Causalidad y la Síntesis extendida: nuevos marcos conceptuales para la biología del siglo XXI

Autores

  • Maximiliano Martínez Departamento de Humanidades de la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Cuajimalpa, México DF

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7213/revistadefilosofiaaurora.7768

Resumo

En este artículo argumento que para la Síntesis extendida resulta imperioso reemplazarlos modelos causales tradicionales en biología, el de causas próximas— últimas y el de lacausalidad lineal ascendente, debido a su incapacidad para capturar la causalidad biológicacompleja que describen la mayoría de áreas de investigación en la actualidad. Estas nuevastendencias muestran la necesidad de reconceptualizar la causalidad y así permitir la construcciónde modelos multinivel que conecten bidireccionalmente diversos niveles de organizacióny diferentes escalas de tiempo. La causalidad multinivel es fundamental en losprocesos de organización natural, por lo que, argumento, la extensión de la síntesis debeubicarla en su base.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

ABRANTES, P. C.; PORTELA, F. Evolução humana: a teoria da dupla herança. In: ABRANTES, P. C. Filosofia da biologia. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2011. p. 261-295;

AMUNDSON, R. The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005;

BEATTY, J. The proximate/ultimate distinction in the multiple careers of ernst mayr. Biology and Philosophy, n. 9, p. 333-356, 1994;

ABRANTES, P. C.; PORTELA, F. Evolução humana: a teoria da dupla herança. In: ABRANTES, P. C. Filosofia da biologia. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2011. p. 261-295;

AMUNDSON, R. The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005;

BEATTY, J. The proximate/ultimate distinction in the multiple careers of Ernst Mayr. Biology and Philosophy, n. 9, p. 333-356, 1994;

BRIGANDT, I. Typology now: homology and developmental constraints ex¬plain evolvability. Biology and Philosophy, n. 22, p. 709-725, 2007;

BOYD, R.; RICHERSON, P. The origin and evolution of cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005;

CALLEBAUT, W.; MÜLLER, G.; NEWMAN, S. The organismic systems ap¬proach. In: SANSOM, R.; BRANDON, R. Integrating evolution and develop¬ment. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007. p. 25-92;

CAMPBELL, D. Downward causation in hierarchically organized biological systems. In: AYALA, F.; DOBZHANSKY, T. H. Studies in the philosophy of biology. London: MacMillan, 1974. p. 179-186;

CAPONI, G. La biología evolucionaria del desarrollo como ciencia de causas remotas. Signos filosóficos, v. 10, n. 20, p. 121-142, 2008;

EL-HANI, C.; EMMECCHE, C. On Some theoretical grounds for an organism-centered biology: property emergence, supervenience, and downward causa¬tion. Theory in Biosciences, n. 119, p. 234-275, 2000;

EL-HANI, C.; QUEIROZ, J. Downward determination, Abstracta, v. 1, n. 2, p. 162-192, 2005;

ELLIS, G. Top-down causation and the human brain, In: MURPHY, N.; ELLIS, G.; O’CONNOR, T. Downward causation and the neurobiology of free will. Berlin: Springer, 2009. p. 63-82;

EMMECHE, C.; KOPPE, S.; STJERNFELT, F. Levels, emergence, and three ver¬sions of downward causation. In: ANDERSEN, E. et al. Downward causation: minds, bodies, and matter. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 2000;

GILBERT, S.; SARKAR, S. Embracing complexity: organicism for the 21st Century. Developmental Dynamics, n. 219, p. 1-9, 2000;

HALL, B. Evo-Devo or Devo-Evo –does it matter? Evolution and Development, v. 2, n. 4, p. 177-178, 2000;

HAMBURGER, V. Embryology and the modern synthesis in evolutionary the¬ory. In: MAYR, E.; PROVINE, W. The evolutionary synthesis: perspectives on the Unification of Biology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1980. p. 97-112;

HUANG, S. The practical problems of post-genomic biology. Nature Biotechnology, n. 18, p. 471-472, 2000;

JABLONKA, E.; LAMB, M. Evolution in four dimensions. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005;

KAUFFMAN, S. The origins of order. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993;

LALAND, K.; ODLING-SMEE, J; GILBERT, S. EvoDevo and Niche-construction: building bridges. Journal of Experimental Biology, 310B, p. 1-18. 2008;

LALAND, K. et al. Cause and effect in biology revisited: is mayr’s proximate¬-ultimate dichotomy still useful? Science, n. 334, p. 1512-1516, 2011;

LAUBICHLER, M.; MAIENSCHEIN, J. Embryos, cells, and organisms: reflec¬tions on the history of evolutionary developmental biology. In: SANSOM, R.; BRANDON, R. Integrating evolution and development. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007. p. 1-24;

LEE, D.; SEVERIN, K.; GHADIRI, M. Autocatalytic networks: the transition from molecular self-replication to molecular ecosystems. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, v. 1, n. 4, p. 491-6, 1997;

MARTINEZ, M. EvoDevo, complexity and multilevel causation. In: MARTINEZ-CONTRERAS, J.; PONCE, A. Darwin’s evolving legacy. Ciudad de México: Siglo XXI, 2011. p. 144-160;

MARTINEZ, M.; MOYA, A. Selección natural, creatividad y causalidad. Teorema, v. 28, n. 2, p. 71-94, 2009;

MARTINEZ, M.; MOYA, A. Natural selection and multilevel causation. Philosophy and Theory in Biology, n. 3, p. e1-14, 2011;

MAYR, E. Cause and effect in biology. Science, v. 134, n. 3489, p.1501-1506, 1961;

MAYR, E. Reply to John Beatty. Biology and Philosophy, n. 9, p. 357-358, 1994;

MITCHELL, S. Unsimple truths. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2009;

MORENO, A.; UMEREZ, J. Downward causation at the core of living orga¬nization. In: ANDERSEN, E.; et al. Downward causation: minds, bodies, and matter. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 2000;

MÜLLER, G. Evolutionary developmental biology. In: WUKETITS, F.; AYALA, F. Handbook in evolution. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2005. p. 87-115;

MÜLLER, G. Six memos for Evo-Devo. In: LAUBICHLER, M.; MAIENSCHEIN, J. From embriology to Evo-Devo. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007a. p.459-524;

MÜLLER, G. EvoDevo: extending the evolutionary synthesis. Nature Review Genetics, n. 8, p. 943-949, 2007b;

NEWMAN, S. Hierarchy. In: HALL, B.; OLSON, W. Keywords and concepts in evolutionary developmental biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003. p.169-174;

NOBLE, D. The music of life. Biology beyond genes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006;

ODLING-SMEE, J. Niche inheritance. In: PIGLIUCCI, M.; MÜLLER, G. Evolution. The extended Synthesis. Cambridge: MIT Press. 2010. p. 175-207;

ODLING-SMEE, J.; LALAND, K.; FELDMAN, M. Niche construction: the ne¬glected process in evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003;

PIGLIUCCI, M. Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis Evolution, n. 61, p. 2743-2749, 2007;

PIGLIUCCI, M.; MÜLLER, G. Evolution. The extended synthesis. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010;

PLUTYNSKY, A. Explaining how and explaining why: developmental and evolutionary explanations of dominance. Biology and Philosophy, n. 23, p. 363-381, 2008;

RASSKIN-GUTMAN, D. Nuevos horizontes de la biología teórica. Ludus Vitalis, n. 16, p. 229-232, 2008;

RIEDL, R. A Systems theory of evolution. In: HÖSLE, V.; ILLIES, C. Darwinism and philosophy. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005. p. 121-142;

SEPKOSKI, D. Macroevolution. In: RUSE, M. Oxford handbook of philoso¬phy of biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. p. 211-237;

SOTO, A.; SONNENSCHEIN, C. Emergentism as a default: cancer as a pro¬blem of tissue organization. Journal of Biosciences, v. 30, n. 1, p. 103-118, 2005;

STROHMAN, R. Organization becomes cause in the matter. Nature Biotechnology n.18, p. 575-576, 2000;

THIERRY, B. Integrating proximate and ultimate causation: just one more go! Current Science, v. 89, n. 7 p. 1180-1184, 2005;

TREWAVAS, A. A brief history of systems biology. Plant Cell, v. 18, n. 10, p. 2420-2430, 2006;

VRBA, E.; ELDREDGE, N. Individuals, hierarchies and processes: towards a more complete evolutionary theory. Paleobiology, v. 10, n. 2, p. 146-171, 1984;

WAGNER, A. Causality in complex systems. Biology and Philosophy, n. 14, p. 83-101, 1999;

WIMSATT, W. Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007.

Downloads

Publicado

2013-05-03

Como Citar

Martínez, M. (2013). Causalidad y la Síntesis extendida: nuevos marcos conceptuales para la biología del siglo XXI. Revista De Filosofia Aurora, 25(36), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.7213/revistadefilosofiaaurora.7768