Test-retest reliability of baropodometry in young asyntomatic individuals during semi static and dynamic analysis

Authors

  • Rennie Alves Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
  • Wyngrid Porfirio Borel Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
  • Barbara Palmeira Rossi Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
  • Eduardo José Danza Vicente Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
  • Paula Silva de Carvalho Chagas Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
  • Diogo Carvalho Felício Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5918.031.AO14

Abstract

Introduction: Postural control is a multidimensional construct modulated by the integration of sensory information and muscular activity. One of the challenges in clinical practice and scientific research is the postural data collection of objective control data. Thus, baropodometry can be a promising instrument for analysis. Objective: To evaluate the absolute and relative reliability of baropodometry by means of test-retest in young asymptomatic subjects during semi-static and dynamic analysis. Methods: This is a methodological study, approved by the Research Ethics Committee of UFJF (1,803,411). Sample selection was performed by convenience. Healthy individuals aged 18 to 35 years were included in the study without gender restriction. Participants with pain or any clinical signs of overload which led to unfeasible collection were excluded from the analysis. The variables analyzed were contact surface, maximum and mean pressure, index bow, pressure center and pressure areas in the forefoot, midfoot and hindfoot. Results: 33 individuals (total of 66 feet) participated in this study. The mean body mass of the participants was 63.0 ± 9.9kg, height of 163.4 ± 30.1cm, BMI of 23.7 ± 2.8 kg/m2. It was observed that five out of the eight variables evaluated in the semi-static analysis presented high reliability (≥ 0.70). On the other hand, the reproducibility of the measures in the dynamic analysis was low to moderate (≤ 0.69). Conclusion: Baropodometry findings should be interpreted with caution in clinical practice and in scientific research. It is suggested that complementary assessments be made for decision-making assistance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Original Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)