Does the adoption of sustainable practices lefitimise an organization?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7213/rebrae.09.002.AO01Palavras-chave:
Sustainability, Legitimacy, Cycling.Resumo
The objective of this article is analyse how the sustainable practices adoption can contribute for the organization's legitimacy. Therefore, it was chosen the case of an organization that adopts sustainable behaviours when realizing services of expresses delivery using bicycles. Having a qualitativedescriptive approach, the study occurred in a company in the city of Curitiba, by means of interviews semi structured realized with managers and the use of the content analysis. The results evinced the three dimensions of sustainability (economic, social and environmental) are interconnected and are complementary, in a such way that social and environmental practices have proximity to the economic dimension, as well as, this last maintains relations to social and environmental practices. Although the franchise does not have sustainable practices standardized in its business units, it acts exteriorizing its sustainable role. The promotion of sustainable practices disseminated a positive image of the company in relation to its environment, contributing for its legitimacy in front of society with action in schools and with benefits to its employees. The study's main contribution allows to infer that the adoption of sustainable practices contributes for the organization's legitimacy allowing its recognition towards society. In this way, the legitimacy emphasizes the importance of the exercise of sustainability in organizations, improving its image and relationshipwith the several actors involved.
Downloads
Referências
ALDRICH, H. E; FIOL, C. M. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, v.19, n.4, p.645-670, out. 1994.
BARBIERI, J. C; CAJAZEIRA, J. E. R. Responsabilidade social empresarial e empresa sustentável: da teoria à prática 2. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2012.
BARBIERI, J. C; VASCONCELOS, I. F. G; ANDREASSI, T; VASCONCELOS, F. C. Inovação e Sustentabilidade: Novos Modelos e Proposições. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v.50, n.2,
p.146-154, 2010.
BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. 3. ed. Lisboa: Edição 70, 2004.
BEILER, M. O. Organizational sustainability in transportation planning: Evaluation of
multi-jurisdictional agency collaboration. Journal of Transport Geography, v.52, p.29-37, 2016.
BELLEN, H. M. V. Indicadores de Sustentabilidade: uma análise comparativa. 2. ed. Rio de
Janeiro: FGV, 2006.
BERGER, P; LUCKMANN, T. A Construção Social da Realidade. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1985.
BOOZ A. H. Strategic Issues Facing Transportation: Sustainability as an Organizing Principle
for Transportation Agencies. NCHRP Report 750, v. 4. Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 2014. Disponível em: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/
onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_750v4.pdf
BOSSEL, H. Indicators for Sustainable Development: Theory, Method, Applications. Winnipeg: IISD, 1999.
BOXEMBAUM, E; JONSSON, S. Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling. In: GREENWOOD, R.
et al. (Eds.). The sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage Publications, p.78-98, 2008.
CLARO, P. B. O; CLARO, D. P; AMÂNCIO, R. Entendendo o conceito de sustentabilidade nas
organizações. Revista de Administração, v.43, n.4, p.289-300, 2008.
CMMAD – Comissão Mundial sobre Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento. Nosso futuro
comum. Tradução de Our common future. 1. ed. 1988. Rio de Janeiro: Editora da Fundação
Getúlio Vargas, 1991.
COLYVAS, J. A; POWELL, W. W. Roads to institutionalization: the remaking of boundaries
between public and private science. Research in Organization Behavior, v.27, p.305-353, 2006.
CONNELLY, B; KETCHEN, D; SLATER, S. F. Toward a theoretical toolbox for sustainability
research in marketing. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science, v.39, p.86-100, 2011.
CZINKOTA, M; KAUFMANN, H. R; BASILE, G. The relationship between legitimacy, reputation, sustainability and branding for companies and their supply chains. Industrial Marketing Management, v.43, p.91–101, 2014.
DAFT, R. L. Teoria e projeto das organizações. 6. ed. Rio de Janeiro: LTC, 1999.
DEEPHOUSE, D. L; CARTER, S. M. An examination of differences between organizational
legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, v. 42, n. 2, p.
-360, 2005.
DENZIN, N; LINCOLN, Y. Introdução a disciplina e a prática da pesquisa qualitativa. In:
DENZIN, N; LINCOLN, Y (Orgs). O planejamento da pesquisa qualitativa. Porto Alegre:
Bookman, 2006.
DIAS, R. Gestão ambiental: responsabilidade social e sustentabilidade. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.
DÍEZ-MARTÍN, F; PRADO-ROMAN, C; BLANCO-GONZÁLEZ, A. "Beyond legitimacy: legitimacy
types and organizational success". Management Decision, v.51, n.10, p.1954-1969, 2013.
DIMAGGIO, P. J; POWELL, W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and
collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, v.48, p.147-160,
DONAIRE, D. Gestão ambiental na empresa. 2. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 1999.
ELKINGTON, J. Partnerships from cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Environmental Quality Management, v.8, n.1, p.37-51, 1998.
FONSECA, V. S. A abordagem institucional nos estudos organizacionais: bases conceituais
e desenvolvimentos contemporâneos. In: VIEIRA, M. M. F; CARVALHO, C. A. (org.). Organiza-
ções, instituições e poder no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2003.
GASKELL, G. Entrevistas individuais e de grupos. In: BAUER, M.W; GASKELL, G. (Orgs.),
Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som. Um manual prático. Petrópolis: Vozes, p.64-
, 2002.
GIDDENS, A. Central problems in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press,
GOLDSTEIN, J. People and products in the fast-growing sustainable scene. In Business, v.1,
HARDI, P; BARG, S. Measuring Sustainable Development: Review of Current Practice. Winnipeg: IISD, 1997.
HART, S. L. Capitalism at the crossroads. 1. ed. Nova Jersey: Wharton School, 2005.
HIRSCH, P. M; ANDREWS, J. A. Y. Administrators response to performance and value challenges: stance, symbols, and behavior. In SERGIOVANNI, T. J; CORBALLY, J. E.(Org). Leadership and Organizational Culture. IL: University of Illinois Press, p.170–185, 1984.
HULT, G. T. Market-focused sustainability: market orientation plus. Journal of the Academy
Marketing Science, v.39, p.1-6, 2011.
JENNINGS, P. D; ZANDBERGEN, P. A. Ecologically sustainable organizations: an institutional
approach. Academy of Management Review, v.20, n.4, p.1015–1052, 1995.
KAZU, R. The path of Kyosei. Harvard Business Review, v.75, n.4, p.55-63, 1997.
KITZBERGER, J; FRAZZON, E. M. Sustentabilidade no transporte: um estudo multicaso em
empresas de transporte rodoviário de cargas. ENANGRAD, 24, Florianópolis, 2013. Anais.
Florianópolis: 2013.
LITMAN, T. Well Measured: Developing Indicators for Sustainable and Livable Transport
Planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Melbourne, Austrália, 2014. Disponível em:
http://www.vtpi.org/wellmeas.pdf
LODGE, G. C. Our common future? Harvard Business Review, v.68, p.221–222, 2001.
MEYER, J. W; ROWAN, B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and
ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, v.83, n.2, p.340-363, 1977.
MEYER, J. W; ROWAN, B. The structure of educational organizations. In: MEYER, J. W;
SCOTT, R. (Eds), Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality. Beverly Hill: Sage
Publications, 1983.
MEYER, J. W; SCOTT, R. Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government,
In: MEYER, J. W.; SCOTT, R. (Eds), Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality, 2 ed.
Beverly Hills: Sage 1992.
MORAIS, D. O. C; OLIVEIRA, N. Q. S; SOUZA, E. M. As práticas de sustentabilidade ambiental
e suas influências na nova formatação institucional das organizações. Revista de Gestão
Ambiental e Sustentabilidade, v.3, n.3, p.90-106, 2014.
OLIVER, C. Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. The Academy of Management
Review, v.16, n.1, p.145-179, 1991.
ORSATO, R. J. Competitive environmental strategies: when does it pay to be green? Califórnia Management Review, v.48, n.2, p.127-143, 2006.
PARENTE, P. H. N; MOTA, A. F; CABRAL, A. C. A; SANTOS, S. M.; BRANDÃO, I. F. Teoria institucional e Disclosure de sustentabilidade
PARENTE, P. H. N; MOTA, A. F; CABRAL, A. C. A; SANTOS, S. M.; BRANDÃO, I. F. Teoria institucional e Disclosure de sustentabilidade: uma investigação no setor de energia elétrica.
Revista de Administração, Contabilidade e Economia, Joaçaba: Unoesc, v.13, n.3, p.889-918,
PARSONS, T. Suggestions for a Sociological Approach to the Theory of Organizations-I.
Administrative Science Quarterly, v.1, n.1, p.63-85, 1956.
PFEFFER, J; SALANCIK, G. R. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence
perspective. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.
PRAJOGO, D; TANG, A. K. Y; LAI, K. H. Do firms get what they want from ISO 14001 adoption? An Australian Perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, v.33, p.117-126, 2012.
QUINQUIN, Z; LUO, Y; MAKSIMOV, V. Achieving legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: The case of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, v.50, n.3,
p.389–403, 2015.
RAMOS, S. A. P; CARDOSO, A. C; CRUZ, M. M. C. Atributos considerados sobre sustentabilidade no transporte rodoviário de carga. Congresso de Pesquisa e Ensino em Transportes,
, Curitiba, 2014. Anais. Curitiba: 2014.
ROSSONI, L. O que é Legitimidade Organizacional. In: Encontro de Estudos Organizacionais
da ANPAD, 7, Curitiba, 2012. Anais. Curitiba, p.1-21, 2012.
RUTHERFORD, I. Use of Models to link Indicators of Sustainable Development. In: MOLDAN, B; BILHARZ, S. (Eds.) Sustainability Indicators: report of the project on indicators of
sustainable development. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1997.
SACHS, I. Estratégias de transição para o século XXI, in: VIEIRA, P. F. (Ed.), Rumo À Ecossocioeconomia: Teoria E Prática Do Desenvolvimento. São Paulo: Cortez Editora, 2007.
SCOTT, W. R. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1995.
SCHALTEGGER, S; HÖRISCH, J. In Search of the Dominant Rationale in Sustainability Management: Legitimacy- or Profit-Seeking? Journal of Business Ethics, p.1-18, 2015.
STAKE, R. Case studies. In: DENZIN, N; LINCOLN, Y. (Eds). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2000.
STRAUSS, A; CORBIN, J. Pesquisa qualitativa: técnicas e procedimentos para o desenvolvimento da teoria fundamentada. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2008.
SUCHMAN, M. C. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, v.20, n.3, p.571-610, 1995.
SZÉKELY, F; KNIRSCH, M. Responsible leadership and corporate social responsibility: metrics for sustainable performance. European Management Journal, v.23, n.6, p.628-647,
TEODÓSIO, A. S. S; BARBIERI, J. C; CSILLAG, J. M. Sustentabilidade e competitividade: novas
fronteiras a partir da gestão ambiental. Revista Gerenciais, v.5, n.1, p.37-49, 2006.
WEBER, M. Economia e sociedade: fundamentos da sociologia compreensiva. 3. ed. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília, 1994
