Designing hypercitizenship methodologically

Andrea Pitasi

Resumo


This paper is essentially epistemological and methodological and is aimed at designing the hypercitizen methodological toolkit. It is not merely through an indicator based approach but also on a modelling based approach and a metatheoretical one (Stepanic et al., 2005: 858). Conceptually, it evolves by reframing the key global changes of our times under the emer-gence of hypercitizenship from a multidimensional convergence among different kinds of citizenship Pitasi, 2013; Pitasi- Angrisani , 2013): cosmopolitan (Beck, 2006), scientific (Nowotny, 2008), societarian (Donati, 1993), entrepreneurial (I evolved by reinterpreting Audretsch, 2007 who, properly, copes with the “entrepreneurial society” not the entrepre-neurial citizenship).The four dimensions are shaped systemically (Luhmann, 1990, 1997) through a social free energy/social entropy coding (Stepanic et al., 2005: 860). 

Palavras-chave


Hypercitizen; systemic approach; cosmopolitan; Malthus Trap.

Texto completo:

PDF

Referências


Audretsch D (2007) The Enterpreneurial Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Beck U. (2006) The Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Chew M.M. (2014) Rethinking the Relationship Between Intellectuals and Na-tionalism, Current

Sociology,62:3.

Clapham C. and Nicholson J. (2009) Oxford Concise Dictionary of Mathematics. London -New York: Oxford U. Press.

Constable S. and Wright R.E.(2011) Guide to the 50 Economic Indicators That Really Matter. New York: Harper Business.

DawkinsR (1976) Il gene egoista. Milano: Mondadori.

Dominici G.-Pitasi A. (2012) Reframing the Systemic Approach to Complex Organizations as Intangible Portfolios in:Nuova Atlantide. Rome: Aracne Publishing.

Donati P (1993) La cittadinanza societaria. Rome-Bari: Laterza.

Harris J (2007) Enhancing Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

N. Luhmann (1988) Warum AGIL? In: Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozi-alpsychologie.

Luhmann N (1990) Essays on Self Reference. New York: Columbia University Press.

Luhmann N (1996) Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Luhmann N (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhr-kamp Verlag.

Luhmann N (2010) Soziologische Aufklaerung. Opladen: WestdeutscherVerlag.

Kaufmann S (2000) Investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Designing hypercitizenship methodologically

Malthus TR (2004)An essay on the Principle of Population. New York-London: W.W. Norton.

Nowotny H (2008) Insatiable Curiosity-Innovation in a Fragile Future. USA and London: Cambridge.

Ortega y Gasset J (1963) Man and People. New York: Norton.

Pearce F (2010) The On Coming Population Crash. Boston: Beacon Press.

Pitasi A. (2012) Systemic Shifts in Sociology. In: Mancini G and AUTHOR A (eds) Systemic Shifts in Sociology. Saarbruecken: Lambert Academic Publishing.

Paolone G. -Pitasi A. (2013) Comparing Systemic Business Paradigms: Chance, Complexity, Communication and Evolutionary Strategies, Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.

Pitasi A. (2011a) (et all). Systemic Shift in Sociology. Saarbrücken: LAP LAM-BERT Academic Publishing.

Pitasi A. (2012a), The Hypercitizenship Challenge to Methodological National-ism. REDES –Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade. Centro Universitário La Salle –UniLasalle

Pitasi A. (2012b) What is sociology for? World Futures Journal68: 221-224.

Pitasi A. (2012c) Hypercitizenship and the Management of Genetic Diversity: Sociology of Law and the Key Systemic Bifurcation Between the Ring Singularity and the Neofeudal Age. World Futures Journal68:314-331.

Pitasi A. (2011b) The Hyperhuman World: Legal Systems and Social Complexity. Saarbrücken : LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.

Pitasi A. (2013) Epilogue: The Fourth Paradigm Redesigning Evolutionary Com-plex Systems Of Organizational Communication. In: Mancini G and Angrisani R (eds) Mapping Systemic Knowledge. Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.

Pitasi A. (2013) Hypercitizenship And The Evolution Of A Global Identity. Jour-nal of Sociological Research4(2). ISSN:1948-5468.

Plüss C (2013) Migrants Social Positioning and inequalities. The Intersections of Capitals, Locations and Aspirations. International Sociology28(1).

Rose N (2009) La politica della vita. Turin: Einaudi.

Schürmann R (1987) Heidegger on Being and Active: From Principles to Anar-chy. Trans. Christine-Marie Gros. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana Univer-sity Press.

Smith LC (2011) The World in 2050. London: Penguin.

Stepanic J and Sabol G and MS Zebec (2005) Describing Social Systems using free social Energy and social entropy. Kybernetes34(6): 857-868.

Toffler A and Toffler H (2006) Reviolutionary Wealth. London: Doubleday.

Xiaoying Q (2012) A Case Study of Globalized Knowledge Flows: Guanxi in Social Science and Management Theory. Interenational Sociology27(6).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7213/rev.dir.econ.socioambienta.05.001.AO01

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.




Direitos autorais 2017 Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental

Licença Creative Commons
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição - NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.

eISSN 2179-8214

Licença Creative Commons
Este trabalho está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.

Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155, Bloco Vermelho, Prado Velho, Curitiba/PR, Brasil, CEP 80.215-901

E-mail: revista.direito@pucpr.br

https://periodicos.pucpr.br/index.php/direitoeconomico/