Analysis of the touristic potential of mountainous areas in Ivano-Frankivsk region to create the development conditions for recreation in the Carpathian region of Ukraine

Ivan Smadych


At present, the development of tourism is a priority for the Carpathian region. However, the unwise construction and lack of a clear strategy for the development of recreational infrastructure has led to environmental problems in some mountain areas. An important component of diversity and the balanced development of the tourism industry is the possibility of fast analysis of the recreational potential availability and the future functions of the recreational facility. In this study, the formation of a common model of tourism potential on the example of several administrative districts was substantiated. The presented research algorithm includes: 1) conditional division of recreational resources for this region into natural-landscape, historical and artistic, socio-economic tourist resources with their internal classification; 2) spatial location of tourist resources; 3) creation of a species intensity scheme of tourist resources, which will become the basis for the creation of the urban development concept in these territories.


Unoccupied tourist resources, Carpathian region of Ukraine, natural-landscape tourist resources, historical and artistic tourist resources, socio-economic tourist resources.

Texto completo:



Dovzhuk, B. (2005). Aktual`ne regional`ne doslidzhennya trudovoyi migraciyi [An urgent regional study of labor migration]. Ukrainian aspect of labor, 3, 37-39

Dringelis, L., Ramanauskas, E., Povilaitienė, I., & Mačiukėnaitė, J. (2015). Exploration and respectation of the spatial structure of cities, towns, townships and villages as a significant formant of their identity. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 39 (1), 79-100.

Gabrel, M. (2004) Prostorova organizaciya mistobudivny`x sy`stem [Spatial Organization of Urban Development Systems] NAS Ukraine, Kiev, VD A.S.S., 350-355

Grichting, A. & Zebich-Knos, M. (Eds.) (2017). The Social Ecology of Border Landscapes. London:Anthem Press.

Ionela, G., Constantin, B. M., & Dogaru, L. (2015). Advantages and Limits for Tourism Development in Rural Area (Case Study Ampoi and Mureş Valleys). Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 1050-1059.

Ky`fyak, V.F. (2003). Organizaciya tury`sty`chnoyi diyal`nosti v Ukrayini [Organization of tourism activity in Ukraine] Chernivtsi: Books, 23-42

Maruya, K., Yamashita, S., & Uchiyama, T. (2015). Community spaces in the minds of traditional craftsmen in a pottery village in Japan. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 4 (4), 253-262.

Milijic, S., Micic, S., & Maksin, M. (2017). Retrospective of and prospects for the development and strategic planning of tourism in the mountain regions of Serbia. Spatium, (37), 42-48.

Order of the State Statistics Committee of Ukraine (2011). Metodologichni polozhennya zi staty`sty`ky` tury`zmu / Derzhavny`j komitet staty`sty`ky` Ukrayiny, 372 [Methodological provisions on tourism statistics / State Statistics Committee of Ukraine, 372]. Kiev, 18.

Panchenko, T.F. (2000). Aktual`ni aspekty` organizaciyi sil`s`kogo tury`zmu (oglyad problem ta deyaki rekomendaciyi).[ Current aspects of the organization of rural tourism (review of problems and some recommendations)] Tourist-lore studies. 3. 58-65

Pitiulych, M. M. (2015). Rehuliuvannia rozvytku hirskykh terytorii v umovakh modernizatsii ekonomiky Ukrainy. Doct. Diss., Lviv: Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine,120, 122.

Pozniak, O.V. (2016). Otsiniuvannia naslidkiv zovnishnoi trudovoi mihratsii v Ukraini. Demography and Social Economy, 2 (27), 174-175.

Richins, H. (2016) Experience Provision in Mountain Tourism: Overview, Contextual Development and Emphasis, in Richins, H. and J. Hull (eds.) Mountain Tourism: Experiences, Communities, Environments and Sustainable Futures, CABI, UK, pp. 13-24.

Rishennya Doly`ns`koyi rajonnoyi rady` shostogo skly`kannya (desyata sesiya). (2011) Pro programu rozvy`tku tury`zmu v Doly`ns`komu rajoni na 2012 - 2015 roky` [About the program of development of tourism in Dolynsky district for 2012-2015, 197-10 / 2011 / decision Dolynsky district council of the sixth convocation (tenth session)], Doly`na, UA, 17.

Schmidt, J.T., Wernen, C., Richins, H. (2016). Mountain Tourism in Germany: Challenges and Opportunities in Addressing Sustainability of Garmisch-Partenkirchen. In Richins, H. and J. Hull (eds.) Mountain Tourism: Experiences, Communities, Environments and Sustainable Futures, CABI, UK, 255-280.

Selective data from the State Statistics Service of Ukraine from Ivano-Frankivsk region, (2018).

Smadych, I. P. (2013). Novi vy`dy` rekreaciyi na osnovi megality`chny`x svyaty`ly`shh Pry`karpattya [New types of recreation on the basis of megalithic sanctuaries of the Precarpathians] Urban Planning and Territorial Planning: Science. Tech. collection, Kiev, KNUBA, 49, 493-501.

Smadych, I.P. (2015). Zastosuvannya metodu poshuku radial`nogo oseredku v konteksti novy`x vy`div rekreaciyi na Pry`karpatti [Application of the radial cell search method in the context of new types of recreation in the Carpathian region] Modern Problems of Architecture and Urban Development: Sci.-Tech. collection, Kiev, KNUBA, 38,283-292.

Steinberg, F. (1996). Conservation and rehabilitation of urban heritage in developing countries. Habitat International, 20 (3), 463-475. (F.,1996)

Suprapti, A., Kim, S., Pandelaki, E. E., & Firmandhani, S. W. (2018). A Spatial Dialogue Of Heritage Village Between Kauman In Semarang And Seochon In Seoul Toward Preservation Development. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 42 (1), 16-23.

Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2015). Transition of Chinese urban–rural planning at the new-type urbanization stage. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 4 (4), 341-343.

Wikipedia: Vicki loves sights. Ivano-Frankivsk region from. (2017).


  • Não há apontamentos.