Spiritual learning communities: historical, systematic and practical observations1

Authors

  • Bert Roebben PhD, professor of Religious Education at the Fakultät Humanwissenschaften und Theologie, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund - Germany,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7213/revistapistispraxis.06.002.ds05

Keywords:

Learning by conversation. Learning in difference. Interreligious learning. Teacher education.

Abstract

Children and young people have the inalienable right to be part of a learning community. Nobody can learn on his/her own. Education is always a communal enterprise. In this paper the concept of the ‘spiritual learning community’ is developed as a contemporary answer to the socio-educational issues raised by Martin Buber and John Dewey in the 1930s. Cultural and religious diversity today stimulate education and schooling more than ever before to reconsider the narrative-communicative and spiritual dimension of every learning process. The spiritual dimension of the learning community relates to a specific
habitus, namely of de-centration from the self and dedication to the other, and to a specific focus, namely on existential questions such as content of the learning process. Insights
from philosophy of education and from European religious education theory and concrete experiences of teacher education at the universities of Dortmund (Germany) and Wien
(Austria) form the horizon for this reflection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AFDAL, G. Researching religious education as social practice. Münster:

Waxmann, 2010.

ASTLEY, J. A theological reflection on the nature of religious truth. In: ASTLEY,

J. et al. (Ed.). Teaching religion, teaching truth: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Oxford: Peter Lang, 2012. p. 241-262.

BAART, A.; VOSMAN, F. Een lerende gemeenschap ‘ethiek’ van geestelijk verzorgers [A learning community of ethics for pastoral caregivers]. Tijdschrift voor

Geestelijke Verzorging, v. 9, n. 41, p. 38-50, 2006.

BIESTA, G. Philosophy, exposure, and children: how to resist the instrumentalisation of philosophy in education? Journal of Philosophy of Education, v. 45, n. 2, p. 305-319, 2011.

BORGMAN, E. The ‘New’ Europe: a spiritual gesture. Concilium, n. 2, p. 33-41, 2004.

BOYS, M. C. Learning in the presence of the other. Religious Education, v. 103,

n. 5, p. 502-506, 2008.

BUBER, M. Education and worldview. In: BUBER, M. Pointing the way: collected essays. New York: Harper, 1957. p. 98-105.

BUBER, M. Autobiographical fragments. In: SCHILPP, P. A.; FRIEDMAN, M. (Ed.). The philosophy of Martin Buber. London: Cambridge University Press, 1967. p. 3-39.

BÜTTNER, G. How theologizing with children can work. British Journal of Religious Education, v. 29, n. 2, p. 127-139, 2007.

DEWEY, J. A common faith. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1934.

DUMESTRE, M. J. Postfundamentalism and the christian intentional learning community. Religious Education, v. 90, n. 2, p. 190-206, 1995.

FABER, W. Das dialogische Prinzip Martin Bubers und das erzieherische Verhältnis [The dialogical principal of Martin Buber and the educational relationship]. Ratingen: Henn, 1962.

GEARON, L. 2006. The teaching of human rights in religious education: the case of genocide. In: BATES, D.; DURKA, G.; SCHWEITZER, F. (Ed.). Education, religion and society: essays in honour of John M. Hull. London; New York: Routledge, 2006. p. 71-82.

GEURTS, T. Losmaken en trekkracht: de spiritualiteit van ongebonden spiritualiteit – Ontmoeting met Kees Waaijman [Unfastening and the power to drag: the spirituality of unrestrained spirituality – interview with Kees Waaijman]. Narthex: Tijdschrift voor Levensbeschouwing en Educatie, v. 12, n. 4, p. 21-26, 2012.

GHILONI, A. J. Interreligious education: what would Dewey do? Religious Education, v. 106, n. 5, p. 476-493, 2011. GRÜMME, B. Alteritätstheoretische religionsdidaktik [Religious education

based on alterity theory]. In: GRÜMME, B.; LENHARD, H.; PIRNER, M. (Ed.).

Religionsunterricht neu denken: innovative ansätze und perspektiven der religionsdidaktik. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2012. p. 119-132.

IPGRAVE, J. ‘My God and other people’s Gods’: children’s theology in a contexto of plurality. In: IVERSEN, G. Y. de; MITCHELL, G.; POLLARD, G. Hovering over the Face of the Deep: philosophy, theology and children. Münster: Waxmann, 2009. p. 53-69.

JACKSON, R. Rethinking religious education and plurality: issues in diversity and pedagogy. London; New York: Routledge, 2004.

JÄGGLE, M. Religiöse pluralität als herausforderung für schulentwicklung [Religious plurality as a challenge for school development]. In: JÄGGLE, M.; KROBATH, T.; SCHELANDER, R. (Ed.). Lebens. werte. Schule: religiöse dimensionen in schulkultur und schulentwicklung. Berlin: Lit-Verlag, 2009.

p. 265-280.

JOAS, H. Braucht der mensch religion? Über erfahrungen der selbsttranszendenz [Does the human being needs religion? On experiences of self-transcendence]. Freiburg; Basel; Wien: Herder, 2004.

KOZYREV, F. The roles of dialogue in religious education: a Russian perspective. In: BATES, D.; DURKA, G.; SCHWEITZER, F. (Ed.). Education, religion and society: essays in honour of John M. Hull. London; New York: Routledge, 2006.

p. 215-227. KUNDERA, M. Die Weltliteratur: how we read one another. The New Yorker, January 8, 2007. Available at: <http://legacy.newyorker.com/ reporting/2007/01/08/070108fa_fact_kundera>. Available at: 2014, Aug. 13th. LANSER-VAN DER VELDE, A.; MIEDEMA, S. Het gewone geloof van gewone mensen: de godsdienstfilosofische visie van John Dewey [The ordinary faith of ordinary people: philosophy of religion according to Dewey]. In: LOGISTER, L. (Ed.). John Dewey: een inleiding tot zijn filosofie. Damon: Budel, 2005. p. 35- 53.

LOMBAERTS, H. The impact of the status of religion in contemporary Society upon interreligious learning. In: POLLEFEYT, D. Interreligious learning. Leuven; Paris; Dudley: Peeters, 2007. p. 55-86.

MASSCHELEIN, J.; SIMONS, M. Globale immuniteit: een kleine cartografie van de Europese ruimte voor onderwijs [Global immunity: a small cartography of the European space for education]. Leuven: Acco, 2003.

MEYER, H. Was ist guter Unterricht? [What is good instruction?]. Berlin: Cornelsen, 2009.

MOULIN, D. Giving voice to ‘the silent minority’: the experiences of religious students in secondary school religious education lessons. British Journal of Religious Education, v. 33, n. 3, p. 313-326, 2011.

MOYAERT, M. Leven in Babelse tijden: de noodzaak van een interreligieuze dialoog [Living in a Babel era: the necessity of the interreligious dialogue]. Kalmthout: Uitgeverij Pelckmans, 2011.

MUTH, A.-K.; SAJAK, C. P. Der gast als gabe? Religionspädagogische überlegungen zur frage der konfessionellen gastfreundschaft im religionsunterricht [The guest as a gift? Religious educational reflections on the question of confessional hospitality in religious education]. In: SCHMID, H.; VERBURG, W. Gastfreundschaft: ein modell für den konfessionellen religionsunterricht der zukunft. München: DKV, 2010. p. 22-33.

NIEUW WIJ: website. Available at: . Accessed in: 2013, May 28th.

PANIKKAR, R. The Window. [2010]. Video. Available at: <http://www.youtube. com/watch?v=Kvsov6OuTWs>. Accessed in: 2013, Mar. 18th. RELIGIONSMONITOR: website. Available at: . Accessed in: 2013, May 28th.

RICOEUR, P. Parcours de la reconnaissance: trois études [Parcours of recognition: three studies]. Paris: Éditions Stock, 2004.

ROEBBEN, B. Seeking sense in the city: european perspectives on religious education. Berlin: Berlin : LIT, 2009.

ROEBBEN, B. Scholen voor het leven: kleine didactiek van de hoop in zeven stappen [Schools for life: small didactics of hope in seven steps]. Leuven:

Acco, 2011.

ROEBBEN, B. Das Abenteuer “mensch-werden” [The adventure of becoming a “human being”]. Katechetische Blätter, v. 137, n. 4, p. 241-247, 2012a.

ROEBBEN, B. 2012b. Living and learning in the presence of the other: defining religious education inclusively. International Journal of Inclusive Education, v. 16, n. 11, p. 1175-1187, 2012b.

ROTH, J. Job, the story of a simple man. Woodstock: Overlook Press, 2002.

Original in German, 1930.

SCHLAG, T.; SCHWEITZER, F. Brauchen jugendliche theologie? Jugendtheologie als herausforderung und didaktische perspektive [Do Young people need a juvenile theology? Youth theology as challenge and didactical perspective]. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlagsgesellschaft, 2011.

SCHNEIDERS, S. Religion vs. spirituality: a contemporary conundrum. Spiritus: A Journal of Christian Spirituality, v. 3, n. 2, p. 163-185, 2003. SIMONS, M.; MASSCHELEIN, J. The public and its university: beyond learning for civic employability? European Educational Research Journal, v. 8, n. 2, p. 204-217, 2009.

TER AVEST, I. 2009. Conflict matters: ‘the making of’ a difference. In: TER AVEST, I. (Ed.). Education in conflict. Münster: Waxmann, 2009. p. 15-37. VON STOSCH, K. Komparative theologie als wegweiser in der welt der religionen [Comparative theology as a signpost in the world of religions]. Paderborn: Schöningh, 2012.

ZONDERVAN, T. Jongeren als verhaal van God [Young people as the story of God]. In: ZONDERVAN, T. (Ed.). Bricolage en bezieling: over jongeren, cultuur en religie. Averbode: Altiora, 2008. p. 147-172.

Downloads

Published

2014-09-13

How to Cite

Roebben, B. (2014). Spiritual learning communities: historical, systematic and practical observations1. Pistis Praxis, 6(2), 473–495. https://doi.org/10.7213/revistapistispraxis.06.002.ds05

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2014): Ensino Religioso

Section

Dossier

License

O(s) autor(es) transfere(m), por meio de cessão, à EDITORA UNIVERSITÁRIA CHAMPAGNAT, pessoa jurídica de direito privado, inscrita no CNPJ/MF sob o n.º 76.659.820/0009-09, estabelecida na Rua Imaculada Conceição, n.º 1155, Prado Velho, CEP 80.215-901, na cidade de Curitiba/PR, os direitos abaixo especificados e se compromete a cumprir o que segue:

 

  1. Os autores afirmam que a obra/material é de sua autoria e assumem integral responsabilidade diante de terceiros, quer de natureza moral ou patrimonial, em razão de seu conteúdo, declarando, desde já, que a obra/material a ser entregue é original e não infringe quaisquer direitos de propriedade intelectual de terceiros.
  2. Os autores concordam em ceder de forma plena, total e definitiva os direitos patrimoniais da obra/material à EDITORA UNIVERSITÁRIA CHAMPAGNAT, a título gratuito e em caráter de exclusividade.
  3. A CESSIONÁRIA empregará a obra/material da forma como melhor lhe convier, de forma impressa e/ou on line, inclusive no site do periódico da EDITORA UNIVERSITÁRIA CHAMPAGNAT, podendo utilizar, fruir e dispor do mesmo, no todo ou em parte, para:
  • Autorizar sua utilização por terceiros, como parte integrante de outras obras.
  • Editar, gravar e imprimir, quantas vezes forem necessárias.
  • Reproduzir em quantidades que julgar necessária, de forma tangível e intangível.
  • Adaptar, modificar, condensar, resumir, reduzir, compilar, ampliar, alterar, mixar com outros conteúdos, incluir imagens, gráficos, objetos digitais, infográficos e hyperlinks, ilustrar, diagramar, fracionar, atualizar e realizar quaisquer outras transformações, sendo necessária a participação ou autorização expressa dos autores.
  • Traduzir para qualquer idioma.
  • Incluir em fonograma ou produção audiovisual.
  • Distribuir.
  • Distribuir mediante cabo, fibra ótica, satélite, ondas ou qualquer outro sistema que permite ao usuário realizar a seleção da obra ou produção para recebê-la em tempo e lugar previamente determinados por quem formula a demanda e nos casos em que o acesso às obras ou produções se faça por qualquer sistema que importe em pagamento pelo usuário.
  • Incluir e armazenar em banco de dados, físico, digital ou virtual, inclusive nuvem.
  • Comunicar direta e/ou indiretamente ao público.
  • Incluir em base de dados, arquivar em formato impresso, armazenar em computador, inclusive em sistema de nuvem, microfilmar e as demais formas de arquivamento do gênero;
  • Comercializar, divulgar, veicular, publicar etc.
  • Quaisquer outras modalidades de utilização existentes ou que venham a ser inventadas. 
  1. Os autores concordam em conceder a cessão dos direitos da primeira publicação (ineditismo) à revista, licenciada sob a CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION LICENSE, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria.
  2. Os autores autorizam a reprodução e a citação de seu trabalho em repositórios institucionais, página pessoal, trabalhos científicos, dentre outros, desde que a fonte seja citada.
  3. A presente cessão é válida para todo o território nacional e para o exterior.
  4. Este termo entra em vigor na data de sua assinatura e é firmado pelas partes em caráter irrevogável e irretratável, obrigando definitivamente as partes e seus sucessores a qualquer título.
  5. O não aceite do artigo, pela EDITORA UNIVERSITÁRIA CHAMPAGNAT, tornará automaticamente sem efeito a presente declaração.