Human enhancement making use of technological incorporations in their biology - Ethical perspective

Freddy Alexander Diaz, Katherin Salazar, Oscar Herrera


Is it ethical or not to enhance the characteristics and capacities of human beings, making use of technological incorporations in their biology? This article presents arguments from both position pros and cons, about technological incorporations in human bodies. The denaturalization of technologically enhanced humans is discussed; A discussion is raised about the impact of these technologies on the population inequality; We present a contrast between whether the research is for treatment or enhancement purposes. Some of the repercussions on a society of humans are analyzed, both hyper connected and technologically enhanced. Some of the future challenges that societies with technologically enhanced humans must face are presented. In conclusion, the development of technologies, within a regulatory and normative framework, to enhancing the characteristics and capacities of human beings is ethical. Because technologically enhanced humans are part of the NBIC convergence, and the NBIC convergence will generate new knowledge that will surely be used to develop clean and safe energy sources, preventive medical treatments that will eliminate diseases such as cancer and HIV, and design strategies to the conservation and decontamination of the planet.


Human enhancement technologies, Ethical, NBIC convergence, Enhanced humans, cyborgs.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)


Bauer, W., Hämmerle, M., Schlund, S., & Vocke, C. (2015). Transforming to a hyper-connected society and economy–towards an “Industry 4.0”. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 417-424.

Clark, A. (2001, August). Natural-born cyborgs?. In International Conference on Cognitive Technology (pp. 17-24). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI

Fakhar Manesh, M., Pellegrini, M. M., Marzi, G., & Dabic, M. (2020). Knowledge Management in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Mapping the Literature and Scoping Future Avenues. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2019.2963489.

Gandotra, E., Bansal, D., & Sofat, S. (2014). Malware analysis and classification: A survey. Journal of Information Security, 2014.

Giesen, K. G. (2018). Transhumanism as the Dominant Ideology of the Fourth Industrial revolution. Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences, 29(3), 189. URL: DOI: 10.3917/jibes.293.0189.

Juengst, E., & Moseley, D., "Human Enhancement", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL:

Mukherjee, S. (2017). The Gene: An Intimate History.

Noorman, M. (2012). Computing and moral responsibility. URL:

Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia (Vol. 5038). New York: Basic Books.

Ochoa, Y. V., Sandoval, Ó. L. H., Espitia, A., Escobar, C. H., & Hurtado, M. Evolución de la bioingeniería y la nanotecnología: desde la biofísica hasta la convergencia científico-tecnológica (NBIC). Ingeciencia, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 1 p. 77-87, Aug. 2017. ISSN 2500-929X. Available at: . Date accessed: 09 nov. 2020

Pruski, M. (2019). What Demarks the Metamorphosis of Human Individuals to Posthuman Entities? The New Bioethics, 25(1), 3-23.

Rawls, J. (1971). VA Theory of Justice.

Vertovšek, N., & Greguric, I. (2018). Philosophy of Future Cyberspaces and the Transhumanistic Reality. Filozofska istraživanja, 38(1), 99-116. DOI:10.21464/fi38108.

Yaacoubi, O. (2019). The rise of encrypted malware. Network Security, 2019(5), 6-9.



  • Não há apontamentos.

Direitos autorais 2020 Editora Universitária Champagnat

Licença Creative Commons
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.