I like you, do you like me? How gender, context, and aggression predict liking.

Authors

  • Michaela Marian University of Nebraska
  • Josafá Moreira da Cunha UFPR
  • Jonathan B. Santo University of Nebraska

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7213/psicolargum.36.93.AO07

Keywords:

agressão, escola, gender

Abstract

Prosocial behaviors are correlated with positive relationships and acceptance by peers while aggression is correlated with negative relationships and rejection by peers. Peer aggression is also negatively correlated with peer liking, though the relationship may differ based on gender and norms. The current study examines the relationship between the different forms of aggression (physical, verbal, relational) and peer liking. The study asked 148 students from five classrooms in Curitiba, Brazil to complete peer nominations of their classmates and nominate students who were aggressive as well as rate how much they liked each peer. Multilevel modeling was used to analyze the data. Overall, girls were better liked than boys, and girls tended to like boys less than boys liked girls. Physical, verbal, and relational aggression all improved the overall model, and are important to understanding the full picture. Boys who were high in relational aggression liked other relationally aggressive boys less and girls who were less relationally aggressive liked more relationally aggressive girls less. Children high in physical aggression like physically aggressive peers more and this relationship was stronger for girls. In classrooms high in overall physical aggression, however, physically aggressive girls liked their physically aggressive peers less, indicating that context plays a key role. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bass, E. C., Saldarriaga, L., Cunha, J., Chen, B. B., Santo, J. B., & Bukowski, W. M. (2016). A

cross-cultural analysis of the relations of physical and relational aggression with peer victimization. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 0165025416677846.

Berg, Y. H., Lansu, T. A., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2015) Measuring social status and social

behavior with peer and teacher nomination methods. Social Development, 24, 815-832. doi:10.1111/sode.12120

Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J. and Kaukiainen, A. (1992), Do girls manipulate and boys

fight? developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggr. Behav., 18: 117–127. doi:10.1002/1098-2337(1992)18:2<117::AID-AB2480180205>3.0.CO;2-3

Boor-Klip, H. J., Segers, E., Hendrickx, M., Cillessen, A. H. N. (2017). The moderating role of

classroom descriptive norms in the association of student behavior with social preference and popularity. Journal of Early Adolescence, 37, 387-413. doi:0272-4316

Boulton, M. J., Trueman, M., & Murray, L. (2008). Associations between peer victimization,

fear of future victimization, and disrupted concentration on class work among junior s chool pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 473-489. D oi:10.1348/000709908X320471

Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data

analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Bukowski, W. M., & Newcomb, A. F. (1984). Stability and determinants of sociometric

status and friendship choice: A longitudinal perspective. Developmental Psychology,

(5), 941-952

Chen, X., He, Y., Oliveira, A. M. D., Coco, A. L., Zappulla, C., Kaspar, V., ... & DeSouza, A.

(2004). Loneliness and social adaptation in Brazilian, Canadian, Chinese and Italian children: a multi‐national comparative study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(8), 1373-1384.

Chen, X., Zappulla, C., Lo Coco, A., Schneider, B., Kaspar, V., De Oliveira, A. M., ... & Chi-

Hang Tse, H. (2004). Self-perceptions of competence in Brazilian, Canadian, Chinese and Italian children: Relations with social and school adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(2), 129-138.

Clark, K. E., & Ladd, G. W. (2000). Connectedness and autonomy support in parent-child

relationships: Links to children's socioemotional orientation and peer relationships. Developmental Psychology, 36(4), 485-498.

Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A

cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557-570.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557

Coie, J. D., Lochman, J. E., Terry, R., & Hyman, C. (1992). Predicting early adolescent

disorder from childhood aggression and peer rejection. Journal of Consulting and

Clinical Psychology, 60, 783-792.

Crick NR, Ostrov JM, Burr JE, Cullerton-Sen C, Jansen-Yeh E, Ralston P. A longitudinal study

of relational and physical aggression in preschool. Applied Developmental Psychology. 2006;27:254–268

Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., & Brakke, N. P. (1982). Behaviour patterns of socially rejected

and neglected preadolescents: The roles of social approach and aggression. Journal

of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10(3), 389-409.

Donoghue, C., & Raia-Hawrylak, A. (2016). Moving beyond the emphasis on bullying: A

generalized approach to peer aggression in high school. Children and Schools. 38, 30-39. doi:10.1093/cs/cdv042.

Drury, K., Bukowski, W. M., Velásquez, A. M., & Stella-Lopez, L. (2013). Victimization and

gender identity in single-sex and mixed-sex schools: Examining contextual variations in pressure to conform to gender norms. Sex Roles, 69(7-8), 442-454.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0118-6

Ettekal, I., & Ladd, G. W. (2015). Developmental pathways from childhood aggression–

disruptiveness, chronic peer rejection, and deviant friendships to early-adolescent rule breaking. Child Development. 86, 614-631. doi:10.1111/cdev.12321.

Ettekal, I., & Ladd, G. W. (2017). Developmental continuity and change in physical, verbal, and

relational aggression and peer victimization from childhood to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 53, 1709-1721. doi:10.1037/dev0000357

Fite, P., Preddy, T., Vitulano, M., Elkins, S., Grassetti, S. and Wimsatt, A. (2012), Perceived best

friend delinquency moderates the link between contextual risk factors and juvenile delinquency. J. Community Psychol., 40: 747–761. doi:10.1002/jcop.21495

Goodman, E., Adler, N. E., Kawachi, I., Frazier, A. L., Huang, B., & Colditz, G. A. (2001).

Adolescents' perceptions of social status: development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics, 108(2), e31-e31.

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based

behavioral science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 111-135.

Hopmeyer Gorman, A., Schwartz, D., Nakamoto, J., Mayeux, L, (2011). Unpopularity and

disliking among peers: partially distinct dimensions of adolescents' social experiences.

Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, p208-217

Isaacs, J., Voeten, M. and Salmivalli, C. (2013), Gender-specific or Common Classroom Norms?

Examining the Contextual Moderators of the Risk for Victimization. Social Development, 22: 555–579. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2012.00655.x

Lagirspetz K. M. J., Bjorkqvist K., Peltonen T. (1988). Is indirect aggression typical of females?

Aggressive Behavior 14:403414.

Lansford, J. E., Peña Alampay, L., Al-Hassan,S., et al., (2010). Corporal Punishment

of Children in Nine Countries as a Function of Child Gender and Parent Gender, International Journal of Pediatrics, doi:10.1155/2010/672780

Lynch, R. J., Kistner, J. A., Stephens, H. F. and David-Ferdon, C. (2016), Positively biased self-

perceptions of peer acceptance and subtypes of aggression in children. Aggr. Behav., 42: 82–96. doi:10.1002/ab.21611

Masten, A. S., Morison, P., & Pellegrini, D. S. (1985). Peer reputation in middle

childhood as a predictor of adaptation in adolescence: A seven-year follow-up. Child

Development, 62, 991-1007.

Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Laursen, B. (2009). Handbook of peer interactions,

relationships, and groups. New York, NY: Guilford.

Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and

groups. Handbook of child psychology.

Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and

groups. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg, (Eds.), Handbook of child

psychology: Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development. (pp. 17-34)New York: Wiley.

Santo, J. B., Bass, E. C., Stella-Lopez, L., & Bukowski, W. M. (2017). Contextual influences on

the relations between physical and relational aggression and peer victimization.

School Psychology International, 38, 42-59. doi:10.1177/0143034316678655.

Spieker, S. J., Oxford, M. L., Kelly, J. F., Nelson, E. M., & Fleming, C. B. (2012). Promoting

First Relationships: Randomized Trial of a Relationship-Based Intervention for Toddlers in Child Welfare. Child Maltreatment, 17(4), 271–286. http://doi.org/10.1177/1077559512458176

Tenney, E. R., Turkheimer, E., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2009). Being Liked is More than Having a

Good Personality: The Role of Matching. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(4), 579–585. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.03.004

Wang, J., Iannotti, R. J., & Luk, J. W. (2011). Peer victimization and academic adjustment

among early adolescents: Moderation by gender and perceived classmate support. Journal of School Health, 81, 386-392. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00606.x.

Weijun, W., Vaillancourt, T., Brittain, H. L., Krygsman, A., Smith, D., Haltigan, J., … Hymel, S.

(2014). School climate, peer victimization, and academic achievement: results from a multi-informant study. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 360-377. doi:10.1037/spq0000084

Downloads

Published

2019-11-22

How to Cite

Marian, M., Cunha, J. M. da, & Santo, J. B. (2019). I like you, do you like me? How gender, context, and aggression predict liking. Psicologia Argumento, 36(93), 383–407. https://doi.org/10.7213/psicolargum.36.93.AO07

Issue

Section

Articles