The Notion of Power in Hans Jonas’ Das Prinzip Verantwortung (The Imperative of Responsibility)




Hans Jonas. Power. Technology. Ethics of Responsibility. Philosophy of Technology.


The questions concerning control over the environment are becoming increasingly more significant. From ecology to medicine, from bioethics to transhumanism, there are many different issues reflected and acted upon, which have an important common element, namely underlying premises about the relationship between the natural biosphere and humans. Hans Jonas, in his book The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search for an Ethics for the Technological Age, first published over 40 years ago in German as Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation, proposed philosophical and ethical foundations for understanding this relationship. One of the underestimated Hans Jonas’ reflections concerns the characteristic of power. The paper analyzes the concept of power presented along with the imperative of responsibility, as well as three different degrees of power characteristic for Jonas’ approach to the notion of power. The paper presents this structure of power and the underlying philosophical considerations that constitute a basis for it. It also provides an argument that these considerations may be used as a framework for understanding many contemporary challenges and ethical responsibility in the technological age.


Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Piotr Rosół, The Maria Grzegorzewska University in Warsaw

Main interests: ethics of science and technology, social ethics.


BÖHLER, D., Zukunftsverantwortung in Globaler Perspektive. Zur Aktualität von Hans Jonas und der Diskursethik, Bad Homburg: VAS, 2009.

DONNELLEY, S., Whitehead and Jonas: on biological organisms and real individuals. In: Organism, Medicine and Metaphysics. Essays in Honor of Hans Jonas on his 75-th Birthday, ed. by S. F. Spicker, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company 1978.

ELLUL, J., Technological society. Toronto: Vintage Book, 1964.

FEENBERG, A., Technosystem. The Social Life of Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2017.

GIOVANNI, M., Essays in medical ethics. Plea for a Medicine of Prudence, Stuttgart: Thieme 2017.

GORDON, J.-S., BURCKHART, H., SEGLER, P., Introduction. In: Global Ethics and Moral Responsibility. Hans Jonas and his Critics, ed. by GORDON, J.-S., BURCKHART, H., New York: Routledge 2016.

HOŁUB, G., Is Transhumanism a New Face of Bioethics?, Rev. Filos., Aurora, Curitiba, v. 32, n. 55, pp. 62-73, jan./abr. 2020.

JONAS, H., Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1979.

JONAS, H., Organism and Freedom. An Essay in Philosophical Biology. ed. J. Becker, F. Preußger, Siegen 2016. Available online:

JONAS, H., Responsibility Today: The Ethics of an Endangered Future, Social Research, Vol. 43, No. 1, (SPRING 1976), pp. 77-97.

JONAS, H., The Imperative of Responsibility. In Search for an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1984.

JUCHNIEWICZ, N., Dialectical Technology – Hegel on Means, Tools and the Machine, FILOZOFIA 73, 2018, No. 10, pp. 818 – 830. Available online:

KELLY, K., What technology wants? New York: Viking, 2010.

LATOUR, B., Facing Gaia. Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime, trans. C. Porter, Cambridge: Polity 2017/

LEVY, D., Hans Jonas: The Integrity of Thinking, Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2002.

NIETZSCHE, F., The Gay Science, trans. W. Kaufmann, New York: Vintage Books 1974.

PASQUALE, F., The Black Box Society. The Secret Algorithms that Control Money and Information, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press 2015.

PEDACE, K., BALMACEDA T., LAWLER D., PEREZ, D., ZELLER, M., Natural Born Transhumans, Rev. Filos., Aurora, Curitiba, v. 32, n. 55, p. 112-131, jan./abr. 2020.

Prinzip Zukunft. Im Dialog mit Hans Jonas, ed. SEIDEL, R., ENDRUWEIT M., Borchen: Mentis 2007.

REES, M., Our Final Hour. A Scientist’s Warning: How Terror, Error, and Environmental Disaster Threaten Humankind’s Future in This Century— On Earth and Beyond, New York: Basic Books, 2003.

TENNER, E. Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences. Vintage 1997.

The Economist, May 9-th 2020, Where nature ends. Carbon cycles, p. 47, 48.

ULRICH, B., Wo sind die Grünen, wenn man sie mal braucht?, Die Zeit 31.05.2020.

VERBEEK, P., Moralizing Technology. Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 2011.

VOGEL, L., The Responsibility Of Thinking In Dark Times: Hannah Arendt Versus Hans Jonas, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 29.1 (2008): 253-293. Web.

WOLIN, R., Heidegger’s Children: Hannah Arendt, Karl Löwith, Hans Jonas, and Herbert Marcuse, Princeton: Princeton University Press 2015.




Como Citar

Rosół, P. (2020). The Notion of Power in Hans Jonas’ Das Prinzip Verantwortung (The Imperative of Responsibility). Revista De Filosofia Aurora, 32(57).