Is psychic distance still relevant for internationalization decisions?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7213/rebrae.v12i1.24654Palavras-chave:
Psychic distance, Internationalization strategy, Brazil, Emergent country.Resumo
Psychic distance has been considered for decades as one of the main drivers of companies’ internationalization decisions. However, changes in the competitive environment caused by the accelerated diffusion of information technologies and increased global integration has led us to reconsider whether this concept remains useful to managers. This study aimed to identify the determinants of psychic distance and the strength of their influence in decision-making during the internationalization process of firms. Following Brewer’s (2007) work, which analyzed the key concepts and ideas about psychic distance from 1996 to 2006, we extended the analyzed period, considering published articles from 2007 up to 2014. From the composition of both periods, we set up the main factors updated. Additionally, we conducted a survey with 35 companies in order to validate research findings. Results show that, as economic factors gain more relevance in market analysis, cultural factors have significantly lost importance as the key drivers of internationalization decisions.
Downloads
Referências
ANDERSEN, O. On the internationalization process of firms: A critical analysis. Journal of international business studies, 24(2), 209-231. 1993.
BECKERMAN, W. Distance and the Pattern of Intra-European Trade. The Review of Eco-nomics and Statistics, 38(1), 31-40. https://doi:10.2307/1925556. 1956.
BREWER, P. A. Psychic distance and Australian export market selection. Australian Journal of Management, 32(1), 73-94. 2007.
BUCKLEY, P. J., CASSON, M. The future of the multinational enterprise. Londres: Macmil-lan. 1977.
CHILD, J., NG, S. H; WONG, C. Psychic distance and internationalization: Evidence from Hong Kong firms. International Studies of Management & Organization, 32(1), 36-56. 2002.
CONWAY, T., SWIFT, J. S. "International relationship marketing ‐ The importance of psychic distance", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 34 Issue: 11/12, pp.1391-1414, https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560010348641. 2000.
COVIELLO, N., KANO, L., LIESCH, P. W. Adapting the Uppsala model to a modern world: Macro-context and microfoundations. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(9): 1151-1164. 2017.
DUNNING, J. H. The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of international business studies, 19(1), 1-31. 1988.
FREEMAN, S., GIROUD, A., KALFADELLIS, P; GHAURI, P. Psychic distance and environment: impact on increased resource commitment. European Business Review, 24(4), 351-373. 2012.
GERSCHEWSKI Stephan, "Improving on the Kogut and Singh metric of psychic distance", Multinational Business Review, Vol. 21 Issue: 3, pp.257-268, https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-04-2013-0019. 2013.
GIL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. São Paulo, 5(61), 16-17. 2002.
HÅKANSON, L; AMBOS, B. The antecedents of psychic distance. Journal of International Management, 16(3), 195-210. 2010.
HÅKANSON, L; DOW, D. Markets and networks in international trade: On the role of distanc-es in globalization. Management International Review, 52, 761–789. 2012.
LARS, Håkanson, "The role of psychic distance in international trade: a longitudinal analy-sis", International Marketing Review, v. 31 Issue: 3, pp.210-236, https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-04-2013-0079. 2014.
HALLEN, L; WIEDERSHEIM-PAUL, F. Psychic distance and buyer-seller interaction. The internationalization of the firm: a reader. London, Harcourt, 291-302. 1993.
HEMAIS, C. A; HILAL, A. Teorias, paradigma e tendências em negócios internacionais: de Hymer ao empreendedorismo. O desafio dos mercados externos: teoria e prática na inter-nacionalização da firma. Rio de Janeiro: Mauad, 1, 17-39. 2004.
HENNART, J. F. A theory of multinational enterprise. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 1982.
HYMER, S. H. The international operation of national firms: a study of foreign direct investment. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. 1976.
JOHANSON, J; VAHLNE, J. E. Management of internationalization. Perspectives on strate-gic change, 43-71. 1993.
JOHANSON, J; VAHLNE, J. E. The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of international business stud-ies, 40(9), 1411-1431.. 2009.
JOHANSON, J; WIEDERSHEIM‐PAUL, F. The internationalization of the firm—four Swedish cases. Journal of management studies, 12(3), 305-323. 1975.
KOGUT, B; SINGH, H. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of international business studies, 19(3), 411-432. 1988.
LEE, D. J. The effect of cultural distance on the relational exchange between exporters and importers: the case of Australian exporters. Journal of Global Marketing, 11(4), 7-22. 1998.
MADSEN, T. K; SERVAIS, P. The internationalization of born globals: an evolutionary pro-cess? International business review, 6(6), 561-583. 1997.
MAGNANI, G., ZUCCHELLA, A; FLORIANI, D. E. The logic behind foreign market selection: Objective distance dimensions vs. strategic objectives and psychic distance. International Business Review, 27(1), 1-20. 2018.
MOEN, O. The born globals: a new generation of small European exporters. International Marketing Review, 19(2), 156-175. 2002.
OJALA, A; TYRVÄINEN, P. Impact of psychic distance to the internationalization behavior of knowledge-intensive SMEs. European Business Review, 21(3), 263-277. 2009.
REID, S. D. The decision-maker and export entry and expansion. Journal of international business studies, 12(2), 101-112. 1981.
SCHWEIZER, R., VAHLNE, J. E; JOHANSON, J. Internationalization as an entrepreneurial process. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 8(4), 343-370. 2010.
SILVA, M. G. F., ROCHA, Â. M. C; FIGUEIREDO, O. Medindo o construto da distância psíquica. Economia & Gestão, 7(14), 85-106. 2008.
SWIFT, J. S. Cultural closeness as a facet of cultural affinity: A contribution to the theory of psychic distance. International Marketing Review, 16(3), 182-201. 1999.
VAHLNE, J. E; JOHANSON, J. The Uppsala model on evolution of the multinational business enterprise–from internalization to coordination of networks. International Marketing Review, 30(3), 189-210. 2013.
VERNON, R. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarter-ly Journal of Economics, 80(2), 190-207. 1966.
WIEDERSHEIM-PAUL, F., OLSON, H. C; WELCH, L. S. Pre-export activity: The first step in internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 47-58. 1978.
