Comparison of two incremental protocols for evaluation of hip extension

Authors

  • Christian Campos Jara
  • Luis Javier Chirosa Ríos
  • Daniel Jerez Mayorga
  • Ignacio Chirosa Rios
  • Cristian Martínez Salazar
  • Pedro Cesar Beraldo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5918.030.001.AO14

Abstract

Introduction: The hip muscles play an important role in controlling the transverse and frontal plane of the femur during displacement. The hip extension and abduction/adduction exercises are among the most widely evaluated protocols both clinically and in research. Objective: To compare which assessment protocol in an isokinetic strength regime (distal grip-ankle vs. proximal grip-knee) best represents the action of hip extension and to analyze the test-retest reliability in the variables peak force (PF) and work (W). Methods: A total of 20 subjects participated in this research. All participants were female. The mean and standard deviations of age, weight and height were 21 ± 3.9 years, 65 ± 11 kg, 166 ± 3.4 cm, respectively. Results: Significant differences were found in both variables (PF and W) between protocols 1 and 2 (p < 0.05) on assessment days 1 and 2. No differences between days 1 and day 2 in either protocol (p < 0.05) were found. Index values of interclass correlation (ICC) of protocol 1 ranged between 0.38 and 0.86. In protocol 2 the ICC range was between 0.33 and 0.87. Conclusions: In light of these results, the hip extension exercise with a proximal grip best represents the strength of the muscle groups involved in this action.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

How to Cite

Campos Jara, C., Chirosa Ríos, L. J., Jerez Mayorga, D., Chirosa Rios, I., Martínez Salazar, C., & Beraldo, P. C. (2017). Comparison of two incremental protocols for evaluation of hip extension. Fisioterapia Em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement), 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5918.030.001.AO14

Issue

Section

Original Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)