Spatial fragmentation and self-organisation: a negative relationship in Brazilian metropolises
Keywords:
Spatial Fragmentation, self-organisation, self-organised initiatives, self-governanceAbstract
While Brazilian metropolises are spatially fragmented, at the same time they have abundant bottom-up, spontaneous, self-organised initiatives that usually emerge as a response to weak or negligent public authorities. Both phenomena are influencing Brazilian metropolises, but we do not know how they influence each other. This paper aims to answer the question: To what extent does spatial fragmentation influence self-organised initiatives? The article is based on analysis of data collected in the municipality of São Paulo. It first develops a theoretical reflection on both concepts, fragmentation and self-organisation, followed by an outline of the methods and analysis. The work is based on a series of in-depth interviews and field observations of six self-organised initiatives. The results show that the spatial fragmentation pattern observed in São Paulo is defined by a strongly polarised urban structure that heavily influences the operation of self-organised initiatives. This imposes a limitation on the work area of self-organised initiatives. The study indicates that the relationship between spatial fragmentation and self-organised initiatives, however, is not straightforward. Moreover, spatial fragmentation hinders the expansion of the work of self-organised initiatives.
Downloads
References
Angel, S., Parent, J., & Civco, D. L. (2012). The fragmentation of urban landscapes: global evidence of a key attribute of the spatial structure of cities, 1990–2000. Environment and Urbanization, 24(1), 249-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956247811433536.
Ashby, W. R. (1947). Principles of the self-organizing dynamic system. The Journal of General Psychology, 37(2), 125-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1947.9918144. PMid:20270223.
Balbo, M., & Navez-Bouchanine, F. (1995). Urban fragmentation as a research hypothesis: rabat-salé case study. Habitat International, 19(4), 571-582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0197-3975(95)00008-4.
Caldeira, T. P. R. (2000). City of walls. Crime, segregation, and citizenship in São Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cortes, J. M. G. (2008). Politicas do espaço. São Paulo: Senac Editora.
D’Ottaviano, M. C. L. (2008). Condomínios fechados na Região Metropolitana de São Paulo: fim do modelo centro rico versus periferia pobre? (Tese de doutorado). University of São Paulo, São Paulo. http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/T.16.2008.tde-25032010-091246.
Dam, R. v., Eshuis, J., & Aarts, N. (2009). Transition starts with people: self-organising communities ADM and Golf Residence Dronten. In K. Poppe, C. Termeer, & M. Slingerland (Eds.), Transitions: towards sustainable agriculture and food chains in peri-urban areas (pp. 81-92). The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Dramstad, W. E., Olson, J. D., & Forman, R. T. T. (1996). Landscape ecology principles in landscape architecture and land-use planning. Washington: American Society of Landscape Architects.
Eigen, M. (1971). Molecular self-organization and the early stages of evolution. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics, 4(2), 149-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033583500000627. PMid:5134461.
Foerster, H., & Zoepf, G. W. (1962). Principles of self-organisation. New York: Pergamon.
Haken, H. (1983). Synergetics: an introduction: nonequilibrium phase transitions and self-organization in physics, chemistry, and biology (3rd rev. and enl. ed.). New York: Springer.
Heylighen, F. (2008). Complexity and self-organization. In M. J. Bates & M. N. Maack (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE. (2010). Aglomerados subnormais: informações territoriais. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. Retrieved in 2018, January 03, from http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/presidencia/noticias/imprensa/ppts/00000015164811202013480105748802.pdf
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE. (2015a). População presente e residente. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. Retrieved in 2018, January 03, from http://seriesestatisticas.ibge.gov.br/series.aspx?no=10&op=0&vcodigo=CD90&t=populacao-presente-residente
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE. (2015b). Taxa de urbanização. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. Retrieved in 2018, January 03, from http://seriesestatisticas.ibge.gov.br/series.aspx?no=10&op=0&vcodigo=POP122&t=taxa-urbanizacao
Kee, T., & Miazzo, F. (2014). We own the city: enabling community practice in architecture and urban planning. Amsterdam: TrancityxValiz.
Kotus, J., & Hławka, B. (2010). Urban neighbourhood communities organised on-line – A new form of self-organisation in the Polish city? Cities (London, England), 27(4), 204-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.12.010.
Kovacic, Z., & Giampietro, M. (2016). Between theory and quantification: an integrated analysis of metabolic patterns of informal urban settlements. Energy Policy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.047.
Lister, N. M., Brocki, M., & Ament, R. (2015). Integrated adaptive design for wildlife movement under climate change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 13(9), 493-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/150080.
Lydon, M., & Garcia, A. (2015). Tactical urbanism. Washington: Island Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-567-0.
Maricato, E. (2011). O impasse da política urbana no Brasil. Petrópolis: Vozes.
Newman, L., Waldron, L., Dale, A., & Carriere, K. (2008). Sustainable urban community development from the grassroots: challenges and opportunities in a pedestrian street initiative. Local Environment, 13(2), 129-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13549830701581879.
Nunbogu, A. M., Korah, P. I., Cobbinah, P. B., & Poku-Boansi, M. (2017). Doing it ‘ourselves’: civic initiative and self-governance in spatial planning. Cities (London, England), 74, 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.022.
ORGANISMO PARQUE AUGUSTA – OPA. (2019). Retrieved in 2019, September 09, from http://issuu.com/organismopa
Pessoa, I. M., Tasan-Kok, T., & Altes, W. K. (2016). Brazilian urban porosity: treat or threat? Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Urban Design and Planning, 169(2), 47-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/udap.15.00009.
Portugali, J. (1999). Self-organization and the city. New York: Springer.
Rauws, W. (2016). Civic initiatives in urban development: self-governance versus self-organisation in planning practice. The Town Planning Review, 87(3), 339-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2016.23.
Ribeiro, L. C. Q., & Ribeiro, M. G. (2013). Ibeu: índice de bem-estar urbano. Rio de Janeiro: Letra Capital.
Sabatini, F., & Salcedo, R. (2007). Gated communities and the poor in Santiago, Chile: functional and symbolic integration in a context of aggressive capitalist colonization of lower‐class areas. Housing Policy Debate, 18(3), 577-606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2007.9521612.
Santos, M. (1990). Metrópole Corporativa Fragmentada: o caso de São Paulo. São Paulo: Nobel.
Santos, M. (2009). Metrópole corporativa fragmentada. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo.
Santos, M., & Dias, J. F. (1982). A urbanização desigual: a especificidade do fenômeno urbano em países subdesenvolvidos. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.
Schmidt-Thome, K., Wallin, S., Laatikainen, T., Kangasoja, J., & Kyttä, M. (2014). Exploring the use of PPGIS in self-organizing urban development: case softGIS in Pacific Beach. The Journal of Community Informatics. 10(3). Retrieved in 2018, January 03, from http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/1080/1111
Swyngedouw, E., & Moulaert, F. (2010). Can neighbourhoods save the city?: community development and social innovation. In F. Moulaert (Ed.), Regions and cities (pp. 219-234). New York: Routledge.
Tonkens, E. (2008). De bal bij de burger: burgerschap en publieke moraal in een pluriforme, dynamische samenleving. Amsterdam: Vossiuspers UvA. http://dx.doi.org/10.5117/9789056295370.
Villaça, F. F. F. (2011). São Paulo: segregação urbana e desigualdade. Estudos Avançados, 25(71), 37-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142011000100004.
Wunsch, J. S. J. J. S. (2013). Analyzing self-organized local governance initiatives: are there insights for decentralization reforms? Public Administration and Development, 33(3), 221-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pad.1652.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published online and in open access under Creative Commons Attribution license (by). The urbe magazine allows unrestricted access, filing and disclosure of the published final version of the article, and does not authorize the archiving and dissemination of other versions prior to its publication.
