The European Court of Human Rights and its impact on domestic legal systems

Autores

  • Sarah Cassella Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7213/rev.dir.econ.soc.v11i2.27755

Palavras-chave:

European Court of Human Rights, domestic legal systems, public law, constitution, balance of powers.

Resumo

The European Court of Human Rights was created in order to supervise a rather classical legal instrument. But some peculiarities since its origins and several evolutions led to the establishment of a true “European public order” under its influence. This paper questions the possibility to consider the ECtHR as a “constitutional judge” and analyzes some of the most important changes it has produced in the domestic legal systems – above all in the public institutions – of the States parties to the European convention on human rights.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Sarah Cassella, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná

Professor dos Cursos de Graduação em Direito e dos Programas de Pós-Graduação stricto sensu em Direito da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná e da Universidade Federal do Paraná (Curitiba-PR, Brasil). Doutor e Mestre em Direito do Estado pela Universidade Federal do Paraná. Diretor Acadêmico do NINC – Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais do PPGD-UFPR (www.ninc.com.br). Líder do NUEPD – Núcleo de Pesquisas em Políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Humano do PPGD-PUCPR. Coordenador Executivo, pelo Brasil, da Rede Docente Eurolatinoamericana de Derecho Administrativo. Membro do Foro Iberoamericano de Derecho Administrativo e da Asociación de Derecho Público del Mercosur. Advogado. E-mail: [email protected]

Referências

ANDRIANTSIMBAZOVINA, Joël. La prise en compte de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme par le Conseil constitutionnel, continuité ou évolution? Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel, n. 18, 2005.

ARCARI, Maurizio; NINATTI, Stefania. Narratives of Constitutionalization in the European Union Court of Justice and in the European Court of Human Rights Case Law. ICL JOURNAL, v. 11, n. 01, p 11-41, 2017.

CALIGIURI, Andrea; NAPOLETANO, Nicola. Application of the ECHR in the Domestic Systems. The Italian Yearbook of international law, v. 20, p. 125-159, 2010.

CONSEIL CONSTITUTIONNEL. Décision n° 71-44 DC, 16 juillet 1971. Available at: <https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/decision/1971/7144DC.htm#:~:text=Consid%C3%A9rant%20que%20la%20loi%20d%C3%A9f%C3%A9r%C3%A9e,2.>. Access on: 25 oct. 2020.

CONSEIL CONSTITUTIONNEL. Décision n° 8-155 DC, 30 décembre 1982. Available at: <https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/decision/1982/82155DC.htm>. Access on : 29 oct. 2020.

CONSEIL CONSTITUTIONNEL. Décision n° 86-217 DC, 18 décembre 1986. Available at: <https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/decision/1986/86217DC.htm>. Access on: 28 oct. 2020.

CONSEIL CONSTITUTIONNEL. Décision n° 87-237 DC, 30 décembre 1987. Available at: <https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/decision/1987/87237DC.htm>. Access on: 29 oct. 2020.

CONSEIL CONSTITUTIONNEL. Décision n° 89-271 DC, 11 janvier 1990. Available at: <https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/decision/1990/89271DC.htm>. Access on: 28 oct. 2020.

CONSEIL CONSTITUTIONNEL. Décision n° 93-325 DC, 13 août 1993. Available at: <https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/decision/1993/93325DC.htm>. Access on: 28 oct. 2020.

CONSEIL CONSTITUTIONNEL. Décision n° 94-343/344 DC, 27 juillet 1994. Available at: <https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/decision/1994/94343_344DC.htm>. Access on: 28 oct. 2020.

CONSEIL CONSTITUTIONNEL. Décision n° 99- 416 DC, 23 juillet 1999a. Available at: <https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/decision/1999/99416DC.htm>. Access on: 28 oct. 2020.

CONSEIL CONSTITUTIONNEL. Décision n° 99-422 DC, 21 décembre 1999b. Available at: <https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/les-decisions/decision-n-99-422-dc-du-21-decembre-1999-saisine-par-60-deputes>. Access on: 29 oct. 2020.

CONSEIL CONSTITUTIONNEL. Décision n° 2003-484 DC, 20 novembre 2003a. Available at: <https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/decision/2003/2003484DC.htm>. Access on: 28 oct. 2020.

CONSEIL CONSTITUTIONNEL. Décision n° 2003- 467 DC, 13 mars 2003b. Available at: <https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/actualites/communique/decision-n-2003-467-dc-du-13-mars-2003-communique-de-presse>. Access on: 28 oct. 2020.

COUNCIL OF EUROPE. Annual Report of the Committee of Ministers. 2019. Available at: <https://www.coe.int/en/web/execution/annual-reports>. Access on: 30 oct. 2020.

COUNCIL OF EUROPE. Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights. Available at: <https://www.coe.int/en/web/impact-convention-human-rights#/search/countries/France>. Access on: 26 oct. 2020.

COUNCIL OF EUROPE. Protocol No. 11 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, restructuring the control machinery established thereby, 11 may 1994. Available at: <https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168007cda9>. Access on : 26 oct. 2020.

EU CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. Constitution France. Available at: <https://fra.europa.eu/en/law-reference/constitution-3>. Access on: 25 oct. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Al Skeini and others v. the United Kingdom, application no. 55721/072011. Judgment of the 7th July 2011. Available at: <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-105606%22]%7D>. Access on: 03 nov. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia, applications nos. 11157/04 and 15162/052013. Judgment of the 4th July 2013. Available at: <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=003-4425069-5319054&filename=003-4425069-5319054.pdf>. Access on: 29 oct. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Annual Report. 2019. Available at: <https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Annual_report_2019_ENG.pdf>. Access on: 25 oct. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Assanidzé v. Georgia, application no. 71503/01. Judgment of the 8th April 2004a. Available at: <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=002-4416&filename=002-4416.pdf&TID=ihgdqbxnfi>. Access on: 29 oct. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Bankovic and others v. Belgium and others, application no. 52207/99. Judgement of the 12th December 2001. Available at: <https://casebook.icrc.org/case-study/echr-bankovic-and-others-v-belgium-and-16-other-states>. Access on: 03 nov. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Broniowski v. Poland, application no. 31443/96. Judgment of the 22nd June 2004b. Available at: <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=002-3696&filename=002-3696.pdf&TID=ihgdqbxnfi>. Access on: 29 oct. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Baka v. Hungary, application no. 20261/12. Judgment of the 23rd June 2016. Available at: <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx?i=001-144139>. Access on: 29 oct. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocols No. 11 and No. 14. 1950. Available at: <https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/0900001680063765#:~:text=Article%2035%20%E2%80%93%20Admissibility%20criteria,the%20final%20decision%20was%20taken.>. Access on: 25 oct. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Djaid v. France, application n° 38687/972009. Judgment of the 29th September 1999a. Available at: <http://echr.ketse.com/doc/38687.97-en-19990929/>. Access on: 30 oct. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Hirsi Jamaa and others v. Italy, application no. 27765/09. Judgment of the 23rd February 2012. Available at: <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/spa?i=001-109231>. Access on: 03 nov. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Ilascu and others v. Moldova and Russia, application no. 48787/992004. Judgment of the 8th July 2004c. Available at: <https://www.refworld.org/cases,ECHR,414d9df64.html>. Access on: 03 nov. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Interlaken Declaration - High Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights. 19th February 2010. Available at: <https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/2010_Interlaken_FinalDeclaration_ENG. pdf>. Access on: 29 oct. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Internet: case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. 2015. Available at: <https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Research_report_internet_ENG.pdf>. Access on: 01 nov. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Loizidou v. Turkey, application no. 15318/89. Judgment of 18th December 1996. Available at: <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-58007&filename=001-58007.pdf>. Access on: 27 oct. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Marckx v. Belgium, application no. 6833/741979. Judgment of the 13th June 1979. Available at: <https://rm.coe.int/1680597b14>. Access on: 30 oct. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. McGonnell v. the United Kingdom, application no. 28488/952000. Judgment of the 8th February 2000. Available at: <https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/190896/pdf/>. Access on: 29 oct. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Micallef v. Malta, application no. 17056/06. Judgment of 15th October 2009a. Available at: <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-95031&filename=001-95031.pdf&TID=aauoturhlg>. Access on: 26 oct. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Prisoners’ right to vote. 2019b. Available at: <https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/fs_prisoners_vote_eng.pdf>. Access on: 01 nov. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Ruiz Mateos v. Spain, application no. 12952/87. Judgment of the 23rd June 1993. Available at: <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf?library=ECHR&id=001-83260&filename=RUIZ-MATEOS%20v.%20SPAIN.pdf>. Access on : 01 nov. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Tatar v. Romania, application no 67021/01. Judgment of 27th January 2009b. Available at: <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx?i=003-2615810-2848789>. Access on: 27 oct. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. United Communist party of Turkey and others v. Turkey, application n° 133/1996/752/951. Judgment of the 30th January 1998. Available at: <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/pages/search.aspx?i=001-58128>. Access on: 29 oct. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Vogt v. Germany, application no. 17851/911995. Judgment of the 26th September 1995. Available at: <https://adsdatabase.ohchr.org/IssueLibrary/ECtHR_Case%20of%20Rangelov%20v.%20Germany.docx>. Access on : 01 nov. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Wille v. Liechtenstein, application no. 28396/951999. Judgment of the 28th October 1999b. Available at: <https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/CP_Liechtenstein_eng.pdf>. Access on: 30 oct. 2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Zielinski, Pradal, Gonzalez and al. v. France, joined applications nos. 24846/94 and 34165/96 to 34173/961999. Judgment of the 28th October 1999c. Available at: <http://zip.net/bytqh3>. Access on : 01 nov. 2020.

FRANCE. Conseil d’Etat, Gardedieu, arrêt du 8 février 2007. Available at: <https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/ceta/id/CETATEXT000018005399/>. Access on : 29 oct. 2020.

FRANCE. Décret n° 2006-964, du 1er août 2006 modifiant la partie réglementaire du code de justice administrative. Available at: <https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000000817686/>. Access on: 30 oct. 2020.

GRÜNWALDOVÁ, Vladimíra Pejchalová. General and Particular Approaches to Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights. Annuaire canadien de droit international, vol. 55, p. 248-292, 2017.

ITALY. Corte di Cassazione (Sez. I penale). Somogyi, 3 October 2006, No. 32678, IYIL, Vol. XVI, 2006.

MATHIEU, Bertrand. Les décisions du Conseil constitutionnel et de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme: Coexistence – Autorité – Conflits – Régulation. Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel, n. 32, 2011.

MURKENS, Jo Eric Khushal. Comparative Constitutional Law in the Courts: Reflections on the Originalists’ Objections. Verfassung und Recht in Übersee, v. 41, issue 1, p. 31-50, 2008.

NOLLKAEMPER, Andre. Effect of the ECHR and Judgments of the ECtHR on National Law - Comments on the Paper of Enzo Cannizzaro. The Italian Yearbook of international law, v. 19, p. 189-197, 2009.

PELLET, Alain. La ratification par la France de la convention européenne des droits de l’homme. Revue du Droit Public et de la Science Politique en France et à l'Étranger, p. 1319-1377, 1974.

SAINT-BONNET, François. La liberté des Modernes et la partition de l’espace. Droit & Philosophie, p. 15-30, 2015.

SAUVÉ, Jean-Marc. Le principe de proportionnalité, protecteur des libertés. 2017. Available at: <https://www.conseil-etat.fr/actualites/discours-et-interventions/le-principe-de-proportionnalite-protecteur-des-libertes>. Access on: 02 nov. 2020.

TREATY ON EUROPEAN UNION. Official Journal 115, 09 may 2008. Available at: <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:12008M006:EN:HTML>. Access on: 26 oct. 2020.

UNITED NATIONS. Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. 2001. Available at: <https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/9_6_2001.pdf>. Access on : 25 oct. 2020.

Downloads

Publicado

2020-12-28

Como Citar

CASSELLA, Sarah. The European Court of Human Rights and its impact on domestic legal systems. Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental, Curitiba, v. 11, n. 2, p. 3–23, 2020. DOI: 10.7213/rev.dir.econ.soc.v11i2.27755. Disponível em: https://periodicos.pucpr.br/direitoeconomico/article/view/27755. Acesso em: 22 dez. 2024.

Edição

v. 11 n. 2 (2020): maio/agosto

Seção

Artigos

Licença

Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

  1. Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
  2. Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
  3. Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).

Artigos Semelhantes

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.