120-33, 1983.

KAVKA, G. The Rationality of Rule-Following: Hobbes' Dispute with the

Foole. Law and Philosophy, p. 5-34, v. 14, 1995.

MILL, J. S. Utilitarianism and On Liberty. Including Mill's ‘Essay on Bentham' and selections from the writings of Jeremy Bentham and John Austin. [Ed. with an Introduction by Mary Warnock]. 2. Ed., Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.

MOEHLER, M. Why Hobbes' State of Nature is Best Modeled by an Assurance Game. Utilitas, n. 21, p. 297-326, 2009.

OAKESHOTT, M. Hobbes on Civil Association. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2000.

PASQUINO, P. Hobbes, religion, and rational choice: Hobbes's two Leviathans and the Fool. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, v. 82, p. 406-419, 2001.

PÉCHARMAN, M. Le problème du principe des jugements pratiques: Kant critique d'une illusion de Hobbes. In: FOISNEAU, Luc, THOUARD, Denis [ed.]. De la violence à la politique: Kant et Hobbes. Paris: Vrin, 2005. p. 33-54.

PETTIT, P. Made with Words: Hobbes on Language, Mind, and Politics.

Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2008.

RAWLS, J. A Theory of Justice. [Revised Edition]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999 [1971].

RAWLS, J. Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.

TAYLOR, A. E. The Ethical Doctrine of Hobbes. Philosophy, n. 13, p. 406-424, 1938.

ZOFFOLI, E. The Place of Comprehensive Doctrines in Political Liberalism: On Some Common Misgivings About the Subject and Function of the Overlapping Consensus. Res Publica, v. 18, p. 351-366, 2012.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7213/1980-5934.29.047.AO03

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.




Direitos autorais 2017 Editora Universitária Champagnat

Licença Creative Commons
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.