The traditional knowledge from Black communities in the global discourse on biodiversity conservation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7213/rev.dir.econ.soc.v16i1.32229Keywords:
Traditional Knowledge; Black Communities; Biodiversity; Environmental Justice; Racial JusticeAbstract
This paper examines the role of traditional knowledge held by Black communities in the global discourse on biodiversity conservation. To achieve this goal, it identifies the challenges and opportunities for greater participation of Black communities in decision-making processes related to biodiversity conservation policies and instruments. Through a documentary analysis of scientific literature, non-governmental organization reports, and regional and international instruments, the study presents reflections to strengthen the participation of Black communities and safeguard their knowledge. The article underscores the need to incorporate the traditional knowledge of Black communities into conservation strategies. By doing so, not only is biodiversity protected, but environmental and racial justice is promoted, and the resilience of these communities in the face of global environmental challenges is strengthened.
Downloads
References
ACHARYA, Rajshree; RATHORE, Aditi. Protecting Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Culture Expressions Regionally: The SAARC Possibility. Indian Journal of Intellectual Property Law, v. 13, p. 273, 2023. Disponible en: <http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-180-7_117>.
AFRICAN REGIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION. Swakopmund Protocol on the Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Expressions of Folklore, 2010. Disponible en: <https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/201022>.
BARTON, John H. Biodiversity at Rio. BioScience, v. 42, n. 10, p. 773-776, 1992. Disponible en: <https://doi.org/10.2307/1311996>.
BEAR, Leroy Little. Traditional knowledge and humanities: A perspective by a Blackfoot. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, v. 39, n. 4, p. 518-527, 2012.
BERNAL CAMARGO, Diana Rocío. El acceso a recursos genéticos en pueblos indígenas y el Convenio de Diversidad Biológica. Civilizar Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, v. 13, n. 24, p. 47-62, 2013. Disponible en: <https://doi.org/10.22518/16578953.112>.
BULL, Chris. Traditional Knowledge: intellectual property. Without Prejudice, v. 12, n. 7, p. 38-40, 2012. Disponible en: <https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC125536>.
CHAKRABARTI, Gargi. Vulnerable Position of Traditional Knowledge Under IPR: Concern for Sustainable Development. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, v. 7, n. 3, p. 67-94, 2014. Disponible en: <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2480672>.
COOMBE, Rosemary J. Protecting traditional environmental knowledge and new social movements in the americas: Intellectual property, human right, or claims to an alternative form of sustainable development. Florida Journal of International Law, v. 17, p. 115, 2005. Disponible en: <https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/fjil17&i=123>
COSTANTINE, Jovine. The Swakopmund Protocol for the protection of expressions of folklore: a review of implementation in Rwanda and Tanzania. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, v. 17, n. 10, p. 834-843, 2022. Disponible en: <https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac088>
DOTSON, Talia E. Regenerative revolution: planning for regenerative transformation through black ancestral ecological knowledge. Pomona: California State Polytechnic University, 2024.
DUTFIELD, Graham. Intellectual property, biogenetic resources and traditional knowledge. London: Routledge, 2010.
ELLIS, Stephen C. Meaningful consideration? A review of traditional knowledge in environmental decision making. Arctic, 58, p. 66-77, 2005. Disponible en: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/40512668>
ESCOBAR, Arturo. Whose knowledge, whose nature? Biodiversity, conservation, and the political ecology of social movements. Journal of Political Ecology, v. 5, n. 1, p. 53-82, 1998. Disponible en: <https://doi.org/10.2458/v5i1.21397>
FOLKE, Carl. Traditional knowledge in social–ecological systems. Ecology and society, v. 9, n. 3, 2004. Disponible en: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/26267675>
GEBHARDT, L.; DU PLESSIS, D. J. Examining The Challenges Of Intellectual Property Commercialisation On The Realisation of the Swakopmund Protocol. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, v. 35, p. 3537-3550, 2023. Disponible en: <https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v35i.4244>
GORDON, David; KRECH III, Shepard. Indigenous knowledge and the environment in Africa and North America. Columbus: Ohio University Press, 2012.
HÅGVAR, Sigmund. The relevance of the Rio-Convention on biodiversity to conserving the biodiversity of soils. Applied Soil Ecology, v. 9, n. 1-3, p. 1-7, 1998. Disponible en: <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(98)00115-2>
HENS, Luc. Indigenous knowledge and biodiversity conservation and management in Ghana. Journal of Human Ecology, v. 20, n. 1, p. 21-30, 2006. Disponible en: <https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2006.11905897>
HUGHES, Alice; GRUMBINE, R. Edward. The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework: what it does and does not do, and how to improve it. Frontiers in Environmental Science, v. 11, p. 1281536, 2023. Disponible en: <https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1281536>
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION. Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989. Disponible en: <https://normlex.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C169>
KUTI, Temitope. Implementation of Traditional Knowledge Protection Mechanisms in Africa: The Challenge of Trans-boundary Traditional Knowledge. SSRN Working Paper, n. 3318662, 2019. Disponible en: <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3318662>
LUNA-GALVÁN, Mauricio; VARGAS-CHAVES, Iván. Approaching resilience for climate change adaptation in complex environments. European Journal of Sustainable Development, v. 7, n. 3, p. 255-264, 2018. Disponible en: <https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n3p255>
MARDERO, Sofia, et al. Traditional knowledge for climate change adaptation in Mesoamerica: A systematic review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, v. 7, n. 1, p. 100473, 2023. Disponible en: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100473>
MARTÍNEZ, Arturo J. The Convention on Biological Diversity as a tool for encouraging international cooperation in bioprospecting. En : II WOCMAP Congress Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Part 1: Biological Resources, Sustainable Use, Conservation and Ethnobotany, p. 145-150, 1997.
MCGREGOR, Deborah. Traditional Knowledge. International Indigenous Policy Journal, v. 3, n. 3, p. 1-21, 2012. Disponible en: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/48766857>
MENA MOSQUERA, Audrey. El derecho al conocimiento tradicional en las comunidades negras. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre Editores, 2022.
MUNZER, Stephen; RAUSTIALA, Kal. The uneasy case for intellectual property rights in traditional knowledge. Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, v. 27, p. 37, 2009. Disponible en: <https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/caelj27&i=39>
NEMOGÁ-SOTO, Gabriel Ricardo. Es responsabilidad de todos resolver el problema de acceso. Revista Colombiana de Biotecnología, v. 8, n. 1, p. 3-4, 2006. Disponible en: <https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/biotecnologia/article/view/508>
NWAUCHE, Enyinna S. The Swakopmund Protocol and the communal ownership and control of expressions of folklore in Africa. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, v. 17, n. 5-6, p. 191-201, 2014. Disponible en: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwip.12027>
OGUAMANAM, Chidi. A critical examination of the African legal framework for indigenous knowledge. Journal of African Law, v. 67, n. 1, p. 1-21, 2023. Disponible en: <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855323000049>
OLSSON, Per; FOLKE, Carl. Local ecological knowledge and institutional dynamics for ecosystem management: a study of Lake Racken watershed, Sweden. Ecosystems, v. 4, p. 85-104, 2001. Disponible en: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s100210000061>
POSEY, Darrell Addison; DUTFIELD, Graham. Beyond intellectual property: toward traditional resource rights for indigenous peoples and local communities. Otawa: IDRC, 1996.
SCHAFER, Adalberto Gularte; REIS, Enir Girondi. Artisanal fishing areas and traditional ecological knowledge: The case study of the artisanal fisheries of the Patos Lagoon estuary (Brazil). Marine Policy, v. 32, n. 3, p. 283-292, 2008. Disponible en: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2007.06.001>
SCHRÖTER, Matthias, et al. Science on ecosystems and people to support the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Ecosystems and People, v. 19, n. 1, p. 2220913, 2023. Disponible en: <https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2023.2220913>
SELVARAJ, John Josephraj; PORTILLA-CABRERA, Cristiam Victoriano. Impact of climate change on Colombian Pacific coast mangrove bivalves distribution. Iscience, v. 27, n. 8, 2024. Disponible en: <https://www.cell.com/iscience/fulltext/S2589-0042(24)01698-5>
SQUIRES, Dale. Biodiversity Conservation in A sia. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, v. 1, n. 1, p. 144-159, 2014. Disponible en: <https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.13>
THORNTON, Thomas; SCHEER, Adela Maciejewski. Collaborative engagement of local and traditional knowledge and science in marine environments: a review. Ecology and Society, v. 17, n. 3, 2012. Disponible en: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269064>
TITTOR, Anne, et al. ¿De quién es y quién decide sobre la biodiversidad?: Un análisis crítico del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica. Ecología Política, v. 66, p. 35-42, 2023. Disponible en: <https://www.ecologiapolitica.info/producte/de-quien-es-y-quien-decide-sobre-la-biodiversidad/>
UNITED NATIONS. Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Disponible en: <https://www.cbd.int/gbf>
UNITED NATIONS. The Convention on Biological Diversity, 1992. Disponible en: <https://www.cbd.int/convention/text>
UPRETY, Yadav, et al. Contribution of traditional knowledge to ecological restoration: practices and applications. Ecoscience, v. 19, n. 3, p. 225-237, 2012. Disponible en: <https://doi.org/10.2980/19-3-3530>
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Iván Vargas-Chaves
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Economic and Socio-Environmental Law the right of first publication with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International which allows sharing the work with recognition of the authors and its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this Journal (eg.: publishing in institutional repository or as a book), with a recognition of its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (see the Effect of Open Access).
