Estratégia como mediadora da relação entre uso de S.I. e desempenho empresarial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7213/rebrae.07.002.AO07Palavras-chave:
Desempenho empresarial, Estratégia, Uso de SI, Tecnologia de informação.Resumo
Com as mudanças mercadológicas dos últimos anos, as organizações têm buscado alternativas estratégicas diversificadas, muitas delas apoiadas pelo uso de sistemas computacionais. Este artigo tem como objetivo avaliar a influência da estratégia e do uso de sistemas de informação (S.I.) sobre o desempenho empresarial. Foram utilizados fatores multidimensionais em modelagem de equações estruturais. A técnica Partial Least Squares (PLS) foi aplicada com dados de 108 indústrias brasileiras. Os resultados indicam alta influência da estratégia sobre o desempenho empresarial, assim como de uso de SI sobre estratégia. Entretanto, apesar de significante, a relação direta entre uso de SI e desempenho demonstrou-se fraca. E o efeito total de uso de SI sobre desempenho, tendo estratégia como variável mediadora, apresentou-se altamente significante. O modelo explicou 55% da variabilidade de desempenho empresarial e confirma que o uso de SI, por si só, não garante um bom desempenho empresarial, devendo este ser orientado por estratégias corporativas que garantam alinhamento entre as ações da empresa e os interesses dos stakeholders.Downloads
Referências
ATKINSON et al. Management Accounting: Information for Decision-Making and Strategy
Execution. Prentice Hall; 6 ed. 2011.
ALBERTIN, A. L.; ALBERTIN, R. M. M. Dimensões do uso de tecnologia da informação: um instrumento de diagnóstico e análise. Rev. Adm. Pública, v. 46, n. 1, p. 125-151, 2012.
ALBERTIN, A. L.; ALBERTIN, R. M. M. Benefícios do uso de tecnologia de informação para o
desempenho empresarial. Revista de Administração Pública [Impresso], v. 42, p. 275-302,
ANDERSON, M. C. et al. Value implications of investments in information technology. Management Sci. 52(9) 1359-1376, 2006.
ANSOFF, H. I.; MCDONNELL, E., J. Implanting Strategic Management. Prentice-Hall International. UK, 1984.
BARBIERI, J. C. Organizações inovadoras sustentáveis. In: BARBIERI, J. C; SIMANTOB, M. Organizações inovadoras sustentáveis: uma reflexão sobre o futuro das organizações. São
Paulo, Atlas, 2007.
BARBIERI, J. C., et al. Inovação e sustentabilidade: Novos modelos e proposições. RAE, São
Paulo, v. 50, n. 2, abr./jun., 2010.
BARNEY, J. B. Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Upper Saddle River: Prentice
Hall, 2002.
CHAN, Y.; HUFF S. Strategic Information Systems Alignment. Business Quarterly, v. 58, n.1, p.
-56. 1993.
CHAN, Y. E. et al. G. Business Strategic Orientation, Information System Strategic Orientation,
and Strategic Alignment. Information Systems Research, v. 8, n. 2, p. 125-150, Jun, 1997.
CHAKRAVARTHY, B. S. Measuring Strategic Performance. Strategic Management Journal, v.
-5; ABI/INFORM Global, 1986.
CHARI, M. D. R.; DEVARAJ, S.; DAVID, P. IT and firm performance: Moderating effects of product diversification. Management Science, 54: 224-234. 2008.
CHIN, W. W.; NEWSTED, P. R. Structural equation modeling analysis with small Sample using
partial least squares. In: HOYLE, R. H. (Ed.). Statistical strategies for small sample research.
Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. p. 307-341, 1999.
COLLINS, J.; PORRAS, J. I. Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies. Harper
Business: 1 ed. 2004.
COOL, K;. SCHENDEL, D. Performance Differences Among Strategic Group Members. Strategic
Management Journal, v. 9, n. 3, p. 207 -233, 1988.
COPELAND, T.; KOLLER, T.; MURRIN, J. Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of
Companies, 3rd Edition Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 3 edition, July 28, 2000.
DAVIS, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information
technology. MIS Quarterly, v. 13, n. 3, 319-339, 1989.
DELONE, W. H.; MCLEAN, E. R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent
variable. Information Systems Research, v. 3, n. 1, p. 60–86, 1992.
DELONE, W. H.; MCLEAN, E. R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success:
A ten year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 19, n. 4, p. 9–30, 2003.
DEVARAJ, S., KOHLI, R. Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the
Missing Link? Management Science, v. 49, n. 3, March, 2003.
DRUCKER, P. Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. Harper Business, 1993.
DRUCKER, P. The Practice of Management. Harper Business. Reissue edition, USA. Oct, 2006.
ELKINGTON, J. Canibais com garfo e faca. São Paulo: Makron Books, 2001.
GHEMAWAT, P. Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, v. 76, n. 1, p. 37-74, 2002.
FORNELL, C.; LARCKER, D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, v. 18, p. 39-50, feb. 1981.
HALL, G., R. J.; et al. How to Make Reengineering Work. Harvard Business Review, 71:6, p.
- 131, Nov-Dec, 1993.
HAMEL, Gary. PRAHALAD, C.K. Competing for the Future. Harvard Business Review Press;
First Edition USA. 1996.
HAIR, JR. J. F. et al. Análise Multivariada de dados. 6. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2009.
HAX, A. C.; MAJLUF, N. S. Strategy Concept and Process: A Pragmatic Approach. 2 ed. Prentice Hall, 1995.
KALIKA, M.; KEFI, H.; SCHWARZ, A. Dynamic Capabilities Approach to Understanding the
Impact of IT-Enabled Businesses Processes and IT-Business alignment on the Strategic and
Operational Performance of the Firm. Communications of Association for Information
System, v. 26, Article 4, p. 57-84, March 2010.
KAO, J. Innovation Nation: How America Is Losing Its Innovation Edge, Why It Matters, and
What We Can Do to Get It Back, Publisher: Free Press; 1 edition October 2, 2007.
KAPLAN, R. S.; NORTON, D. P. The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, USA, 1996.
KAPLAN, R. S.; NORTON, D. P. Strategy Maps. Harvard Business School Press. 1 ed. USA. 2004.
KAPLAN, R. S.; NORTON, D. P. The Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations for
Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business School Press. 1 ed. 2008.
KEMP, R; PEARSON, P. (Eds) Final report of the project Measuring Eco- Innovation. Maastricht (The Netherlands), 2008.
KOHLI, R.; DEVARAJ, S. Measuring information technology payoff: a meta-analysis of structural
variables in firm-level empirical research. Information systems research, v.14, n.2, p.127,
LOBATO, et. Al. Estratégia de Empresas. 9ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora: FGV, 2009.
LOHMÖLLER, J. Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Heidelberger:
Physica-Verlag, 1989.
LORANGE, P.; ROOS, J. Strategic Alliances: Formation, Implementation and Evolution. Wiley,
LUFTMAN, J. N.; LEWIS, P. R.; OLDACH, S. H. Transforming the enterprise: the alignment of
business and information technology strategies. IBM System Journal, v. 32, n. 1, p. 198-220,
LUFTMAN, J., MCLEAN, E. Key Issues for IT Executives, MIS Quarterly Executive (3)2, p. 89–
, 2004.
LUFTMAN, J. et al. Managing the information technology resource: leadership in information age. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004.
MACGEE, J. V.; PRUSAK, L. Gerenciamento estratégico da informação: aumente a competitividade de sua empresa utilizando a informação como ferramenta estratégica. Rio de Janeiro:
Campus, 1994.
MAHMOOD, M. A.: Associating organizational strategic performance with information technology investment: an exploratory research. European Journal of Information Systems, v. 2, n.
, p. 185-200, 1993.
MARÔCO, J. Análise de Equações Estruturais: Fundamentos teóricos, software e aplicações.
Report Number: Pêro Pinheiro, 2010.
MASI, D. O ócio criativo. Rio de Janeiro: Sextante. 2000. 328.
MEIRELLES, F. Pesquisa: Administração de Recursos de TI – Tecnologia de Informação. Centro de Tecnologia de Informação Aplicada da EAESP - GVCia, São Paulo, 2012.
MELVILLE, N.; KRAEMER, K.; GURBAXANI, V. Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value. MIS Quarterly, v. 28-2, 2004.
MINTZBERG, H. Five Ps for Strategy The Strategy Process Concepts, Contexts and Cases.
New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1998.
MOTOHASHI, K. Innovation strategy and business performance of Japanese manufacturing
firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, v. 7, n. 1, p. 27-52, 1998.
MURPHY, T. Achieving business value from technology: a practical guide for today’s executive. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
NEELY, A.; GREGORY, M. PLATTS, K. Performance measurement system design - A literature
review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 25-12, 2005.
OHMAE, K. The global logic of strategic alliances. Harvard Business Review, march apriI. n.
, p. 143-163, 1989.
PETTER, S; DELONE, W; McLEAN, E. Measuring information systems success: Models, Dimensions, measures and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, v. 17, p.
-263, 2008.
PETTER , S. MCLEAN, E. R. A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success
model: An examination of IS success at the individual level. Information & Management, 46,
–166, 2009.
PORTER, M. E.; MILLAR, V. E. How Information Gives you Competitive Advantage. Harvard
Business Review, Boston. v. 1. 63, Iss. 4; p. 149, 1985.
PORTER, M. E. Competitive Advantage. Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Macmilian, New York, 1985.
PORTER, M. What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, Nov-Dec, pp. 61-78. USA, 1996.
PORTER, M. E. A competitividade também é social. HSM Management, n. 78, janeiro/fevereiro, p. 19-26, 2010.
PORTER, M. E. From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Business. Review, 65(3) 43-59, 1987.
POWELL, T. C,. DENT-MICALLEF, A. Information technology as competitive advantage: The
role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management J, 18(5) 375-405,
QUIGLEY, J. V. Vision: how leaders develop it, share it and sustain it. Publisher: Mcgraw-Hill; 1
ed. USA. 1995.
RAI, A.; LANG, S. S.; WELKER, R. B. Assessing the Validity of Is Success Models: An Empirical
Test and Theoretical Analysis. Information Systems Research, v. 13, n. 1, 2002.
RINGLE, C.M.; WENDE, S.; WILL, A. SmartPLS 2.0 M3. Germany: University of Hamburg, 2005.
Disponível em: <http://www.smartpls.de>. Acesso em: 16/03/2013.
SHANNON, C. E.; WEAVER, W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of
Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, 1949.
TEECE, D. J. Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. Econom. Behav. Organ.,
(1) 39-63, 1982.
VENKATESH, V.; et al. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS
Quarterly, v. 27, n. 3, 2003.
VENKATRAMAN, N. IT-induced Business Reconfiguration. In MORTON, M. S. S. (org.), The
Corporations of the 1990s: Information Technology and Organizational Transformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
VENKATRAMAN, N; RAMANUJAM, V. Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches. Academy of Management Review, v. 11-4, 1986.
WEILL, P., SUBRAMANI, M. e BROABENT, M. Building IT Infrastructure for Strategic Agility.
MIT Sloan Management Review, p. 57-56, Fall, 2002.
WETZELS, M. et al. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models:
guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, v. 33, n. 1, p. 177-195, mar., 2009.
WOLD, H. Soft Modeling: the basic design and some extensions. In JÖRESKOG, K. G.; WOLD, H.
(Ed.). Systems under indirect observation: causality, structure and prediction. Part II. Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing company, 1982. p. 1-54.
WU, J. H., WANG, Y. M.. Measuring KMS success: a respecification of the DeLone and McLean’s
model. Information & Management, 43 (6), p. 728–739, 2006.
YOSHIKUNI, A, C., ALBERTIN, L. A. The impact of use of Informationa Systems and Competitive Strategy on Brazilian Companies Performance. 44th Decision Science Institute Annual
Meeting 2013, Baltimore, Nov 16 – 19, 2013.
YOSHINO, M. Y.; SRINIVASARANGAN, U. Strategic Alliances: An Entrepreneurial Approach to
Globalization. Harvard Business Press. 1995.
