Perception of employees on their involvement in the implementation of Cemig's strategy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7213/rebrae.11.001.AO04Palabras clave:
Strategy. Knowledge Management. Strategy implementation. Strategy Focused Or-ganization (SFO).Resumen
The objective of this study was to evaluate the employees' perception of their involvement in the strategy implementation process of Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CEMIG). In order to understand the employees' involvement with this topic, it was analyzed the Strategy Focused Organization (SFO), an important and consolidated tool applied for 8 years to all employees. The company's documents and files were analyzed and direct observation was applied, allowing a triangulation of data. Analysis categories were used for evaluation of SFO in the period of 2011-2015. The results revealed that there is a perception of employees’ involvement, understanding and direct participation in the implementation of CEMIG's strategy. These influences, however, are variable. One point of concern is that one significant portion of employees does not consider themselves sufficiently informed about the organizational strategy, which is not desirable when seeking higher alignment of people in the implementation of the strategy. It was identified the importance of the leader in the process of employee involvement with the strategy. However, while important, not all leaders play the role of strategy's multipliers to the employees. It is concluded that there is already a relevant effort to involve employees in the entire strategy implementation process. However, we realize that there is still to evolve on several levels. It is possible to believe that, once the direct contact between the leader and the team would be extended and matured, it will be possible to foster knowledge internalization and strengthen their individual contribution to reach the strategy.
Descargas
Citas
ALEXANDER, L. Successfully implementing strategic decisions. Long Range Planning, v. 18, n. 3, 1985.
BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2002.
COMPANHIA ENERGÉTICA DE MINAS GERAIS. Disponível em: http://www.cemig.com.br/pt-br/a_cemig/quem_somos/Paginas/missao_visao_valores.aspx. Acesso em: 20 ago. 2017.
DUNLOP, A.; FIRTH, V.; LURIE, Robert. Dynamic strategy implementation: delivering on your strategic ambition. Monitor, 1-15, 2012.
EISENHARDT, K. M. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Standford University. Academy of Management Review. Standford, n. 4, v. 14, 1989.
GALAS, E.S.; FORTE, S. H. A. C. Fatores que interferem na implantação de um modelo de gestão estratégica baseado no Balanced Scorecard: estudo de caso em uma instituição públi-ca. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, ano 6, n.2, 2005.
GREENWOOD, E. Metodos principales de investigación social empírica. In: Metodologia de la investigación social. Buenos Aires, Paidós, 1973.
JICK, T. D. Mixing Qualitative and quantitative Methods: triangulation in action. Administra-tive Science Quartely. Cornell University, v. 24, 1979.
KAPLAN, R. S.; NORTON, D. P. A estratégia em ação: Balanced Scorecard. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1997.
KAPLAN, R. S.; NORTON, D. P. Organização orientada para a estratégia. Rio de Janeiro: Else-vier, 2000.
KAPLAN, R. S.; NORTON, D. P. Mapas estratégicos. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2004.
KAPLAN, R. S.; NORTON, D. P. Alinhamento - Utilizando o Balanced Scorecard para Criar Sinergias Corporativas. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2006.
KAPLAN, R. S.; NORTON, D. P. A execução premium: a obtenção de vantagem competitiva através do vínculo da estratégia com as operações de negócio. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2008.
KICH, J. I. D. F; PEREIRA, M. F. A influência da liderança, cultura, estrutura e comunicação organizacional no processo de implantação do planejamento estratégico. Revista Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 9(4), 2011.
LANGLEY, A. Strategies for theorizing from process data. The Academy of Management Re-view, 24, 4, 691-710, 1999.
MALINA, M. A; SELTO, F. H. Communication and controlling strategy: an empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard. University of Colorado at Boulder and University of Melbourne, 2001.
PETTIGREW, A. M. Context and action in the transformation of the firm. Journal of Manage-ment Studies, 24, 6, 1987.
SYMNETICS. Diagnóstico SFO (2003). Disponível em: http://www.tantum.com/tantum/articulos/pdf/diagnosticosfo.pdf. Acesso em: 20 ago. 2017.
STOLLENWERK, M. F. L. Gestão do conhecimento, inteligência competitiva e estratégia empresarial: em busca de uma abordagem integrada. Anais do Workshop Brasileiro de Inte-ligência Competitiva, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil, 1999.
TERRA, J. C. C.; ALMEIDA, C. Gestão do Conhecimento e Inteligência Competitiva: duas faces da mesma moeda. Recuperado de http://biblioteca.terraforum.com.br/Paginas/Gest%C3%A3odoConhecimentoeIntelig%C3%AAnciaCompetitivaduasfacesdamesmamoeda.aspx, 2012.
WIT, B. de; MEYER, R. Strategy: process, content, context. 2. ed. London: International Thom-son Business Press, 1998.
YIN, R. K. Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005.