Strategic organizational adaptation under multiple theoretical lenses: sudy og Weg Between 1961-2013

Authors

  • Darlan Parucker Lueders
  • Queila Regina Souza Matitz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7213/rebrae.09.002.AO05

Keywords:

Strategy, Organization, Adaptation, Environment, Theories.

Abstract

Studies on strategic organizational adaptation are related to the development and application of descriptive and explanatory theories of strategic options and the degree of potential organizational mobilization in response to internal and external elements potentially influential of strategic decision making. The main objective of this research was to analyze the individual and joint explanatory power of organizational strategic adaptation theories, based on changes in the strategic content of a large Brazilian organization over 40 years of history. Methodologically, it is a qualitative, descriptive and analytical study. Secondary data were collected in books about the corporate history and information available in official media about the organization. The results demonstrated complementarities between the theories used to explain the organizational strategic adaptation phenomenon. Among the key findings, it appears that the understanding of the organizational strategic adaptation process in longitudinal perspective is a phenomenon that requires multiple theoretical
lenses. Moreover, it results from the interaction between internal and external elements of the organization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BANDEIRA-DE-MELLO, R; CUNHA, C. J. C. A. (2004). Administrando o risco: uma teoria substantiva da adaptação estratégica de pequenas empresas a ambientes turbulentos e com forte

influência governamental. RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea, Curitiba, v.8, n.

especial, pp. 157-180.

BARDIN, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70.

BIGNETTI, L. P; PAIVA, E. L. (2002, jan./abr.). Ora (direis) ouvir estrelas! Estudo das citações

de autores de estratégia na produção acadêmica brasileira. RAE - Revista de Administração

Contemporânea, v. 6, n. 1, pp. 105-125.

BOOTH, C; ROWLINSON, M. (2006). Management and organizational history: prospects.

Management e Organizational History, v. 1. n. 1, pp. 5-30.

CARLEY, K. M; LEE, J. (1998). Dynamic Organizations: organizational adaptation in a changing environment. Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 15, pp. 269-297.

CHAKRAVARTHY, B. S. (Jan., 1982). Adaptation: A Promising Metaphor for Strategic Management. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 35-44.

COASE, R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, v. 4, pp. 386-405.

DIMAGGIO, P. J; POWELL, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism

and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, v. 48, pp.147-

DONALDSON, L. (ed.). (1995). Contingency Theory (History of Management Thought). 9.

Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.

DONALDSON, T; PRESTON, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, v. 20, n. 1, pp. 65-91.

FREEMAN, R. E; REED, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and Stakeholders: a new perspective on

corporate governance. California Management Review, v. 25, n. 3, pp. 88-106.

FRIEDMAN, A. L; MILES, S. (2002). Developing Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Management

Studies, v. 39, n. 1, pp. 1-21.

HANNAN, M. T; FREEMAN, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American

Journal of Sociology, v. 82, pp.924-964.

HREBINIAK, L. G; JOYCE, W. F. (1985). Organizational Adaptation: Strategic Choice and

Environmental Determinism. Administrative Science Quarterly, n. 30, p. 336-349.

JOHNSON, G; SCHOLES, K; WHITTINGTON, R. (2007). Exploring Corporate Strategy. Harlow:

Prentice Hall.

JOSEPH, J; WILLIAM, O. (2012). Architecture, attention, and adaptation in the multibusiness firm: General electric from 1951 to 2001. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.33(6), pp.

-660.

LEVINTHAL, D. A; MARINO, A. (jan., 2015). Three Facets of Organizational Adaptation:

Selection, Variety, and Plasticity. Organization Science, Vol.26, Issue 3, pp.743-755.

LOBO, E. L. História empresarial. In: CARDOSO, C. F; VAINFAS, R. (org.). (1997). Domínios

da história: ensaios de teoria e metodologia. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, pp. 217-239.

MELLO DA COSTA, A. S; BARROS, D. F; MARTINS, P. E. M. (2010, jul. /set.). Perspectiva Histó-

rica em Administração: Novos Objetos, Novos Problemas, Novas Abordagens. RAE – Revista

de Administração de Empresas, São Paulo, v. 50, n. 3, pp. 288-299.

PETTIGREW, A; THOMAS, H; WHITTINGTON, R. (eds.). (2006). Handbook of Strategy and

Management. Sage Publications, 2006.

PFEFFER, J; SALANCIK, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource

Dependence Perspective. Nova York: Harper e Row, 1978.

RODRIGUES NETO, A; FREITAS, L. S. (2012, jan. /abr.). Análise do processo de adaptação

estratégica de uma empresa produtora de cachaça à luz da teoria institucional e da

visão baseada em recursos. REAd – Revista Eletrônica de Administração, Porto Alegre, edi-

ção 71, n.1, pp. 211-241.

ROSSETO, C; ROSSETO, A. (2005). Teoria Institucional e Dependência de Recursos na

Adaptação Organizacional: uma visão complementar. RAE-eletrônica, v. 4, 2005.

SÁNCHEZ, A; LAGO, A; FERRÀS, X; RIBERA, J. (2011). Innovation Management Practices,

Strategic Adaptation, and Business Results: Evidence from the Electronics Industry. Journal

of Technology Management & Innovation, Vol.6(2), pp.14-39.

SCHINDEHUTTE, M; MORRIS, M. H. (2001). Understanding strategic adaptation in small

firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, Vol. 7, Iss: 3, pp. 84-107.

Downloads

Published

2016-07-27

How to Cite

Parucker Lueders, D., & Souza Matitz, Q. R. (2016). Strategic organizational adaptation under multiple theoretical lenses: sudy og Weg Between 1961-2013. REBRAE, 9(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.7213/rebrae.09.002.AO05

Issue

Section

Articles