The human resources management of a democratic action: intentionality, elements and functioning

Authors

  • Evandro Bocatto
  • Eloisa Perez-de-Toledo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7213/rebrae.11.001.AO09

Keywords:

Citizenship Development and Engagement. Content Analysis. Participatory. Budgeting.

Abstract

In reaction to the issue of citizens’ distrust, apathy and disengagement from representative democracy, we investigate democratic actions in which participation, deliberation, and political engagement take place: the participatory budgeting (PB) of municipalities. By integrating two epistemologies, historical-hermeneutic and empirical-analytical, we interpret the intentions to commit, and analyze the enabling conditions of its implementation, viz., PB’s human resources management. Content analysis methodology converts pieces of narratives into units of meaning, we provide evidences of the reasons why this reality is socially created, and capture its functioning. Findings from five cities show that the PB starts with the local government’s intention to respond to historical demands of civil society regarding direct participation in government. As a mean to this goal, we explain the human resources practices of attracting, developing, and retaining participants. We provide a practical benchmark for local authorities’ policy development, and for the literature of participatory management in municipalities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Evandro Bocatto

PhD in Management Sciences – ESADE/University Ramon LLull, Barcelona, CAT, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]

Eloisa Perez-de-Toledo

PhD – University Autonoma of Barcelona, Barcelona, CAT, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]  

References

Abers, R. (2000). Inventing local democracy : grassroots politics in Brazil. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Andrews, R., Cowell, R., Downe, J., Martin, S., & Turner, D. (2008). Supporting effective citi-zenship in local government: engaging, educating and empowering local citizens. Local Gov-ernment Studies, 34(4), 489-507.

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1963). Intention (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

Azevedo, S. d. e. F., Rodrigo Barroso (2005). Orcamento participativo: Construindo a demo-cracia. Rio de Janeiro: Revan.

Baiocchi, G. (2001). The Porto Alegre Experiment and Deliberative Democratic Theory. Poli-tics & Society, 29(0), 43-72.

Berman, E. M. (1997). Dealing with cynical citizens. Public Administration Review, 57(2), 105-112.

Bocatto, E., & Perez-de-Toledo, E. (2008). A democratic story: collaboration in the use of public budget. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 28(1/2), 20-31.

Bocatto, E., & Perez-de-Toledo, E. (2012). Empowering the people: Lessons from a new trend in political marketing. In I. Alon, E. Jaffe, & D. Vianelli (Eds.), Global Marketing Contempo-rary Theory, Practice, and Cases (pp. 459-464). USA: McGraw-Hill.

Boyte, H. C. (1996). Building America: The democratic promise of public work: Temple University Press.

Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multi-trait-multimethod matrix. Psychological bulletin, 56(2), 81.

Census_Bureau. (2009). Voter Turnout Increases by 5 Million in 2008 Presidential Election, U.S. Census Bureau Reports. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/voting/cb09-110.html.

Chicago_City_Hall. (2012). Aldermen & Community groups pilot new model of democratic budgeting for Chicago. Retrieved from http://www.pbchicago.org/uploads/1/3/5/3/13535542/pbchicagopressrelease.

Churchill, S. D., & Wertz, F. J. (2001). An introduction to phenomenological research in psy-chology: Historical, conceptual, and methodological foundations. In K. J. Schneider, J. F. T. Bugental, & J. F. Pierson (Eds.), The handbook of humanistic psychology: Leading edges in theory, research and practice (pp. 247-262). London: Sage.

Deci, E. L., & Flaste, R. (1995). Why we do what we do : the dynamics of personal autonomy. New York: Putnam.

DeHart‐Davis, L. (2007). The unbureaucratic personality. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 892-903.

Dias, M. R. (2002). Sob o signo da vontade popular: o orçamento participativo eo dilema da Câmara Municipal de Porto Alegre (Vol. 6): Editora UFMG.

Dray, W. H. (1964). Philosophy of history (Vol. 5): Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Dutra, O., & de Mesquita Benevides, M. V. (2001). Orçamento participativo e socialismo: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo.

Ebdon, C., & Franklin, A. (2004). Searching for a Role for Citizens in the Budget Process. Public Budgeting & Finance, 24(1), 32-49.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of manage-ment review, 14(4), 532-550.

Elections_Canada. (2008). Estimation of Voter Turnout by Age Group at the 39th Federal General Election. Retrieved from http://www.elections.ca/res/loi/rep39ge/estimation39ge_e.pdf.

Falbe, C. M., & Yukl, G. (1992). Consequences for managers of using single influence tactics and combinations of tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 638-652.

Ferris, G. R., Hochwarter, W. A., Buckley, M. R., Harrell-Cook, G., & Frink, D. D. (1999). Hu-man resources management: Some new directions. Journal of Management, 25(3), 385-415.

Frankl, V. E. (1985). Man's search for meaning: Simon and Schuster.

Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business ethics quarterly, 409-421.

Frisby, M., & Bowman, M. (1996). What we have here is a failure to communicate. Public Management, 78(2), A1-A5.

Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66-75.

Genro, T. F., & de Souza, U. J. I. (1997). Orçamento participativo: a experiência de Porto Ale-gre: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo.

Giorgi, A. (1985). Phenomenology and psychological research: Duquesne Univ Pr.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualita-tive research: Transaction Books.

Habermas, J. (1966). Knowledge and interest∗ 1. Inquiry, 9(1-4), 285-300.

Hamlin, R. G. (2004). In support of universalistic models of managerial and leadership effec-tiveness: implications for HRD research and practice. Human Resource Development Quar-terly, 15(2), 189-215.

Haney, W., Russell, M., Gulek, C., & Fierros, E. (1998). Drawing on Education: Using Student Drawings To Promote Middle School Improvement. Schools in the Middle, 7(3), 38-43.

Herbert, S. P. (2008). Orçamento Participativo na perspectiva de Freire e Gramsci: Condições para a emergência e a formação de lideranças. Porto Alegre: Redes.

Herzberg, F. (1993). The motivation to work: Transaction Publishers.

Hickey, S., & Mohan, G. (2005). Relocating participation within a radical politics of devel-opment. Development and change, 36(2), 237-262.

Hodder, I. (2003). The interpretation of documents and material culture. Collecting and in-terpreting qualitative materials, 2, 155-175.

Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1997). The active interview: Sage Publications.

International_IDEA. (2009). Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance's 'Voter Turn-out' Report. Retrieved from http://www.idea.int/vt/.

Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55-65.

Izquierdo, J. O. R., & Gomà, R. (2001). El modelo de presupuesto participativo de Porto Ale-gre. Paper presented at the Ciudadanos y decisiones públicas.

Koliba, C. J. (2000). Moral Language and Networks of Engagement Service Learning and Civic Education. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(5), 825-838.

Krueger, R. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research: Sage.

Kuhn, T. S. (1996 (1962)). The structure of scientific revolutions: University of Chicago press.

Lincoln, Y., & Denzin, N. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. Denzin, NK and Lincoln, YS (1994) The Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications.

Maslow, A. H. (1987). (1970) Motivation and personality: New York: Harper and Row.

Maslow, A. H., Stephens, D. C., Heil, G., & Bennis, W. (1998). Maslow on management: John Wiley New York.

Menezes, I. (2003). Participation experiences and civic concepts, attitudes and engagement: implications for citizenship education projects. European Educational Research Journal, 2(3), 430-445.

Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). The big question for performance management: why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 849-866.

Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1980). A model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 9(2), 35-51.

Neshkova, M. I., & Guo, H. D. (2012). Public participation and organizational performance: Evidence from state agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(2), 267-288.

Oswick, C., Keenoy, T., & Grant, D. (2002). Note: Metaphor and analogical reasoning in organ-ization theory: Beyond orthodoxy. Academy of management review, 27(2), 294-303.

Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organiza-tion science, 1(3), 267-292.

RBOP. (2015). Pesquisa da Rede Brasileira de Orçamento Participativo. Retrieved from http://www.anfermed.com.br/redeop/newop/.

Ribeiro, A. C. T., & Grazia, G. d. (2003). Experiência de orçamento participativo no Brasil (1997-2000). Petrópolis: Vozes/Fórum Nacional de Participação Popular.

Roberts, N. (2004). Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. The American Review of Public Administration, 34(4), 315-353.

Sánchez, F. R. (2002). Orçamento participativo: teoria e prática (Vol. 97): Cortez.

Schutz, A. (1972). Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action: Springer.

Searle, J. (1995). The social construction of reality. London: Allen Lane.

Sender, S. W. (1997). Systematic agreement: A theory of organizational alignment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 8(1), 23-40.

Singer, P. I. (1996). Um governo de esquerda para todos: Luiza Erundina na prefeitura de São Paulo, 1989-92: Editora Brasiliense.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1997). Grounded theory in practice: SAGE Publications, Incorpo-rated.

Van de Walle, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2003). Public service performance and trust in govern-ment: the problem of causality. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(8-9), 891-913.

Van de Walle, S., & Bovaird, T. (2007). Making better use of information to drive improve-ment in local public services: A report for the Audit Commission.

Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Mizrahi, S. (2008). Public sector management and the democratic ethos: A 5-year study of key relationships in Israel. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(1), 79-107.

Warren, M. E. (2011). Citizen Participation and Democratic Deficits: Considerations from the Perspective of Democratic Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi-structured methods: Sage.

Wertz, F. J. (1983). From everyday to psychological description: Analyzing the moments of a qualitative data analysis. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology.

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5): Sage.

Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Carpini, M. X. D. (2006). A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-18

How to Cite

Bocatto, E., & Perez-de-Toledo, E. (2017). The human resources management of a democratic action: intentionality, elements and functioning. REBRAE, 11(1), 142–165. https://doi.org/10.7213/rebrae.11.001.AO09

Issue

Section

Articles