Intentionality: A philosophical-cognitive approach to mental representations


  • Cleverson Leite Bastos Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná
  • Tomas Rodolfo Drunkenmolle Harvard University



This article critically analyses the notion of intentionality from several philosophical cognitive points of view. The authors argue that the notion of mental representation in the wider sense and intentionality in the narrower sense remains elusive despite accommodated paradoxes, improved semantic precision and more sophisticated strategies in dealing with intentionality. We will argue that different approaches to intentionality appear to be coherent in their inferences. However, most of them become contradictory and mutually exclusive when juxtaposed and applied to borderline questions. While the explanatory value of both philosophy of mind as well as cognitive psychology should not be underestimated, we must note that not even hard-core neuroscience has been able to pin point what is going on in our minds, let alone come up with a clear cut explanation how it works or a definition of what thought really is. To date, however, intentionality is the best of all explanatory models regarding mental representations.


Não há dados estatísticos.


BAKER, L. R. Explaining Attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995;

BARON-COHEN, S. Mindblindness: an essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995;

BLOCK, N. J. Advertisement for a semantics for psychology. In: FRENCH, P.; UEHLING, T. E.; WETTSTEIN, H. (Ed.). Studies in the Philosophy of Mind. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986. p. 615-678. (Midwest Studies, 10);

BYRNE, R.; WHITEN, A. Machiavellian intelligence: social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes and humans. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991;

CHISHOLM, R. M. Sentences about believing. In: FEIGL, H.; SCRIVEN, M.; MAXELL, G. (Ed.). Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1958. v. 2. p. 510-520;

DAVIDSON, D. Mental events. In: FOSTER, L.; SWANSON, J. W. (Ed.). Experience and theory. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1970. p. 79-101;

DENNETT, D. Brainstorms. Montgomery: Bradford Books, 1978;

DENNETT, D. Intentional systems. Journal of Philosophy, v. 68, p. 87-106, 1971;

DENNETT, D. Intentional systems in cognitive ethology: the “panglossian paradigm”defended. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, v. 6, p. 343-390, 1983;

DENNETT, D. The intentional stance. Cambridge: Bradford Books; MIT Press, 1987;

DENNETT, D. Real Patterns. Journal of Philosophy, v. 87, n. 27-51, 1991;

DENNETT, D. Kinds of minds. New York: Basic Books, 1996;

DEVITT, M. Designation. New York: Columbia University Press, 1981;

DRETSKE, F. Explaining behavior. Cambridge: Bradford Books; MIT Press, 1988;

EYSENCK, M. W.; KEANE, M. T. Cognitive Psychology: a student’s handbook Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1995;

FODOR, J. A. Representations. Cambridge: Bradford Books; MIT Press, 1981;

FODOR, J. A. Psychosemantics. Cambridge: Bradford Books; MIT Press, 1987;

FODOR, J. A. A theory of content and other essays. Cambridge: Bradford Books; MIT Press, 1990;

FODOR, J. A.; PYLYSHYN, Z. W. Connectionism and cognitive rchitecture: a critical analysis. In: PINKER, S.; MEHLER, J. (Ed.). Connections and symbols. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1988. p. 3-71;

HARTSHORNE, C.; WEISS, P.; BURKS, A. (Ed.). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931-1958;

KOSSLYN, S. M. Image and mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980;

LESLIE, A. The theory of mind impairment in autism: evidence for a modular mechanism of development? In: WHITEN, A. (Ed.). Natural theories of mind. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991;

LEWIS, D. Reduction of mind. In: GUTTENPLAN, S. (Ed.). A companion to the philosophy of mind. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995. p. 412-431;

MCDOWELL, J. Mind and world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994;

MCCLELLAND, J. L.; RUMELHART, D. E.; HINTON, G. E. (Ed.). Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructures of cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1986. 2 v;

MILLIKAN, R. G. Language, thought, and other biological categories. Cambridge: MIT Press; Bradford Books, 1984;

NORMAN, D. A.; SHALLICE, T. Attention to action. In: DAVIDSON, R. J.;

SCHWARTZ, G. E.; SHAPIRO, D. (Ed.). Consciousness and self regulation. New York: Plenum Press, 1986;

PAIVIO, A. Mental representations: a dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986;

PALMER, S. E. Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In BOSCH, E.; LLOYD, B. (Ed.). Cognition and categorization. Mahwah: Erlbaum, 1978;

PUTNAM, H. The meaning of “meaning”. In: GUNDERSON, K. (Ed.).

Language, mind and knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1975. (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 7);

QUINE, W. V. Word and object. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1960;

SEARLE, J. R. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983;

SELLARS, W. Science, perception, and reality. London: Routledge; Kegan Paul, 1963;

STERELNY, K. The representational theory of mind: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990;

STICH, S. P. From folk psychology to cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983;

STRAWSON, P. F. Individuals. London: Methuen and Co., 1959;

THAGARD, P. Concepts and conceptual change. Synthese, v. 82, n. 2, p. 255-274, 1990;

VON ECKARDT, B. What is Cognitive Science? Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993.




Como Citar

Leite Bastos, C., & Drunkenmolle, T. R. (2014). Intentionality: A philosophical-cognitive approach to mental representations. Revista De Filosofia Aurora, 26(39), 819–838.