Physiological and symptomatological responses to two functional tests in adults with asthma

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/fm.2026.39107

Abstract

Introduction: People with asthma may experience impairment in exercise capacity and activities of daily living (ADLs). The six-minute walk test (6MWT) assesses functional exercise capacity, and the Glittre Activities of Daily Living test (TGlittre-ADL) assesses performance in ADLs. Objective: To compare the physiological and symptomatic responses of the 6MWT and the TGlittre-ADL in adults with asthma. Methods: Adults with asthma were evaluated for pulmonary function, functional capacity, performance in ADLs, asthma control and severity, and quality of life. Symptomatic responses (Borg fatigue scale - BorgF and dyspnea scale - BorgD) and physiological responses were recorded at the beginning and end of the TGlittre-ADL and the 6MWT: systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), peak expiratory flow (PEF). Delta values ​​(Δ = post–pre) were calculated and the Wilcoxon test was used for comparisons. Results: Fifty-eight adults were included (69% women, 44 ± 15 years, body mass index: 26 [22-30] kg/m2, forced expiratory volume in the first second: 80 ± 7% predicted, 6MWT: 559 ± 88 meters and TGlittre-ADL: 190 [174-232] seconds). There was a higher ΔSpO2 in the 6MWT (p = 0.013) and ΔHR in the TGlittre-ADL (p < 0.001), with no difference between the tests in ΔSBP, ΔDBP, ΔBorgD, ΔBorgF and ΔPEF. Conclusion: Although there were no differences in the sensation of dyspnea and fatigue, nor in the inotropic response, between the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and the TGlittre-ADL test showed a greater chronotropic response in the TGlittre-ADL test and greater variation in SpO2 in the 6MWT. Researchers and clinicians evaluating adults with asthma should consider that these two tests are not interchangeable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Caroline Sydloski Bidoia, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)

Pulmonary Physiotherapy Research Laboratory (LFIP), Department of Physiotherapy

Vitória Cavalheiro Puzzi, Universidade Pitágoras Unopar Anhanguera

Master's and Doctoral Program in Rehabilitation Sciences

Natielly Beatriz Soares Correia, Universidade Pitágoras Unopar Anhanguera

Master's and Doctoral Program in Rehabilitation Sciences

Ariele Pedroso, Universidade Pitágoras Unopar Anhanguera

Master's and Doctoral Program in Rehabilitation Sciences

Joice Mara de Oliveira, Universidade Pitágoras Unopar Anhanguera

Master's and Doctoral Program in Rehabilitation Sciences

Adriano Minuzzo Massoni, Universidade Pitágoras Unopar Anhanguera

Master's and Doctoral Program in Physical Exercise for Health Promotion

Karina Couto Furlanetto, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Universidade Pitágoras Unopar Anhanguera

Pulmonary Physiotherapy Research Laboratory (LFIP/UEL); Master's and Doctoral Program in Physical Exercise for Health Promotion and Master's and Doctoral Program in Rehabilitation Sciences (Pitágoras Unopar Anhanguera University)

Downloads

Published

2026-05-25

Issue

Section

Original Article