Is the nationalization of civil society desirable? Thoughts based on the examples of the National Policy for Social Participation (2014) and the National Plan for Arts Promotion (2020)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7213/revdireconsoc.v14i1.29412Abstract
This article, written under the premise of ontological relationality and contraposition between State and civil society, aims to reflect on the desirability of legalization and control of social spheres by the government. Using exploratory bibliographic research, it addresses this issue critically from two state acts edited in Brazil under the command of different ideological matrices: The National Policy for Social Participation, 2014, and the National Plan for Arts Promotion, 2020. Initially, this is accomplished by analyzing the so-called June Journeys of 2013 occurred in the country, which are understood as the context for formulating and editing the Decree no. 8,243/2014, which created the National Policy for Social Participation. Afterwards, the concept of civil society inserted in that Decree is exposed, comparing it with the theoretical framework on the theme. Finally, based on this theoretical framework, each of the aforementioned state act is faced, concluding that both are undesirable, since they reveal an autocratic assumption of subtracting from civil society and art their elementary characteristics of being alive and independent.
Downloads
References
ALVIM, Roberto. Pronunciamento de Roberto Alvim na Secretaria Especial da Cultura. Disponível em: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6f0qseVdfhk&feature=youtu.be>. Acesso em: 17 fev. 2020.
BONFIGLI, Fiammetta e SCHWARTZ, Germano. Jornadas de Junho? Movimentos Sociais e Direito nas Ruas de Porto Alegre. Canoas: Unilasalle, 2017.
BUBER, Martin. Zwischen Gesellschaft und Staat. Heidelberg: Lambert Schneider, 1952.
COHEN, Jean; ARATO, Andrew. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1994.
CUNHA FILHO, Marcio Camargo; GUIMARÃES FILHO, Paulo André Caminha. Por que temer o povo? O Debate sobre o Sistema Nacional de Participação Social (Decreto n. 8.243/14). In: Direito & Práxis, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 06, n. 12, p. 104-133, 2015.
DILTHEY, Wilhelm. Einführung in die Geisteswissenschaften. Erweiterte Aufgaben. Altenmünster: Jazzybee, 2012.
EDWARDS, Michael. Civil Society. Oxford: Polity Press, 2004.
EHRLICH, Eugen. Fundamentos da Sociologia do Direito. Tradução de René Ernani Gertz. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília, 1986.
FERGUSON, Adam. An Essay on the History of Civil Society. 2ª ed. London: A. Millar e T. Cadell, 1768.
FREITAS, Juarez. A Interpretação Sistemática do Direito. 4ª ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2004.
GOSEWINKEL, Dieter e RUCHT, Dieter. “History meets sociology”: Zivilgesellschaft als Prozess. In: GOSEWINKEL, Dieter et al (org.). Zivilgesellschaft: national und transnational. Berlin: edition sigma, 2004.
GRAMSCI, Antonio. Quaderni del Carcere. Vol. III. Torino: Einaudi, 1977.
GRAU, Eros Roberto. A Ordem Econômica na Constituição de 1988: interpretação e crítica. 3ª ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 1997.
GUARINI, Elena Fasano. Machiavelli and the crisis of the Italian republics. In: BOCK, Gisela; SKINNER, Quentin; VIROLI, Maurizio (org.). Machiavelli and Republicanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993
GÜNZEL, Angelika. Der Dialog mit den repräsentativen Verbänden un der Zivilgesellschaft. In: JuWiss (org.). Kollektivität: Öffentliches Recht zwischen Gruppeninteressen und Gemeinwohl. 52. Assistententagung Öffentliches Recht. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2012.
HAEBERLIN, Mártin. Uma Teoria do Interesse Público: fundamentos do Estado Meritocrático de Direito. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2017.
HALL, John. Civil Society: Theory, History, Comparison. New Jersey: Wiley, 1995.
HALLBERG, Peter; WITTROCK, Björn. From koinonìa politikè to societas civilis: Birth, Disappearance and First Renaissance of the Concept. In: WAGNER, Peter (ed.). The languages of civil society. New York: Berghahn Books, 2006.
HATTENHAUER, Hans (org.). Thibaut und Savigny: ihre programmatischen Schriften. München: Vahlen, 2002.
HEGEL, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Leipzig: Felix Meiner, 1911. Disponível em: <https://archive.org/details/grundlinienderp00gansgoog>. Acesso em 31 jan. 2022.
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Sobre a Essência da Verdade. Tradução de Carlos Morujão. Edição Bilíngüe. Lisboa: Porto, 1995.
HITTINGER, Russel. The Coherence of the Four Basic Principles of Catholic Social Doctrine: An Interpretation. In: ARCHER, Margaret e DONATI, Pierpaolo (ed.). Pursuing the Common Good: How Solidarity and Subsidiarity Can Work Together. Vatican City: Pontificia Academia, 2008.
HOBBES, Thomas. De cive. Edição online desenvolvida a partir do texto publicado em Londres, pela J.C. for Royston, em 1651 (reprodução online sob os direitos de Blackmask). Disponível em . Acesso em 31 jan. 2022.
HOBBES, Thomas. Leviathan. Oregon: University of Oregon, 1999. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 31 jan. 2022.
HODGKINSON, Virginia e FOLEY, Michael (ed.). The Civil Society Reader. London: University Press of New England, 2003.
HÖFFE, Otfried. O que é Justiça? Tradução de Peter Neumann. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 2003.
ILTING, K. H. Hegel’s concept of the state and Marx’s early critique. In: PELCZYNSKI, Z. A. (ed.). The State and Civil Society: Studies in Hegel’s Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
ILTING, K. H. The dialectic of civil society. In: PELCZYNSKI, Z. A. (ed.). The State and Civil Society: Studies in Hegel’s Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
KEANE, John. Democracy and Civil Society. London: University of Westminster Press, 1998.
KORTIAN, Garbis. Subjectivity and civil society. In: PELCZYNSKI, Z. A. (ed.). The State and Civil Society: Studies in Hegel’s Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
LUHMANN, Niklas. Sociologia do Direito I. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1983.
MASCAREÑO, Aldo. Introducción. In: Diferenciación y contingencia en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Universidad Alberto Hurtado, 2010.
MACHIAVELLI, Niccolò. Discorsi la prima Deca di Tito Livio. Firenze: Einaudi, 1971. Disponível em: <http://www.letteraturaitaliana.net/pdf/Volume_4/t91.pdf>. Acesso em 31 jan. 2022.
MACHIAVELLI, Niccolò. Il Principe. Torino: Einaudi, 1961. Disponível em: <http://www.letteratura italiana.net/pdf/Volume_4/t324.pdf>. Acesso em 31 jan. 2022.
MÜHSAM, Erich. Die Befreiung der Gesellschaft vom Staat. Organizado por Eckhard Henkel. Königswinter: Subach, 2012.
NAJEMY, John. Society, Class, and state in Machiavelli’s Discourses on Livy. In: NAJEMY, John (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Machiavelli. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
NOGUEIRA, Marcos Aurélio. As Ruas e a Democracia. Ensaios sobre o Brasil contemporâneo. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Astrojildo Pereira: Contraponto, 2013.
O’CONNEL, Brian. Civil Society: The Underpinnings of American Democracy. New Hampshire: University Press of New England, 1999.
OST, François. O Tempo do Direito. Lisboa: Calouste Gulbenkian, 1998.
PELCZYNSKI, Z. A. Introduction: The significance of Hegel's separation of the state and civil society. In: PELCZYNSKI, Z. A. (ed.). The State and Civil Society: Studies in Hegel’s Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
PELCZYNSKI, Z. A. Nation, civil society, state: Hegelian sources of the Marxian non-theory of nationality. In: PELCZYNSKI, Z. A. (ed.). The State and Civil Society: Studies in Hegel’s Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
PELCZYNSKI, Z. A. Political community and individual freedom in Hegel’s philosophy of state. In: PELCZYNSKI, Z. A. (ed.). The State and Civil Society: Studies in Hegel’s Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
POPPER, Karl. The Open Society and its Enemies. Routledge Classics. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.
PREUß, Ulrich. Zum staatsrechtlichen Begriff des Öffentlichen: untersucht am Beispiel des verfassungsrechtlichen Status kultureller Organisationen. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett, 1969.
PUTNAM, Robert. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.
ROUSSEAU, Jean-Jacques. Du contrat social ou Principes du droit politique. Edição online desenvolvida a partir do texto publicado em Paris, pela Union Générale d’Éditions, em 1762. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 31 jan. 2022.
SAVIGNY, Friedrich Carl von. Vom Beruf unserer Zeit für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft. Heidelberg: Mohr und Zimmer, 1814. Disponível em: <http://www.deutschestextarchiv.de/book/show/ savigny_gesetzgebung_1814>. Acesso em 31 jan. 2022.
SCHWARTZ, Germano. As Constituições estão mortas? Momentos Constituintes e Comunicações Constitucionalizantes dos Novos Movimentos Sociais do Século XXI. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2018.
SIEVERS, Bruce. Civil Society, Philanthropy, and the Fate of Commons. London: University Press of New England, 2010.
TAVIS, Timothy e TAVIS, Lee. The Person, the Market, and the Community. In: HODGSON, Bernard (ed.). The Invisible Hand and the Common Good. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2004.
TERRIER, Jean e WAGNER, Peter. Civil Society and the Problématique of Political Modernity. In: WAGNER, Peter (ed.). The languages of civil society. New York: Berghahn Books, 2006.
TOCQUEVILLE, Alexis de. A Democracia na América. Tradução de Eduardo Brandão. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1998.
VIROLI, Maurizio. Machiavelli and the republican idea of politics. In: BOCK, Gisela; SKINNER, Quentin; VIROLI, Maurizio (org.). Machiavelli and Republicanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
WALTON, A. S. Economy, utility and community in Hegel's theory of civil society. In: PELCZYNSKI, Z. A. (ed.). The State and Civil Society: Studies in Hegel’s Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
WEBER, Thadeu. Ética e Filosofia Política: Hegel e o formalismo kantiano. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 1999.
ZALESKI, Pawel. Tocqueville on Civilian Society: A Romantic Vision of the Dichotomic Structure of Social Reality. In: Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, vol. 50, 2008. Disponível em: <http://pzaleski.republika.pl/2008%20tocqueville%20on%20civilian%20society. pdf>. Acesso em: 31 jan. 2022.
ZIELINSKI, Dioleno Zella; PECCININ, Luiz Eduardo. O Decreto n. 8.243/2014 e a Participação Social na Formulação de Políticas Públicas. In: BATISTA, Gustavo Barbosa de Mesquita; GONÇALVES, Rogério Magnus Varela; STRAPAZZON, Carlos Luiz (coord.). Direitos Sociais e Políticas Públicas I. Florianópolis: CONPEDI, 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mártin Haeberlin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Economic and Socio-Environmental Law the right of first publication with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International which allows sharing the work with recognition of the authors and its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this Journal (eg.: publishing in institutional repository or as a book), with a recognition of its initial publication in this Journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (see the Effect of Open Access).
