The squat exercise recruits core muscles as much as localized exercises

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/fm.2024.37103

Abstract

Introduction: In the context of resistance training, which encompasses both strengthening and rehabilitation, the incorporation of global range exercises demands intense activation of the trunk muscle groups, which play a primary role in body stabilization. The squat, notorious for its complexity and effectiveness in activating stabilizers during execution, raises a central question: whether this exercise recruits the muscles more significantly compared to localized exercises, such as push-ups and trunk exten-sions. Objective: To identify the degree of activation of the trunk muscles during squats and compare it with localized exercises for the trunk muscles: lumbar and abdominal. Methods: Using surface electromyography, the activation of the iliocostalis, multifidus, internal oblique, external oblique and rectus abdominis muscles was evaluated. The sample included 16 physically active volunteers of both sexes. A repeated measures t-test (α < 0.05) was used as an analysis method. Results: The iliocostalis, multifidus and internal oblique muscles showed similar levels of activation both in the squat and in their respective isolated exercises, while the rectus abdominis and external oblique muscles showed greater activity during trunk flexion. Conclusion: It is possible to infer that squats are an effective exercise for training the iliocostalis, multifidus and internal oblique muscles, while localized exercises are more suitable for strengthening the external oblique and rectus abdominis muscles. Such conclusion can contribute to optimizing the planning of exercise sessions by replacing isolated trunk exercises with squats.
.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2024-01-17

How to Cite

Sberse, R. T., Zapparoli, L. B., & Brodt, G. A. (2024). The squat exercise recruits core muscles as much as localized exercises . Fisioterapia Em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement), 37. https://doi.org/10.1590/fm.2024.37103

Issue

Section

Original Article